Drift happens.
WB's Justice League 2017 movie pre-discussion thread
- Thread starter Samurai8472
- Start date
No.
There's no way it's coming out this fall, they have to reshoot everything Snyder did, including retroactively reshooting BvS...
Post Flashpoint, the general sequence of events is the same, only they happened on a compressed timeline.
And now the timeline is decompressing, so it should be interesting to see how much of it gets fully recanonised...
You're on the wrong earth pal.
We're getting a "Justice League of America" movie this fall
I have kind of mixed feelings on this one, on one hand I hate what TKJ did to Babs, so I would have no problem just ignoring it in the DCEU, but at the same time Oracle was nice representation for people with disabilities and a lot more interesting than just another Bat hero, so I'd hate to lose that. Although if Oracle is going just be a part of her backstory, and not actually part of any of the stories, then I don't think there'd be a lot of harm in not using it.
Ooh, here's an idea: Since Batman is older in this continuity, with a fair amount of history, what they could do is to establish that Jim Gordon's wife Barbara Keane was the original Batgirl, and was then paralyzed and became Oracle, the role she now holds in the present, and now her namesake daughter is following in her footsteps as the new Batgirl. Not sure the timing quite works out, but it's a possibility.
I'm so on board with turning the movie into a Justice Lady movie.
Movies with multiple superheroes generally bore me to death because there's just not enough room for characterization or character development. It's obviously even worse when it's Superjerk and BatTank in an unpleasant movie full of unpleasant images but I thoroughly disliked Avengers, too. Just endless over the top action scenes.
Movies with multiple superheroes generally bore me to death because there's just not enough room for characterization or character development. It's obviously even worse when it's Superjerk and BatTank in an unpleasant movie full of unpleasant images but I thoroughly disliked Avengers, too. Just endless over the top action scenes.
LOL--I think this is filler conversation until something new comes out. I just finished watching the extended cut of BVS and it really is a much better movie with a lot of the originally omitted details making the story much more fleshed out. Of course, some of the elements are just not fixable like the Luthor and Perry White characters--but taking the story for what it is I really do like this movie.
I saw the extended cut and thought the added content just made the movie even more bloated because it didn't add anything of relevance. It turned an incoherent and unpleasant mess of a movie into an even longer incoherent and unpleasant mess.
Meanwhile, the Scarlet Avenger remains on Marvel's desk of "maybes".^^
Actually, that has been scrapped as well.
Instead we're getting Justice Lady
Official Poster:
OBJECTIFIED!
I see what you were going for there, but in-universe, the Scarlet Avenger would presumably be the Scarlet Witch.
Well technically, BvS was a one hero movie, Batman was a baddie for two thirds of it
Well technically, BvS was a one hero movie, Batman was a baddie for two thirds of it
I thought Superman was the baddie for two thirds of it.
In either case, IMO comic book movies with multiple villains are even worse then films with multiple heroes.
Well technically, BvS was a one hero movie, Batman was a baddie for two thirds of it
Yeah, and the one hero was Wonder Woman, because Superman was more a plot point in the movie than an actual protagonist.
Why would you say that when "Spider-Man 3" turned out so well?