Totally.Faster than light travel is still entirely hypothetical and may not be any kind of practical reality.
Claiming you can design a realistic ship that can do that is a serious level of bullshit.
Totally.Faster than light travel is still entirely hypothetical and may not be any kind of practical reality.
Claiming you can design a realistic ship that can do that is a serious level of bullshit.
There is no genuine reason you can think of for the advancement of tech? None?
That absolutely should be explained.
That absolutely should be explained.
I'm asking if anyone can come up with one.But that's the thing, it's not an advancement, it's a de-evolution. DSC is 10 years before TOS, yet the tech in DSC looks like it's 70 years more advanced than TOS. That absolutely should be explained.
You can bet if they ever show a Constitution class it will be a redesign.
But that's the thing, it's not an advancement, it's a de-evolution. DSC is 10 years before TOS, yet the tech in DSC looks like it's 70 years more advanced than TOS. That absolutely should be explained.
No, it shouldn't.
We're seeing the 2250s through the eyes of the 21st century now, not the 1960s.
You can bet if they ever show a Constitution class it will be a redesign.
Its not 1966 anymore. There.
It can't be explainedI'm looking for an in-universe explanation.
I'm looking for an in-universe explanation.
Thanks for that real-world explanation. I already knew that. I'm looking for an in-universe explanation.
I cannot think of one thing from the Discovery production information that I have gone "Oh, hey D&D" or "No idea what that's for?" so I'm clearly dense. No, I think everything works very well in this setting, and will become more clear when the show is released.You guys are either superbly dense or being purposefully obtuse.
Because you just don't seem to get the difference between updating a design and tossing a design out and replacing it with something else.
The Phasers, Communicator, and Tricorder are all good examples of updating designs. You can look at each and instantly know "that's a federation phaser", "that's a federation communicator". and "that's a federation tricorder". Which is pretty much the limitus test for whether a visual update was done right or not.
If however you look at something that is taking place in an existing setting and go "what the fuck is that supposed to be" well then you know theirs a problem with the design. And if you look at something from that setting and instead think, "hey isn't that necromonger armor from Chronicles of Riddik" or "Oh hey, that's Drow Armor from D&D" you don't just have a problem, you have a giant mess on your hands and need to fix things fast.
You guys are either superbly dense or being purposefully obtuse.
Because you just don't seem to get the difference between updating a design and tossing a design out and replacing it with something else.
The Phasers, Communicator, and Tricorder are all good examples of updating designs. You can look at each and instantly know "that's a federation phaser", "that's a federation communicator". and "that's a federation tricorder". Which is pretty much the limitus test for whether a visual update was done right or not.
If however you look at something that is taking place in an existing setting and go "what the fuck is that supposed to be" well then you know theirs a problem with the design. And if you look at something from that setting and instead think, "hey isn't that necromonger armor from Chronicles of Riddik" or "Oh hey, that's Drow Armor from D&D" you don't just have a problem, you have a giant mess on your hands and need to fix things fast.
So you missed the pictures of Klingon armor?I cannot think of one thing from the Discovery production information that I have gone "Oh, hey D&D" or "No idea what that's for?" so I'm clearly dense. No, I think everything works very well in this setting, and will become more clear when the show is released.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.