Great thread
I've mentioned in other threads before, but I quite like the idea that the Klingon Empire underwent a revolution in this era (paralleling 20th century European states such as Germany and Italy) - maybe around 2200. It might go some way to explaining why their culture was slightly different in TOS. Perhaps for about 90 years or so, they became more like the Klingons of John M Ford - an empire which was nicely described by the ship's computer in the video game Star Trek: Judgement Rites as believing "in survival of the fittest". Then they had a counterrevolution before TNG, which explains how they are seemingly more reactionary and atavistic.
![]()
![]()
I think it would be a mistake to include the Cardassians or the Breen.
Maybe more of a "utopian-what-n-be," I'd prefer more pragmatic society Federation, with individuals who aspire to a utopian vision, but with others to whom utopia isn't a priority.The federation would still be more of a Utopian society, but I think we would see more of the darker side of it.
The PD is great for ethical dilemma story lines, but the PD shouldn't be carved in stone, and it should be clear that there are situations (mission objectives, lives of Federation citizens) where the PD can be "legally" pushed to the side.The Prime Directive is more of a guideline.
I wouldn't mind a Picard style "preacher" in the mix of officers, as long as there can be a counter-part within the main group of Starfleet officers to occasional stand up with a opposing position.Picard like monologues of how they must uphold the virtues of the federation are a thing of the past.... or future.
Yes please.there would probably be more infighting within the federation
The idea of having all the variations of Klingons that we've seen including the augment virus versions simply allows for intra-species conflict..
Sounds like the 24th century, the Federation always seemed to be fighting someone, or they were in a negotiations towards a treaty, or they had a couple of years before fought a border war.The United Federation of Planets in Discovery is in a state of perpetual war.
We have seen in the past that Klingons can be remarkably pragmatic about fighting to preserve their Empire. "Nothing is more honorable than victory" was the regretful response provided by Worf for how the Klingon Defence Force could engage in tactics so contrary to the Klingon's stated sense of fair play or honor. TOS seems to me like a time when the Klingon Empire could be shown as being at it's utmost practical extreme - having rejected any doctrine inimical to victory.
If the show focuses on realistic state vs. state brinkmanship and politics, as opposed to the silly TV preoccupation with rogue genius millionaires, artisan serial killers, and other bullshit, then a perfect foil for the Federation, and a prefect, even poetic way to induce dramatic conflict between the two powers, is to have the Klingon State reach for realistic military and tactical advantages, threatening to send the balance of power out of the window. Perhaps Starfleet can also be guilty of the same, to an extent.
For example, if they have adopted some kind of fascist ideology in this time period, it would not be incongruous for them to be engaging in mass eugenics - something that a Federation strike team might try to prevent, by going in under stealth, and destroying the mass testing and cloning facility responsible for the project. It would go some way toward beefing up the ridge issue from being merely a slightly silly story-line, showing it was not merely a matter of some rogue general and a room full of six guys in ENT, but became a state policy that Worf and others may not wish to recall.
It provides the show with the means to engender things like Klingon dissidents who object to their government on moral grounds, when they see the full revelation of what the state is capable of; argue with other Klingons who take a different philosophical position.
As I've said in the past, Klingons definatly cannot be a "biker gang" or a barbarian "warrior aristocracy", they need a state, an industrial base, workers, a knowledge of warp field dynamics, etc:
Rationality wins wars. Armies are some of the most 'hard rationalist' of organizations. They will make their soldiers do things that might not be glamorous, if it improves the chances of winning and survival. A soldier might have to eat local insect wildlife, in order to survive in conditions where supply lines are poor. Religious dietary requirements and other romantic notions fly right out of the window. They wear practical fabrics, carry practical weapons, and don't do things for glamour. If a Klingon commander tells troops to 'cook' their gagh in order to release more useful protein for digestion, they will have to do it. If they are issued standard bars of field rations, that contain some unpalatable formula, they must eat them.
![]()
Roman troops were able to construct an 18 kilometer long 4 meter high double-wall around Alesia in three weeks, in order to starve the Gauls out. But that is why they were the greatest fighting force of their age - the ability to dig a latrine is more important than yelling loud in empire building.
![]()
![]()
![]()
The fact of the matter is that for the Klingons to have ever built a colonial empire in the first place, they must have been practical and disciplined, rather than relying on martial arts. So TOS Klingons were quite realistic, whereas some later episodes that tried to depict them as being strong out of ferocity were missing the mark. Empires are inherently quite opportunist, but even discounting that, like Rome, which would dig a trench round a town and starve the enemy rather than rush in, it requires organization rather than fanaticism.
The British Empire ruled 1/4th of humanity - but among 40 million Britons (vs 400 million Indians) - still 99.9% of Britons were workers. Qo'noS will undoubtedly be the same as England was, with industrial bases like Manchester or Liverpool were in those times.... Except in the 20th century power became even more dependent on science and industry in organized coordination. Modern states cannot survive without a scientific base of researchers and white collar workers.
If Klingons are in fact 8 billion warriors, why haven't they overrun the galaxy? So if they are basically a complete parody of a warrior society, like Orks in Warhammer 40,000 - with an army of billions - the Federation would literally not stand a chance, with its few million servicemen. Not to mention it would be inappropriate to the setting, and boring (another prosaic mindless character-less alien horde, like something out of Halo).
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Klingon Empire cannot function like a Z-canon parody of a biker gang, through extortion alone (thank god no official source has ever suggested this). It cannot simply "get" aliens to research and build D7 battlecruisers for it; it has to understand the principles of duotronic circuitry, and a thousand other scientific concepts. It cannot coerce Mizarian white collar workers to plan how natural resources get from 20 different planets to one shipyard. It cannot order a third species to simply build these things from a blueprint. It needs an industrial/economic/scientific base of its own.
The Mongols, in their early days, did sometimes hire Chinese siege engineers to help them in their campaigns - but this was a 13th century society; and even they were more complex than that. What race is going to come to Qo'noS and dig anti-orbital bombardment bunkers, set up long range sensor nets, and construct orbital starbases for them? Are we to seriously believe the Federation would ally with a culture that transplanted alien slaves to clean Qo'noS's sewer systems?
What you suggest is more akin to Oceania from 1984. The Federation is not like that, and never has been.
And a de facto state of war with the Borg.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.