Well the novels do have a big Borg invasion.Culminating with a bad ass Borg Invasion that unifies former Alpha Quadrant enemies and brings all the previous 24th century Trek actors into the fold for an epic TV wrap up / tribute to Trek before switching up the style and status quo *completely* for a PROPER prequel show, that may or may not have been called Enterprise.
One can dream, eh?
No.. not rehashing the Alpha Quadrant 'heroes' they've had their time..
That certainly would have been a better story for Kes.Then have it turn out that the Female Caretaker brought the 8472 to our Universe as an experiment, and she's the last bad guy of the series. She's beaten, Kes ascends and becomes the new Caretaker and vows to look after the Delta Quadrant properly because with the Borg and 8472 aliens gone the other species are at peace. She sends Voyager home.
The end of Voyager was the end of 24th century stories. It would have been fitting to have all 3 concurrent shows lead into reunion / combo / mini series of sorts, celebrating all of 24th century/BnB Trek before leaving the air.
Enterprise then should have been done by completely different people.
Actually, the OP is the main reason I stopped watching after Season 1.It's very easy to look back on something and say oh they just should have done this or that
Or if your creative team isn't cranking out paint-by-the-numbers formula-based screenplays that apply a veneer of sophistication for sophistication's sake.This is what makes the "Lost Ship" thing not very viable for the Trekverse. It only really works when you deal with an empty Universe like in NuBSG.
Since I'm not asking for 7 years of conflict, or that it interfere with DS9 or be "DS9 lite" or "DS9 2.0" then most of these points I agree with.Which, sadly, is only really viable for one or two seasons. After that it just gets repetitive. Especially knowing that they'll never make it home before the shows ends otherwise it would mess up DS9's storyline too much.
And the crews couldn't stay antagonistic for 7 years straight, because that's just silly. DS9 had Sisko in conflict with Kira and Odo, and resolved it within ONE season to no complaints. Voyager's situation was one wherein anyone sane would realize that fighting against the only familiar faces around while everyone else wants to kill you would be a bad idea.
Now, if they had waited until DS9 was over and thus had complete access to the rest of the Trekverse instead of being stuck on their own then they could wrap up the opening plot a season or two in and have something big and cool like a big Galactic Invasion that threatens the Alpha Quadrant as well so Voyager has to get the Delta Aliens to work together to stop it.
Let's be real-I watched Voyager when it first aired, and was not engaged with the characters of it or DS9. When I tried again, in seasons later, it didn't feel like much had changed, that it was the same story and so other things took my interest.You would find that utterly impossible let's get real, lol. Why enjoy something when trashing and flaming is more fun?
I was tempted to read.. but I thought it would be a diatribe about resources and continuity and arcs and arks and barks and farts and all that tiresome critiquing that has been said repetitively in this thread any way. Like over and over and over. Is there a class for you vaulted Trek fans or whatever you define yourselves as? Like a mantra you all like to pass around? A kind of hit list? Go on admit it even you didn't read the whole tiresome thread.
I'm only going by what you are sharing here for discussion. I responded to you saying you wanted to shut up and enjoy the show.Let's be real-I watched Voyager when it first aired, and was not engaged with the characters of it or DS9. When I tried again, in seasons later, it didn't feel like much had changed, that it was the same story and so other things took my interest.
I at least appreciate the discussion from @Prax and @Sophie74656 who are making points that are making me rethink Voyager.
Please do me a favor, though, and don't presume my thinking.
So, the assumption is its more fun for me to point out things that I don't like?I'm only going by what you are sharing here for discussion. I responded to you saying you wanted to shut up and enjoy the show.
I don't actually give a shit about continuity. Or canon, for that matter. I'm honestly recalling that first night of UPN's (in hindsight, hilariously tragic) existence when I sat down to watch a new Star Trek show and thinking "Cool episode, nice ship, good music... who the HELL is writing this dialog?"I was tempted to read.. but I thought it would be a diatribe about resources and continuity and arcs and arks and barks and farts and all that tiresome critiquing that has been said repetitively in this thread any way.
Got to about page 3. It's the same old shit again and again (kinda like Voyager).Go on admit even you didn't read the whole tiresome thread.
I don't actually give a shit about continuity. Or canon, for that matter. I'm honestly recalling that first night of UPN's (in hindsight, hilariously tragic) existence when I sat down to watch a new Star Trek show and thinking "Cool episode, nice ship, good music... who the HELL is writing this dialog?"
Got to about page 3. It's the same old shit again and again (kinda like Voyager).
My point, however, is that the structure of the stories THEMSELVES lacked imagination. If the basic external conflict is inexplicable gibberish, and then the SOLUTION is inexplicable gibberish, then you've just told me a story I do not really understand and can't relate to and therefore have NO REASON to care about. Give me a bunch of those kinds of stories in a row, and I'll pretty much stop listening to you forever.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.