if we ever wanted to have a socity as idealistic as federation humans, i'd imagine the replicator is the only thing to remove greed and the rat race to that extant?
i mean more if we could import one of these technologies into the real world. as sexy as warp is, humanity would be much better benefited by cheap functional replicators.There wouldn't be a Federation, utopia or not, without the warp drive.
So I say the warp drive is the "piece of tech.".
Federation notwithstanding, some sort of replication device for unlimited food and supplies would be far more important to attain a utopian society (whether it's the Federation proper or some other Utopia) than star travel. Actually, quite the opposite. How many sci-fi movies do you see that meeting alien species results in less than pleasant results? I'm not saying that's what would happen, but it could as easily as not in exploring the stars.
The Federation, I would argue, became more utopian (still not there, though) after replicators.
Between the two, I would rather Humanity had a FTL drive.as sexy as warp is, humanity would be much better benefited by cheap functional replicators.
Soylent Green.One thing that I'm uncertain of, though, is where the replicator gets its raw materials.
By itself, neither will the replicator.but that won't create a world of compassion and tolerance.
That might actual work against regional and world peace. Today with interconnected trade, nations need each other and depend on each other for food, goods and resources.True, though replicators could reduce some of the competition for resources between peoples.
We had a thread a year ago or so where it was determined the replicator is definitely an energy to matter and matter to energy converter, but there are also trade agreements for raw materials and various statements and displays of raw materials being harvested. My guess is replicators are expensive to run, power wise, and that running off raw materials makes them cheaper, but on a Starship with limited volume and extremely high power output it makes sense to use direct energy to matter conversion and not bother with the more efficient chemical level replication. That would also explain why a small Maquis colony has a single public replicator in their town square, rather than everyone having their own replicator.One thing that I'm uncertain of, though, is where the replicator gets its raw materials. I believe it was the FASA (non-canon) TNG Officer's Manual that mentioned that the replicators pulled from the ships' supplies, whereas I've read other sources that said that the replicator pulls elements from the surroundings.
If the former, then no, the replicator would have no bearing on greed as you'd need to afford the supplies to run it.
That said, I'm sure that the replicator would be one of, if not THE most important factor in removing greed if the raw material source is not a factor.
I recall a thread like that, but I don't remember such a definitive conclusion being reached!...We had a thread a year ago or so where it was determined the replicator is definitely an energy to matter and matter to energy converter
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.