So far as I know, he has a relationship with the ship's Doctor, Hugh Culbert. We haven't met Dr. Culbert yet in the series, but apparently he and Stamets are partners.My impression of Stamets was that he is serious, a little snarky and possibly has a chip on his shoulder. He's a dedicated follower of mushrooms. He doesn't exude sex appeal (though being female I might not be seeing it, even though I can still see appeal in another woman), so he might have trouble getting himself a love or sex interest. Still he might catch Saru's beady little eye, but he has no great liking for his Captain. I wonder what the rules are for dalliances on the Star ship are anyway? I remember with Voyager thinking that given the limited pool of partners (stranded in the Delta Quadrant) that they would be at it like rabbits, but I think only Tom and B'Ellana actually procreated. I guess the others were inter-relating too but it wasn't necessary for the story lines.
I wonder what the rules are for dalliances on the Star ship are anyway?
Oh thank you. I missed that.So far as I know, he has a relationship with the ship's Doctor, Hugh Culbert. We haven't met Dr. Culbert yet in the series, but apparently he and Stamets are partners.
My impression of Stamets was that he is serious, a little snarky and possibly has a chip on his shoulder. He's a dedicated follower of mushrooms. He doesn't exude sex appeal (though being female I might not be seeing it, even though I can still see appeal in another woman), so he might have trouble getting himself a love or sex interest. Still he might catch Saru's beady little eye, but he has no great liking for his Captain. I wonder what the rules are for dalliances on the Star ship are anyway? I remember with Voyager thinking that given the limited pool of partners (stranded in the Delta Quadrant) that they would be at it like rabbits, but I think only Tom and B'Ellana actually procreated. I guess the others were inter-relating too but it wasn't necessary for the story lines.
Were they really? Did they seem.. rate worthy?You missed the 18 rated episodes then?
Were they really? Did they seem.. rate worthy?
That can happen when you're exploring strange new worlds..They went where no man has gone before...
That can happen when you're exploring strange new worlds..
Seeking out new life and new civilizations...That can happen when you're exploring strange new worlds..
Work on my model train layout.I mean seriously, you are in a self contained mini world which maintains all your needs, with very little hope of getting home even if you try on a ship which left to it's own devices floating in space can pretty much sustain every aspect of it's internal environment, feed you and deal automatically with all your waste products and medical needs.
You are surrounded by hundreds of attractive people all equally stuck for a purpose to existence.
What exactly would you do to fill your time?
Work on my model train layout.
I forgot the other part of what I said, when I'm not with Gaila or the unnamed Orion girl in the 2009 movie!I'll, er, leave you to it then.
Anyone not busy?
I forgot the other part of what I said, when I'm not with Gaila or the unnamed Orion girl in the 2009 movie!
I basically said the same thing way back when the news was first announced.If Trek wanted gayness to be a big deal, they should have done it during the 90's.
Or even the noughties. IIRC, the original plan was for Malcolm Reed to be gay, but the producers wimped out.
Now it's 2017 and Star Trek has an ongoing gay character in a world where pretty much every show has LGBT representation. Wow. Amazing. Bravo.
Yup. It would have been way more ambitious to have a trans character.Yup, they're just now getting around to a gay character when everyone else is on to casting trans and nonbinary ones. In about the 2030's Trek might be where the rest of TV is now. Maybe.
A thousand times this. Never understood why so many sci-fi fans abhor romance in their fiction. Of course (!) that romance should be done well on the show, no question about that. But just completely erasing it makes no sense whatsoever, because it's intrinsically linked to people and their experiences; and in the end that's what fiction should be about.I'd hope we have left that stereotype behind, myself. Science Fiction isn't just about spaceships and anomalies and lasers. It's about people in a fantastical world. And romance is a big part of people's lives.
Yeah, no. The shows are written for today's audience, not that of the 23rd/24th century. In this day and age representation of homosexuality in media has still an important role to play. Just assuming “it has always been there” but unseen in the background just isn't enough. Let's talk about it again when it's actually the 23rd century.I could be wrong, but I would presume that in the Trekverse 23rd/24th century there are plenty of same sex relationships, but the self-identification as being "gay" is probably a quaint historical footnote. This would help explain why we didn't actually see gay characters in the past - it's just that the same-sex relationships of some of the characters were never written about, not that all of them were categorically "straight."
He's a dedicated follower of mushrooms.'
Almost!Wasn't that a Kinks song?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.