CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Discussion in 'Fan Productions' started by Richard Baker, Dec 30, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. carlosp

    carlosp Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2003
    Location:
    Seattle
    On his blog, Bjorn Munson posted an incisive and humorous summary of the state of the Axanar case, and its repercussions. It's totally worth a read. Here's one of my favorite parts:
    I’m also not holding out hope that Axanar and their defense team will settle. Either because they sincerely believe some faulty legal logic that they can use Star Trek IP, or they’re hoping some long con bears fruit, they see no profit in calling it quits. Their hubris has helped decimate an entire ecosystem of fan productions.

    [​IMG]
     
    mos6507, wtriker1701, lurok and 10 others like this.
  2. carlosp

    carlosp Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2003
    Location:
    Seattle
    You're conflating two entirely different things. Fan films — original works (though admittedly still infringing) — are a far cry from direct copying that was prevalent on the 90s-era websites to which you refer. Yes, Paramount came down hard on such websites. But it has never treated fan films similarly because they were unlike many of the copying/infringing activities you cite through which people were earning money. Fan films weren't supposed to (until Axanar, of course).

    Paramount/CBS didn't "throttle back" anything with regard to fan films. I know that because I was producing them in the early 2000s. And your explanation that this was due to Enterprise's cancellation is a convenient retcon. Star Trek fan films were thriving, untrammeled by studio legal action, before, during and after Enterprise.

    And I hate to blow up your dubious legal theory, but the principle of fair use predates Paramount's 90s-era crackdown by a couple centuries in common law until it was incorporated into the Copyright Act of 1976. And while Star Trek has certainly contributed to evolving copyright case law, none of those cases are tied to the 90s-era crackdown. I suspect your own website's experience at that time may have colored your perception of what indeed triggers legal action from the studios against Star Trek fan films.

    Also, in what way is it "convenient" that CBS' new series takes place in the same prime universe as Axanar? That universe is the only one to which CBS owns the rights, so what else are they supposed to do?

    Also, Axanar does not take place in the "exact same timeframe" as Discovery. The supposed (and non-canonical) Four Years War took place 10 years before the year in which Discovery is set. This "Discovery stole Axanar's idea" narrative is a canard utterly unsupported by anything resembling facts.

    I would love to see what facts you can produce to bolster your contention that Paramount/CBS are up to "old tricks" — a dubious proposition since until Axanar they had pursued no such litigation against fan films.

    And the idea that Axanar represented "low hanging fruit" is patently absurd. Low hanging fruit doesn't cost the hundreds of thousands of dollars CBS/Paramount are spending in defending their Star Trek copyrights against Axanar's infringement. If Axanar's fruit is hanging low, it's only from the weight of the $1.4 million Alec Peters raised (and spent) without ever producing the promised feature film.

    CBS/Paramount's past litigiousness focused on people trying to make money off their intellectual property. Fan films never really posed that kind of threat. Until Axanar. So the studios' lawsuit is in keeping with their long-standing practice of pursuing people trying to make a buck (or a million) off Star Trek.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2017
  3. Indysolo

    Indysolo Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Location:
    Sunny California
    Did someone say, "Cash"?

    [​IMG]

    Neil
     
    dmac, mos6507, wtriker1701 and 15 others like this.
  4. CaptGrumpy

    CaptGrumpy Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Location:
    The state of Confusion
    TOTALLY WORTH THE WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  5. Indysolo

    Indysolo Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Location:
    Sunny California
    Did someone else say, "Cash"?

    [​IMG]

    Neil
     
    mos6507, wtriker1701, BillJ and 8 others like this.
  6. jespah

    jespah Taller than a Hobbit Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, the Gateway to the Galaxy
    <3
     
    Red Shirt, Harvey and Indysolo like this.
  7. Ryan Thomas Riddle

    Ryan Thomas Riddle Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    @Indysolo, you are a national treasure.
     
  8. trynda1701

    trynda1701 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the darkest reaches of the Universe!
    Yaaaaaaaaaaay! And now back to the topic on hand!:techman::beer:
     
  9. Firebird

    Firebird Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Location:
    On the Cinerama screen, in glorious Technicolor.
    May the Great Bird of the Galaxy bless your planet, Neil.
     
  10. Red Shirt

    Red Shirt Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Whew, I was starting to get worried. Now all is right with the cosmos. :beer:
     
  11. Red Shirt

    Red Shirt Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Great blog post, thanks for linking it.
     
    wtriker1701 likes this.
  12. ThankYouGeneR

    ThankYouGeneR Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2015
    Reading Mr. Munson's blog post was like reading someone who was channeling my own thoughts :lol: on this whole thing. A highly quotable blog post in both its clearly researched accuracy of information and its equanimity in presentation.
    This is the one (among oh so many others) that I'm offering here:
    Indeed.
    The complete line is 'Whom gods destroy they first make mad'. How apt and foretelling the title of our Garth of Izar episode feels now.
    Life imitating art. Fascinating
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2017
  13. RedForman

    RedForman Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2016
    Location:
    Up your ass with my foot
    Red Shirt and wtriker1701 like this.
  14. Admiral Cain

    Admiral Cain Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Totally getting my ten bucks' worth
     
    Red Shirt, wtriker1701, lurok and 2 others like this.
  15. jespah

    jespah Taller than a Hobbit Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, the Gateway to the Galaxy
    Current US Supreme Court docket (actually, it's October 2016 - 2017):
    https://ballotpedia.org/Supreme_Court_cases,_October_term_2016-2017

    Here's a copyright case they heard recently: https://ballotpedia.org/Star_Athletica_LLC_v._Varsity_Brands
    In Star Athletica, the issue was of designs on cheerleading uniforms. The issue before the court was, "What is the appropriate test to determine when a feature of a useful article can be identified separately from the article itself and, therefore, can be protected under the Copyright Act?"

    It's awaiting decision. At the lower court, appellant Star Athletica lost and was found to be infringing. This case is pretty similar to the uniform designs portion of the Axa case.
     
    Admiral Cain likes this.
  16. Tom

    Tom Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Location:
    In your Mind!
  17. jamestyler

    jamestyler Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    "The Supreme Court has just agreed to hear a case involving a 2014 Star Trek fan film called Axanar…"

    It's 2017. Still no film. One paragraph in and he's annoyed me already.

    Two paragraphs in and he still sounds like a shopping network. I do want to try and at least get through the Axanar side of the tale, manufactured or not, but he reads like Don West selling trading cards.

    Edit: skipped to the end and now Axanar's of national importance? Bloody hell.`
     
    Red Shirt, wtriker1701 and KennyB like this.
  18. KennyB

    KennyB I have spoken............ Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2001
    Location:
    Tokyo Japan
    I can't even make myself attempt to read anything from Slow Lane or Charles Britto anymore............it burns my soul.
     
  19. jespah

    jespah Taller than a Hobbit Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, the Gateway to the Galaxy
    Gadzooks.

    It is not a constitutional case. It doesn't deny AP his right to a trial by jury. The judge was absolutely within his rights to rule on fair use. This is not a good test case. Cripes.
     
  20. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    This is Donald Trump's America. Where you need to be a success whatever the cost.
     
    Admiral Cain likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.