What evidence do you have that Mudd in particular faced torture and certain death?Face value (that is not projecting a scenario we don't know for sure), it was morally wrong for Lorca to leave Mudd to torture and certain death. There is no justification.
Ah, that someone was part of the plan to torture Lorca and get valuable intellegence from him.Geeze even if he had just left the door open a crack. What kind of creep is Lorca? One minute he's putting his hand up to killing his crew and the next he's running like a coward leaving someone else to suffer.
Do you think he wants to be an asset? Given a choice wouldn't he want his freedom and some fembots instead?Mudd's a Klingon asset. They'll use him again. Torture probably isn't a good way to keep an asset happy.
He tries that a decade later and winds with a planet full of copies of his shrewish wife. He was better off the Klingons. He probably thinks more fondly of Lorca than Kirk.Do you think he wants to be an asset? Given a choice wouldn't he want his freedom and some fembots instead?
Not that I know of. In one of the first episodes, the Klingon speaking over the view screen (which would be post-processed by the nature of the scene) sounded much clearer than he did the rest of the time. I think those kind of scenes are the only exceptions.Oddly enough, my understanding is the Klingons are already overdubbed, and still sound like mushmouths.
Completely forgot a new episode of DSC was out yesterday.
I think that might tell you something.
Nonsense, this is ten years before ship bridge crews routinely survived adventures that killed multiple members of the rest of the crew and were still able to have a good laugh at the end of shift.Tyler should likely be spending a long time with a psychiatrist, after seven months in Klingon captivity. Never allowed anywhere near sensitive items on Discovery or any other ship.
Star Trek D - The Search For Hairthey all end up with hair
fixed that for youBecause Reasons.
Welcome toDiscoveryStar Trek
You guys are horrible.
You know what you are argiung in favour for are war crimes?
And not even the little known ones, like "putting bombs on dead enemy soldiers to prey upon them when they are retrieving their dead". No. The real serious ones. Like leaving behind people for Torture and death for no apparent reason other than "they don't look trustworthy". Seriously. I can't believe I have to argue in favour of basic human rights. On a Star Trek forum no less.
That is so very well said.This. Calling people horrible, or questioning their morals and making statements insinuating that fans of discovery are akin to trump supporters (as I've seen posters do in other threads), because they like a different tv show than you is pretty uncalled for. Insulting people is not a good way to get people to understand your point of view. Just take it down a notch.
We aren't talking about real people, they are fictional characters. People like fictional characters be they heroes or villain or somewhere in between for any number of reasons. Someone liking Lorca doesn't make them any more morally bankrupt than someone liking Picard makes them morally superior.
FFS, stop being so personally affronted that people are enjoying a tv show that you aren't.
Agreed. Constructive criticism is one thing. I was quite critical of the first two episodes myself and still think they were bad for selling this series to an audience. But some of the comments I've read here show people taking this stuff WAY too serious.That is so very well said.
It is really difficult to understand the sentiment that some seem to have: "I hate something, therefore you must hate it as well."
I really did not like the first season of TNG. Guess what? I don't watch it. There is a subforum on this site for TNG discussion -- I don't go there since I mostly didn't like that show. What positive purpose would there be for me to just go into an area where obviously most of the people like it and try to demand that they hate it? That would just be silly and childish.
You may be happy being forced to teach your children Klingoneese, but I am NOT.Agreed. Constructive criticism is one thing. I was quite critical of the first two episodes myself and still think they were bad for selling this series to an audience. But some of the comments I've read here show people taking this stuff WAY too serious.
I definitely want to see an explanation for that as well because that's far more disturbing than what he did to Mudd. I have a feeling we won't figure it out until the end of the season.why he escaped the loss of his previous ship. I understand what he did. But why did he choose to escape and not share the same fate has his crew?
Great. Now i've got the image of Stamets hanging from by his underwear on a chest-high coat hook with the computer voice saying "NERD!!!!"Well, it COULD have been worse - they could have decided to show the device giving the integrated navigator a Wedgie...![]()
Mudd was the only one in that cell who showed no signs of ever having been tortured. For all Lorca can tell, he's actively colluding with Klingon intelligence. Bring him along just because he happens to be a human? Fuck that. Mudd's working for/with the Klingons, which means he can stay right the hell where he is.Leaving him with the Klingons to be tortured and possibly killed, or taking him along, putting him in the Discovery's brig and then in Federation prison. It's pretty easy to see which one of these are morally superior, and with very little added risk.
That is so very well said.
It is really difficult to understand the sentiment that some seem to have: "I hate something, therefore you must hate it as well."
I really did not like the first season of TNG. Guess what? I don't watch it. There is a subforum on this site for TNG discussion -- I don't go there since I mostly didn't like that show. What positive purpose would there be for me to just go into an area where obviously most of the people like it and try to demand that they hate it? That would just be silly and childish.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.