Cool cover! I'm looking forward to this story.
Agreed. I thought the last issue ended very abruptly, too. Both of these issues had nice setups, but they read like Byrne got to page 30 and then suddenly remembered he had to wrap things up. I never got an especially good sense of just what went down between Sam Kirk and Finer or why the Kirk brothers had problems with each other. A flashback towards the end might have helped.Only two downsides to this tale; I felt the story ended too abruptly, with Sam just transporting off;
It's not just you. Dim printing and lack of contrast is my #1 complaint about New Visions. Sometimes I can't even pick out the figures in a panel (The panel at the bottom of pg. 31 was particularly bad in this issue). I attribute it to Byrne doing things that look good on his computer screen without anyone checking to see how it will look when it's printed. If they upped the brightness and contrast by 10-20%, the book would read a lot better.Second problem: my copy, at least had a murky print, leaving scenes dim or dark; not allowing the great detail work on JB's Klingon interiors to show through. But maybe it was just my copy.
JB stated on his Forum that he sends his scans to IDW not original files. Would this have some to do with the murkiness of the final print? Don't know enough to speculate further. It was the only downside to a pretty good issue.I attribute it to Byrne doing things that look good on his computer screen without anyone checking to see how it will look when it's printed. If they upped the brightness and contrast by 10-20%, the book would read a lot better.
He has to be sending digital files to IDW. There's literally no other way he could do it. They're the only thing that would be high-res enough for printing (typically at least 300-400 dpi). And he recently said he was sending Chris Ryall patches to correct a stardate in the latest issue for when it's reprinted in trade.JB stated on his Forum that he sends his scans to IDW not original files. Would this have some to do with the murkiness of the final print?
I'm thinking that's likely, too. Those robot things on the cover look pretty Dalek-ish. When someone on his Forum mentioned the Doctor, Byrne replied "Doctor... who?" Byrne also has a "Doctor Who" section on the Forum, so apparently he's a fan. And in the preview pages at the end of #14, the Enterprise crew beams over to a vessel that's apparently bigger on the inside...JB also seems to hinting that next issue "The Traveller" may be a "Doctor Who"-ish tale. Not up on the "Who" so I'll keep an open mind.
Apparently he did "cast" someone who fell through so he had to "recast". Does he know any the most recent actors who've played the Time Lord? Not sure.The really intriguing question is, who will play the role of the Traveler?
Yeah, I noticed that the initial stardate in the issue would fall waaaaay back in the first season, probably circa "Balance of Terror," not post-"Errand of Mercy" (and pre-"Operation--Annihilate!"). Is this the stardate Byrne wants to fix for the TPB reprint?And he recently said he was sending Chris Ryall patches to correct a stardate in the latest issue for when it's reprinted in trade.
Yes. He discusses it a bit on his thread about New Visions starting on this page.Yeah, I noticed that the initial stardate in the issue would fall waaaaay back in the first season, probably circa "Balance of Terror," not post-"Errand of Mercy" (and pre-"Operation--Annihilate!"). Is this the stardate Byrne wants to fix for the TPB reprint?
I would guess no, since Byrne has very little interest in the TNG era.So does the title not refer to Wesley's friend played by Eric Menyuk? I had just assumed that Enterprise was going to be running into him somewhere.
Didn't he do a Borg story?Yes. He discusses it a bit on his thread about New Visions starting on this page.
I would guess no, since Byrne has very little interest in the TNG era.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.