97% is pretty much as close to unanimous as you can get.Climate change conclusions are not unanimous...
97% is pretty much as close to unanimous as you can get.Climate change conclusions are not unanimous...
97% is pretty much as close to unanimous as you can get.
Wow, you have a staggeringly poor understanding of Cat Grant as a character if you could believe that. She's always been relentlessly dedicated to speaking the truth, no matter how much it hurts. When Supergirl went bad thanks to red kryptonite, Cat had the courage to speak up and warn the public even though it hurt her reputation to denounce her own pet superhero.
My wife has a degree in Environmental Science, with a Minor in Emergency Management. What kind of qualifications you have to ignore 97% of climate scientists?Again, among a biased and politically motivated group. We have already seen and been told of instances where the data has been manipulated to affect the outcome.
Anyone remember that Norwegian super-volcano that blew in 2010? Eyjafjallajokull. It emitted significant greenhouse gases and particulate matter into the atmosphere and what happened? Airplanes were grounded for about a week and a few thousand people coughed until the air cleared 6 days later.
Just saying that is is awfully hubris of us to think that we have that significant an impact over a short period of time; especially when polar ice cores indicate that the planet goes through phases like this where it has become much hotter, and much cooler.
These same 97% state that we are overdue for another mini ice age- ice ages have historically ALWAYS been precluded by a period of global temperature rise.
My wife has a degree in Environmental Science, with a Minor in Emergency Management. What kind of qualifications you have to ignore 97% of climate scientists?
I know Cat is unflinchingly honest, so my comment was more about Marsdin's methodology and things that I think the DEO might be involved in than it was about her.
But that's just it. Cat wouldn't work for a dishonest president, or one willing to employ fascist and unethical surveillance tactics against the American people. Marsdin may be hiding her alien nature, but otherwise she's on the up-and-up, which is why Cat trusts and respects her enough to work for her.
But that's just it. Cat wouldn't work for a dishonest president, or one willing to employ fascist and unethical surveillance tactics against the American people. Marsdin may be hiding her alien nature, but otherwise she's on the up-and-up, which is why Cat trusts and respects her enough to work for her.
Cat knows about the existence of the DEO, though, and the clandestine and beyond-the-law nature of what they do.
But she accepts it as a positive and necessary thing. Illegal surveillance of the sort you're talking about is a whole other matter.
No, I just class anyone that seriously claims a disbelief in a near unanimously held scientific conclusion to be a moron. Doesn't matter if it's climate change, the Earth being a sphere or sticking a fork in a live plug socket being very unhealthy life choice. The bigotry just seems to come along for the ride, all by itself more often than not. I can't help that there's an increasing correlation between the two.
1) I said "near unanimous". Learn to recognise qualifiers.It is not a "unanimously held scientific conclusion" concerning climate change. It's not even 97% that you claimed later. That's 97% of the 100% who first came up with the conclusion.
It is not a "unanimously held scientific conclusion" concerning climate change. It's not even 97% that you claimed later. That's 97% of the 100% who first came up with the conclusion.
I do wonder if global warming would be seen as a big deal in this universe. We know that you have alien planets that you could in theory relocate human life to.
Plus when you got a Superman and Supergirl I got to think for many they figure that one of the superheros will somehow save the planet no matter what crisis tends to happen.
Doesn't do all the animals much good. Besides, it would be immensely harder to relocate 7 billion people than it would be to embrace green energy.
If anything, I'd think alien technology would make it easier to develop alternative energy sources and environmental recovery methods, since other, more advanced planets would already have such stuff. But you need to get people to accept the reality of the problem before you can fix it.
Superheroes can only do so much to save the world if humans insist on systematically endangering it. It's better in the long run to fix our own problems instead of using superheroes as an excuse to be irresponsible.
TV Guide said:Triggers
Psi, a thief with psychic powers, attacks National City and is able to immobilize people by tapping into their worst fears. Meanwhile, James and Lena are at an impasse; and Samantha starts her new job at L-Corp.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.