I'm not gonna lie, I think that's a beautiful bridge/set. It blows the Apple Store bridge out of the water.
Very well put. The love they poured into this is very apparent.It is so obvious that the people involved put so much love into things like this... To me, DSC truly feels like a labor of love. No matter how much hatred certain people try to spread around (in here, and elsewhere around the net), you can never take that away. Love always wins. That's why I believe DSC will succeed.
Very well put. The love they poured into this is very apparent.
On a side note, I really dig these short topical featurettes they are putting out now almost daily. What will be the next one? The Discovery herself possibly? Or might they still save that up for a proper reveal in the premiere?
Here are some screenshots no-one asked for …
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Actually, I was thinking how I can totally believe everyday office chairs are a natural precursor to what Kirk's bridge had.I can see it now.. "those chairs are completely generic."
...does that mean the bridge will have a window à la Star Trek (2009) and the Shenzhou?
Cue the naysayers
Well, I didn't ask for it, but I certainly am appreciative of it anywayVery well put. The love they poured into this is very apparent.
On a side note, I really dig these short topical featurettes they are putting out now almost daily. What will be the next one? The Discovery herself possibly? Or might they still save that up for a proper reveal in the premiere?
Here are some screenshots no-one asked for …
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
From what I have seen from more recent promos, this is much closer to the lighting the series will have.Less blue and lighter, if anyone is curious:
![]()
i hope so! the gold-ish cast to the bulkheads is really attractive and unique for a starfleet ship.From what I have seen from more recent promos, this is much closer to the lighting the series will have.
That bridge set looks decades more advanced then the TNG bridge or even the later Enterprise-E bridge. I wonder if there will be an episode of STD (maybe the series finale) when a bunch of Luddites take over Starfleet and revert all the tech to where it should be to explain why STD is the most advanced looking ST series ever. At least the reboot movies could use BS "butterfly effect" logic for why everything made the TNG era look like the bronze age in comparison. Also, I like how the Captain's chair just has two tablet computers stuck in the arm rests![]()
I said it in another thread, but it's worth saying here...
To me, the 1960's look of TOS is the look of the 1960's TOS TV show, it is NOT necessarily the look of the TOS universe.
Well, I suppose I don't get as hung up on such things, and let my imagination just run within the fictional universe.
It's "sorta, kinda" like an Asimov Book I once read ("Nightfall", I believe). Asimov included a preface in that book explaining that the characters in the book have been anthropomorphized for ease of story-telling, and the characters were written as if they were human, but that the characters in the story were actually aliens who were very very un-humanlike.
The human-like descriptions were not accurate, but that was not important. I could let my imagination just run within the fictional universe Asimov was presenting and think the characters looked like whatever I wanted. I certainly knew they didn't look and act human, even though that's the way they were written.
Similarly (or at least in the same vein) I think the TOS enterprise bridge may have been shown to have gum-drop lights, toggle switches, analog chronometers and such, but they look that way for "ease of storytelling" (i.e., because that's the way they felt like showing them in 1966), I could let my imagination just run within the fictional universe and think the TOS enterprise can look like anything I want.
Sigh...this argument again. I don't know how to address this because I can't really get my head around how to explain homage within a fictional TV series vs. watching actual history. ST is not actual history. It's made-up. Stuff happens that's not meant to be taken 100% literally. Apparently you're totally comfortable with the idea that for about 20 years in the mid-to-late 23rd century, technology and aesthetics are suddenly going to take a giant leap backward and look like a tacky 60's set with tech that isn't capable of stuff it's already capable of in real life, as long as "canon" is preserved. Forget about willing suspension of disbelief, everything must preserve the illusion that Star Trek is real.
I can't be that kind of viewer. I really don't understand the mindset that "canon" (which really has nothing to do with visuals anyway; never has) overrides everything. Canon is not a tiny box in which to trap creativity. It's just a guide for the events of this universe for the writers to use.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.