The idea being that it's not a Berman trek. There's no reason it would have to be that way. I'm sure it would have been very different thanks to an entirely new creative team. Yeah, not many want more of the same old stuff. A fresh new take on it? You bet!
Kelvin Timeline all but confirmed
- Thread starter captainkirk
- Start date
The idea being that it's not a Berman trek. There's no reason it would have to be that way. I'm sure it would have been very different thanks to an entirely new creative team. Yeah, not many want more of the same old stuff. A fresh new take on it? You bet!
I predict someday we are going get a hardcore remake of Trek. Something like Kirk will be a women and Picard is her first officer and Data is a Vulcan looking android created by his dad Spock. McCoy will be a hot new 20 something doctor getting his first posting. The main villians will be a alliance between the Borg and the Ferengi who in this version are brutal warriors who steal gold press latinum to eat it.If small universe syndrome is bad with shows set within decade(s), imagine how would it feel if Sarek showed up in a show set 100 years after Nemesis.
Jason
I would like a time frame of 20 or 40 years so you could have more of the old characters appear.
I just don't understand how fans will say they want a series to be a little past Nemesis and that timeframe so it will be further into the future, but then say they'd like TNG characters to appear. If you want series and movies to keep going further out into the 25th Century, why do you want TNG people to be in it?
I sometimes wonder what they put in the water where you live...
You know what would have been a good timeframe is post "TOS" but before "TNG." The tech you see in the trailer actually looks more primitive then stuff you see on TNG. It looks better designed for the most part because they are using modern technology to make the show but not super futuristic to me.
I would actually buy that stuff happening in that timeframe except the Klingons and they might be explained away by being ancient Klingons.
Jason
I would actually buy that stuff happening in that timeframe except the Klingons and they might be explained away by being ancient Klingons.
Jason
Wow, that's a nice cheerful world you live in! Maybe try to relax and enjoy it a bit?
Because some fans dislike JJ Trek
They should set it in 2250, ten years before reboot Kirk and Spock's 5-year-mission, just to screw with everyone's heads even further
Come on guys, we can reach a compromise. If some don't like the Kelvin universe, and some don't like the Prime universe, let's simply set it in the Babylon 5 universe.
*angry mob of Niners show up with torches and pitchforks*
I hope you aren't a writer on the show.
I didn't notice any grey hair and the Enterprise was around a long time before Kirk took command.
How old is the Enterprise supposed to be in TOS? Could it be the same age as Kirk?
However, you could be right, but not because of the mention Enterprise, but because the traile says ten years before Kirk, Spock and the Enterprise. The most sensible conclusion is that imeans before we meet all three together on the Five year mission.
About twenty years old. It was commissioned in 2245.
And Marrow says it's "20 years old" in TSFS, which just goes to show how much this stuff really matters. (Or doesn't.)
Why is this so hard for folks to grasp?
Similar threads
