I'm in the easy with it camp, thank you very much. How the sarcmark never took off I've no idea, its not like there's no necessity.
I think we just need to accept the fact that this is a full reboot.
- Thread starter The Rock
- Start date
I'm in the easy with it camp, thank you very much. How the sarcmark never took off I've no idea, its not like there's no necessity.
"Repeat to yourself, it's just a show..."
I wish a Torgo's Pizza with complimentary crazy bread would solve the problems in the fanbase.
I stopped watching after episode 2. Have they explained why the Klingon's biology is different yet? Or why the technology is so advanced? Otherwise, I will continue to abstain from watching more episodes.
1: Because they changed make up, as they have done about half a dozen time
2: Its 2017, its not gonna look like the 1960's
Then it's not a Prime Universe show. Because this isn't what it looks like. I want to be able to watch, but it makes no sense.
By your logic, the Prime Timeline ended with the third season of TOS, which is just dumb.
You can keep repeating your bunk "alternative facts" arguments all you want, but it won't change a thing.
Likewise.
^ I'm not spouting "alternative facts"; I'm spouting ACTUAL facts.
You clearly can't tell the difference, which is just sad.
You clearly can't tell the difference, which is just sad.
Looks are not canon, this in fact is what Prime looks like now.
Besides, David Mack said things will gradually evolve to look more like a modern version of TOS. The Constitution-class starships are said or heavily implied to be a unique subspecies unto themselves in terms of design and aesthetics. Since "The Cage" was the only glimpse of the Prime timeline in the 2250s we got before DSC we have almost nothing else to go on. The Enterprise was just one starship in a huge fleet, carrying only 203 men and women.
That's all it take for someone to drop a show now?
Seriously? Ok, let's spin this another way - you're the show runner of a new Star Trek TV series. You have to shoot in 4K for widescreen TVs. People have communicators in their pockets now. You have to impress them with your visuals.
So the first thing you do is colored buttons with no purpose just to appease people that can't get past 60s sets?
To be fair, I only Gave The Orville three. Sometimes you just do not like something
True, but this isn't an Orville BBS. I'm sure you wouldn't jump over to one and piss and moan about it ad infinitum. That's what I don't get about people here. We get it, you don't like it. There are other subforms to visit.
And I see yet another argument about the "future" sets has started. *facepalm*
Also a fair point. I would not go to their forum and whine about all the things I dislike, things I knew about for a year.
Why should they? As far as they ( and we) are concerned there is no change. The Klingons and the technology of the 23rd Century have always looked like that.
Did you also refrain from watching Star Trek between 1979 and 2005?
SW is a fantasy world, it doesn't have to worry about today's technology being miles ahead of the 1960's imagined 23rd century.
