Lorca doesn't keep records like that, plus Discovery is above top secret. Even if Mudd had a record for that, it be above Kirk's clearance level.
The Time Crystals are the most powerful and important technology we’ve seen so far! And nobody GIVES A CRAP about them even when they could WIN THE WAR!!! Just like nobody cared for the drifting ships fitted with the new Cloaking Device technology for SIX MONTHS!
So, why isn't everyone in Starfleet and the Federation in the 24th century using Transporters to de-age themselves after the events in TNG's "Unnatural Selection" - I mean since that occurrence NO ONE is going "Hey look - Transporter Tech is a fountain of youth! You can live FOREVER! All we need is some DNA taken during the age you want to be!"
Yeah, never mentioned or used again or the technique further refined by anyone.
Still seems like there would be something attached to Mudd's file to let anyone dealing with him know that he is someone not to be dealt with lightly.
Maybe, maybe not. #smugHow exactly did you put it? Ah, yes. Eh, maybe, maybe not. Did they ask about them?
Time Index: 29:25:I must have missed the part where they detained Mudd and questioned him. In the episode I saw they let him leave scot-free without asking/caring about this new and powerful technology.
Lastly...it is rare. Mudd might know were to get them, but they might be off some rare animal, or even off the Bajoran orbs. These are things that Starfleet might not be able to justify gathering up, or the numbers they could get won't be enough to outfit every ship for all time. Their might be only 300 of these things possible within a year's time (or even in a hundred years' time). It take time to gather, and by then, whatever it is you needed doing is over.
Yes, I know why the producers chose to use 20th and 21st century music. The reasons are obvious. My original question, however, why is a group of 23rd century young people playing centuries old dance music at a party, was a request for an "in-universe" explanation.No. They’re irrelevant (the differences, not the composers). It matters not one whit whether any or all of them are heard, let alone remembered, in the “23rd century”. The purpose was to indicate to viewers today that the crew was having a party—not a recital or a concert, but a party. The effect is ruined if the viewers are not made to feel like it’s a party in a manner familiar to them. Filmed media is primarily an emotional, not analytical, experience as far as filmmakers are concerned. It’s supposed to FEEL like a party to present day viewers. It’s not supposed to be some sort of neo-anthropological exploration of “the future”.
I didn't mean for my response to be taken as condescending.PS—the condescending attitude isn’t all that helpful, incidentally.
The funny thing is, if you gender swapped this and had Mudd as a pretty girl running away from a really overbearing and abusive husband, we'd all sort of have mixed feelings about this. Sort of like "Wouldn't she be better off going to prison where at least she's facing justice and not delivered into the arms of some psychotic and controlling space pimp?"Let me get this straight...this man just almost killed all the crew..practically condemned all humanity and allies to defeat if succeeded of course...and the punishment he has is to be delivered to the daughter of some rich guy???
what is this Alice in Wonderland??
This guy should have been detained, at least, in some high security prison forever. Not delivered to the arms of a girl.
oh pls....
But, at some point, don't we want Trek to learn from the mistakes of the past and not create such obvious holes?
To be frank I've thought about it and, I dunno, if he is so damn afraid of Stella and her Dad, and he is so damn clever and dangerous to me and my crew, I'd probably make the judgment call of "you take him" as opposed to having him on my ship in any capacity longer than necessary.
Starfleet vessels are packed full of advanced, futuristic technology that the Federation doesn't fully understand. And beyond that, there's ALOT more technology known to Starfleet than technology that Starfleet actually understands and knows how to use correctly.So, why isn't everyone in Starfleet and the Federation in the 24th century using Transporters to de-age themselves after the events in TNG's "Unnatural Selection" - I mean since that occurrence NO ONE is going "Hey look - Transporter Tech is a fountain of youth! You can live FOREVER! All we need is some DNA taken during the age you want to be!"
Yeah, never mentioned or used again or the technique further refined by anyone.
Not least because he still knows way too much about the ships security. Where do you lock him up? He has the keys.
Regardless of whether it's 20, 200, or 2000 years old, music inspires thought and emotion in a person. The passage of time has no power there. I can listen to music written 1300 years ago, for a vastly different audience, and still get pleasure from it, even as the contemporaries of that day found such music to be boorish and mediocre. Hell, look at how we revere Shakespeare, and the man was a smut peddler extraordinaire. Yet he's considered shorthand for high level intellectualism and culture.Yes, I know why the producers chose to use 20th and 21st century music. The reasons are obvious. My original question, however, why is a group of 23rd century young people playing centuries old dance music at a party, was a request for an "in-universe" explanation.
I was watching an episode of Firefly not too long ago and here's what DSC could have done; simply play some of Mozart's (or any of the old master's) classical dance music and have the partiers doing some 18th century baroque style dance. The party could have been just as raucous and the music and dance presented as a fad of the day. Tyler, or someome, asks something like, "never got into this fad".
There truly is nothing new under the sun, especially when it comes to pop culture. So baroque dancing to classical music is one of the things that has cycled around again in the 23rd century, similar to the swing dance craze that surfaced for a short time in the 90's. It could also sinify "the future" without having to resort to creating some weird "future" music.
This would likely have meant eliminating the Al Green song, regrettably, but you don't miss what you don't have.
I didn't mean for my response to be taken as condescending.
at that point he'd have way more knowledge about getting around the security than the crew has of implementing the security.
this is why I'd make a bad captain, I'd have him killed.
The AntiDiscovery Brigade:But, at some point, don't we want Trek to learn from the mistakes of the past and not create such obvious holes?
As I learned from arguing about the Abramsverse movies, this counterargument, meritorious though it is, never works.
The AntiDiscovery Brigade:
"Too different. It is not Trek."
"They should not follow old Trek tropes!"
I don't treat it as a super serious war drama. I treat it as Star Trek's version of a super serious war drama. As a result, there is little conflict in my mind with what I see on the screen.I'm not sure I want it to rise above it. But, treating it as a super-serious war drama and then trying to dismiss the holes doesn't work for me either.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.