Okay, I'm now four episodes into Discovery I don't understand the situation with the Klingons. At all. As in, I don't get their motivations for the war and who is leading them now 6 months later.
Here's my understanding of the situation:
-- In "Vulcan Hello", T'Kumva finds and turns on the ancient beacon of Kahless. This summons the various Klingon houses to him. There he persuades them to war on the Federation because "the Federation lies" and they've forgotten what it means to be Klingons. Apparently this works and the war starts.
-- In the "Butcher's Knife" we find out that the war has been going on for six months. The Federation is developing new weapons, etc. The Klingons are attacking but Voq, the new disciple of T'Kumva has been sitting on his keester in a broken vessel that happens to be the only ship in the Klingon fleet with a cloaking device. It's taken them 6 months to affect repairs in which time he and his crew have been seemingly forgotten. They're starving and no one has come to their aid-- even though their ship has technology that no other Klingon vessel possesses.
I don't get it. The excuse to start the war was flimsy at best. Seriously. There's literally no motivation for it to be happening other than "canon says so." However, the fact that Voq's ship has been sitting there for half a year makes even less sense to me. It has a cloak-- which means that it should have been a priority to salvage and recover that tech. However, in half a year neither the Federation nor the Klingons have gone back to check on it? At all?
Furthermore-- if "T'Kumva's annointed successor" has been absent, who is leading this war? There has to be a central figure otherwise a United Federation of Planets could have just rolled over the individual warring houses like a steam roller.
Seriously-- what am I missing? Is this just bad writing?
Here's my understanding of the situation:
-- In "Vulcan Hello", T'Kumva finds and turns on the ancient beacon of Kahless. This summons the various Klingon houses to him. There he persuades them to war on the Federation because "the Federation lies" and they've forgotten what it means to be Klingons. Apparently this works and the war starts.
-- In the "Butcher's Knife" we find out that the war has been going on for six months. The Federation is developing new weapons, etc. The Klingons are attacking but Voq, the new disciple of T'Kumva has been sitting on his keester in a broken vessel that happens to be the only ship in the Klingon fleet with a cloaking device. It's taken them 6 months to affect repairs in which time he and his crew have been seemingly forgotten. They're starving and no one has come to their aid-- even though their ship has technology that no other Klingon vessel possesses.
I don't get it. The excuse to start the war was flimsy at best. Seriously. There's literally no motivation for it to be happening other than "canon says so." However, the fact that Voq's ship has been sitting there for half a year makes even less sense to me. It has a cloak-- which means that it should have been a priority to salvage and recover that tech. However, in half a year neither the Federation nor the Klingons have gone back to check on it? At all?
Furthermore-- if "T'Kumva's annointed successor" has been absent, who is leading this war? There has to be a central figure otherwise a United Federation of Planets could have just rolled over the individual warring houses like a steam roller.
Seriously-- what am I missing? Is this just bad writing?