Its a nice bridge between Enterprise and TOS. (before we get Discovery)
BUT WE DON'T SEE THE BRI- I'll get me coat.
Its a nice bridge between Enterprise and TOS. (before we get Discovery)
I don't think I can read FFF again. I've done it a couple of times and it affected my life detrimentally. Or something.It was cheaper to build studio than rent one:
http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/02/17...oductions-to-build-a-studio-than-to-rent-one/
Also financial report could be out next week.
As it turns out, not so much.It was cheaper to build studio than rent one:
http://fanfilmfactor.com/2017/02/17...oductions-to-build-a-studio-than-to-rent-one/
Also financial report could be out next week.
The part that kills me are the assumptions without support. I mean, how difficult and time-consuming would it be to call or email or send a contact form or just look at a website for a studio facility and get their day rates?As it turns out, not so much.
In his latest Fan Film Factor blog, Axanar surrogate Jonathan Lane tries to make the case that building a studio was ultimately cheaper than if Alec Peters had rented the necessary facility. Trouble is, Jonathan's numbers and assumptions don't reflect the reality of the L.A. market. Not to mention that simply renting would have saved time over the STILL incomplete studio, and delivered Axanar at the promised feature length back when fan films could still do that.
Fortunately, Jody Wheeler is, unlike Jonathan, a real-life independent film producer. He did a real-world analysis
of studio costs last year for 1701News that's worth checking out and comparing with the inflated estimates on FFF.
Jody updated his calculations today on the AxaMonitor Facebook page.
As for the "independent" financial report, Peters said it was due next week three weeks ago so don't hold your breath.
Nah, I don't read it anymore either. While I defend his right to continue to advocate for his puzzling to me support of whateverthisisnow, I do find the rhetoric merely repetitious now. With such spins on, um, data, that has now reached the point for me as making him look like he is, well to me I mean, maybe caught in a misguided Believer's vortex I guess. Plus I 'think' I'm correct in remembering him mentioning a minuscule monetary income from the clicks to/on the site which if that is true I find I am not willing to click on anything there anymore to support even the tiniest income my click might provide just to see what I believe is only ongoing regurgitated rhetoric. His POV insight was indeed valuable to me during the 'before it settled' as a window into the reasonings of my counterparts to get better understanding. 'After it settled' his writings there began to seem desperate. For continued attention I mean. At least to me anyway. Wanted attention is neurologically super addictive when you're getting it. Anyway, I don't read that blog anymore.I don't think I can read FFF again..
Could...........but I would bet it won't be. Hasn't he been talking about that for months now?Also financial report could be out next week.
AgreeThe part that kills me are the assumptions without support. I mean, how difficult and time-consuming would it be to call or email or send a contact form or just look at a website for a studio facility and get their day rates?
Yup.But in the LA filming zone, you can scarcely throw a rock without hitting a studio. And even if Axa needed some monumentally huge (yuge!) studio, surely they did not need it for every second of that production.
There are now brain studies that show Significant Differences in spending responses to Given/Easy money vs Earned money for just everyday people. And were a person to have a predisposition for and history of self entitlement, a demonstrable need for adulation, poor judgment, few skills, and a Surprise cash cow.....It's a lot easier to think of ways to pinch pennies when it's your own money. When you don't think it is, when it feels like mad money, then it's easier to get the Cadillac when the Honda works just as well.
I'd like to take a minute and consider if it's the size of the payment or what you get done with it that counts....And in the continuing saga of Axanar surrogate Jonathan Lane contorting himself to justify the folly of wasting donor money on an apparently failing commercial business, there's this claim about Renegades. @Tom, any truth to Lane's quoting below of Renegades' studio costs?
![]()
Lane doesn't ned to seek out a Producer to find Studio/Soundstage rental rates in the Los Angeles area - there's a website that SHOWS you can rest a fully functional studio (with a working Greenscreen) for between $1300 - $1800 a day (some including a production manager and lighting kits, etc.)
http://www.affordablesoundstages.com/
Excellent. I can't wait for someone else to read FFF and then post his response on here!This! This! This!
Yes, I know, you have to drive to some of these (quelle horreur!). So do it. Even if you bill out at $100/hour for three production people for, say, a three-hour commute on a daily basis (an exorbitant rate, I might add), we are still talking about $550 - $2175/day. Actor day rates don't change so don't add them in.
- Here's one with film production rates of $1500/day or $150/hour in case you don't need a full day: http://evidencefilmstudios.com/rates/
- Here's one for $1000/day for stage, $1750/day for pre-lit and green (I assume they mean green screening) and $600/day for build/prep/strike. Air/heat is $100/day: http://www.digitalfilmstudios.com/wp2/studios/studio-rate-sheet/
- Here's one for $950/day and $600/half-day, hourly rate of $125 with a 2-hour minimum: http://www.monkspace.com/pricing.html
- Variable rates here depending upon how many people you need in the crew, including going without. Day rates range from $250 (BYO crew and equipment; it was the cheapest rate I found) to $1875 (basic equipment and up to 2 crew members - this was the most expensive rate I found): http://openmediafoundation.org/studiorates
- Hourly rates only for this one, $65 - $75, depends on how many people are in the shoot (expensive but partial days would be somewhat economical): http://www.ostrichstudio.com/pricing/
'Tis a far cry from the quoted $15,000/day.
~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Mr. Lane,
You have said very kind things about me, and I do appreciate it. However, here, please note, I (along with other folks, BTW) have done your homework for you. Which, I am certain, you would not find acceptable if anyone you knew was to have someone do their homework for them, right?
But be that as it may, these figures are out there, and anyone can yell all they want to and scream 'Hater!' and other such juvenile nonsense, but I hardly think any of these studios - none of which I had heard of before just now - could be referred to as a hater. I am certain they do not have any sort of an opinion about AP or Axa or anything else within your or my purview.
While it may be possible to cherry-pick a few things, to nitpick and say that this one and that studio would not be suitable for your needs, my research took me all of ten minutes and I got back over 2.6 million hits on Google. Hence even if all five of my selections come up short, and so do @Noname Given 's and @Jody Wheeler 's, surely you can find an acceptable solution on your own, without bothering your producer friend and without purchasing a white elephant studio way off the beaten path for most talent.
And here's a search for you, too: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=film+studio+day+rates+in+los+angeles
The truth exists. Please don't varnish it with a desire to make Axa or AP (or both) somehow look good for what is, at bottom, a monumentally poor business decision. These numbers do not lie.
Sincerely, Janet Gershen-Siegel
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.