Actually, I think the plan has always been that season 1 would just be thirteen episodes regardless if the show is cancelled or renewed for a second season.I wouldn't be surprised if they ordered more episodes for season one.
Actually, I think the plan has always been that season 1 would just be thirteen episodes regardless if the show is cancelled or renewed for a second season.I wouldn't be surprised if they ordered more episodes for season one.
That's tokenism. The real test is to strip out the top three men and the top three women and then see what you have left. If the show isn't sexist, you should have roughly equal numbers of male and female characters in diverse roles. If you have way more men or primarily wives and mothers, you know they screwed the pooch (metaphorically) and there is casual (i.e. they don't even notice that they're doing it) sexism.I'm not sure I'm seeing casual sexism. Grayson and Alara are the two most interesting characters on the show.
That's tokenism.
I'm a fan of the Bechdel-Wallace test. I love The Orville, but it definitely fails that test. So while I don't think it's tokenism, as these characters are integral to the show, there could still be more representation. I'd like to see some non-binary crew, myself.That's tokenism. The real test is to strip out the top three men and the top three women and then see what you have left. If the show isn't sexist, you should have roughly equal numbers of male and female characters in diverse roles. If you have way more men or primarily wives and mothers, you know they screwed the pooch (metaphorically) and there is casual (i.e. they don't even notice that they're doing it) sexism.
Actually, I think the plan has always been that season 1 would just be thirteen episodes regardless if the show is cancelled or renewed for a second season.
Pretty sure it's a foregone conclusion that not all genitals are created equal.So, in other words, there is no "Real test", there is only what somebody who thinks everything is about genital equality.
As has already been stated, you don't sit down to watch a Seth MacFarlane show expecting it to be about gender equality or anything like that. As it is, Orville is doing a much better job with its female characters than Family Guy does with theirs. Kelly and Alara are the show's real action heroes, and while Kelly might to a degree be "the wife" as you put it, there is much more to the character which if it weren't for the repeated references to her and Ed having been married, I'd probably have forgotten it by now. Now compare that to Family Guy, where the female leads are a hot wife who for some inexplicable reason puts up with an ignorant oaf who doesn't appreciate her, and a teenage loser who is the butt of all the show's most cruelest jokes. Hell, you want to bring in MacFarlane's other shows, American Dad is the exact same set up while Cleveland Show shakes things up a bit by having the teenage daughter be a popular girl.That's tokenism. The real test is to strip out the top three men and the top three women and then see what you have left. If the show isn't sexist, you should have roughly equal numbers of male and female characters in diverse roles. If you have way more men or primarily wives and mothers, you know they screwed the pooch (metaphorically) and there is casual (i.e. they don't even notice that they're doing it) sexism.
Pretty sure it's a foregone conclusion that not all genitals are created equal.
How in the world is it tokenism when the two best written/most interesting characters are female?
Uhura was a token on more than one count, as was Sulu, and Chekov, and Scotty. Grayson and Alara? Sorry I'm not seeing it.
I was about to post almost this exact same thing.On a related note, it seems almost all the complaints about this show all seem to be centred around the same thing: It's a Seth MacFarlane being a Seth MacFarlane show. Guess what, we all know what Seth MacFarlane means, he's had three animated sitcoms (one of which premiered eighteen years ago) that have had all kinds of vulgar and inappropriate jokes and are loaded with random and nonsensical pop culture references, with a preference for material from the 1980s. When MacFarlane hosted the Oscars he sang a song about tits and made jokes on stage about rape culture in Hollywood.
All this is well known, so if you're going to sit down and watch a Seth MacFarlane show, expect it to be a Seth MacFarlane show. Don't complain afterwards that it's a Seth MacFarlane show when you knew what you were tuning in for.
I guess there's precedent for Fox. The first season of Sleepy Hollow was only 13 episodes long and that was for a series that premiered at the start of the 2013/2014 ratings period with good ratings.
The pilot of Discovery left me in the cold…space, and it remains in my queue to binge watch after I wrap up Liar and Chance. The Orville however, which has sadly garnered a place on a few negative review lists; IMHO, soars. Overlooking the paean to middle school humor required in comedy today, the Orville is a heartfelt and, dare I say, optimistic view of adventures in space; resisting the current fashion of dark sets and even darker stories. The Orville brightens the final frontier, and enlists and engages us in traveling with its so very human characters (yes, aliens and androids included) in its very warm and inviting universe. Time travel has become a target today for “rotten tomatoes”, but the Orville has managed to create a time machine that allows us 2010 decade moderns of all ages to relive some of the enchantment of the science fiction and fantasy of TOS years ago.
Like the TOS Enterprise crew, the characters on the Orville come across as real people, eschewing technobabble and embracing battlefield humor. As we fly through the local and global dangers of our environment on our shaky spherical vehicle, we need our John Olivers, Jon Stewarts, Jimmys, Baldwins, McKinnons, and Colberts, and their oases of humor to get us out of bed so we can fight the “good fight” (season 2 coming up on CBS All Access, with ST Discovery). There are, alas, many battles ahead for us on Planet Earth, and dystopic science fiction is hardly an inspiration to seize, or even face, the day. Envisioning a future of war, poverty, discrimination, pestilence, starvation, torture, etc. makes us feel...that there is no hope for us to evolve in the next centuries. To do so, we have to identify a vision worth aiming for, to make our progress progressive.
I think it passed the test in "Command Performance", with Alara expressing her lack of confidence to Dr. Finn. But Bechdel is a pretty low threshold.I'm a fan of the Bechdel-Wallace test. I love The Orville, but it definitely fails that test..
I think it has less to do with a test of equality, and more to do with having prominent female characters whose existence precedes essence. Think of how many movies and TV shows from the first 3/4 of the 20th century would only make a character female if she was needed as a love interest, or a victim, or a sex object, etc. The point of the Bechdel test is that this still goes on, but in a more subtle way.I've said it before, and I'll say it again, the Bechdel test is a steaming pile of shit. A female dominated movie like Gravity actually fails the test while a movie that is otherwise sexist garbage can pass the test just by having a ten minute scene in which two female characters talk about shoes. Why this continuously gets held up as the gauge of sexual equality I'll never understand.
Exactly. The test is a good indicator of whether or not a female character is her own fully realized self, or just a part of the furniture.I think it has less to do with a test of equality, and more to do with having prominent female characters whose existence precedes essence. Think of how many movies and TV shows from the first 3/4 of the 20th century would only make a character female if she was needed as a love interest, or a victim, or a sex object, etc. The point of the Bechdel test is that this still goes on, but in a more subtle way.
Think of how many movies and TV shows from the first 3/4 of the 20th century would only make a character female if she was needed as a love interest, or a victim, or a sex object, etc.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.