(Yes, I know it's 200 years after the war, but I highly doubt that a major city could be rebuilt from scratch in that short a time)
With anti-gravity and replicators, it should be child's play.
(Yes, I know it's 200 years after the war, but I highly doubt that a major city could be rebuilt from scratch in that short a time)
With anti-gravity and replicators, it should be child's play.
Neither of which existed in the days after the war. Only centuries afterward.
Besides, you're presupposing a world which has most of its technology and infrastructure intact. After a global thermonuclear war, how likely do you think that would be?
About as likely as a drunk genius living in Montana considering the choice to travel by either train or aircraft to be simple preference options.
The historical meaning was the opposite: destroy 10% of it, so that 90% remains.Decimate means to reduce something to 10% of what it was. As in decimating an army is to kill only 90% of them specifically.
If it reflects current political standings it will show a Trump like character ruling.
Good stuff![]()
Will he be orange?
In a functioning society we have every right to call the ideas of someone who are not based on any logical analysis of facts garbage. Heck we have every right to be illogical and claim everyone else is insane and deny all the facts and science we want. Disagreeing is not intolerant, neither is not being convinced by lousy arguments. I think your stance is garbage and hope that you would change your mind some day. This does not mean that I will discriminate against you in any way outside of personal preference. Claiming that you are being treated unfairly, i.e. using the term intolerant for people who disagree with you is really kind of pathetic. It comes across as extremely small.Tolerant as always. And the left wonders why it keeps losing elections...
I was trying to be sarcastic....I failed.And? WWIII isn't real. It "decimated" whatever the writers wanted it to decimate.
The world presented in Star Trek is very narrow. All the internal justifications for that don't make it immune to criticism.
That will the big mid-season reveal: all the Klingons are bald except the leader who has a very special coif of hair.He'll be bald, lol.
I'm out. Have fun.
He made a fair point in my opinion..In a functioning society we have every right to call the ideas of someone who are not based on any logical analysis of facts garbage. Heck we have every right to be illogical and claim everyone else is insane and deny all the facts and science we want. Disagreeing is not intolerant, neither is not being convinced by lousy arguments. I think your stance is garbage and hope that you would change your mind some day. This does not mean that I will discriminate against you in any way outside of personal preference. Claiming that you are being treated unfairly, i.e. using the term intolerant for people who disagree with you is really kind of pathetic. It comes across as extremely small.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.