Ooh, that clip reminds me of in one of the novels when Thrawn executed a conscripted bridge crewman for incompetence.
The first thing that came to my mind was actually that scene in 'Schindler's List' where the supervisors time a worker in his task, then point out if he's so efficient, why has he completed so few units?Ooh, that clip reminds me of in one of the novels when Thrawn executed a conscripted bridge crewman for incompetence.
I do recall that scene from the Thrawn trilogy but IIRC that had a very different connotation. First of all he had his bodyguard execute a crew member, thus demonstrating that unlike Vader, Thrawn never sullied his own hands with violence and secondly, he did so because the crewman tried to shift blame for his own failing to his training officer. At least I think that was the reason.
I'm only going on half-remembered things, but as I recall, after a target ship escaped Thrawn approached the crewman in question, a technician operating the tractor beam and his supervising officer. Thrawn asked the crewman for an explanation, the crewman gives him some excuse. Thrawn, having worked learned the crewman was conscripted grills the supervising officer if that meant he was treated differently during training, the officer says he trains everyone equally regardless if they enlisted of their own will or were conscripted. Thrawn then deduces the crewman must be the problem and kills him, or maybe he did have his bodyguard kill him.I do recall that scene from the Thrawn trilogy but IIRC that had a very different connotation. First of all he had his bodyguard execute a crew member, thus demonstrating that unlike Vader, Thrawn never sullied his own hands with violence and secondly, he did so because the crewman tried to shift blame for his own failing to his training officer. At least I think that was the reason.
The one Thrawn lets live (even promotes if I recall) was the officer that let the target ship escape, but has attempted to compensate with something unique, prompting Thrawn to see to it the man got time to work on this theory for the glory of the Empire.
Okay, Wow!
More old is new canon.
If fighters can have shields, though, why don't they as a rule? I can buy the Empire being that callous about the lives of its pilots, but what's the Rebellion's excuse? Maybe they don't have the technology to miniaturize a shield generator or balance its power with fighter engines/weapons effectively?
So not only does stormtrooper armor do nothing against blaster bolts, their helmets don't protect against a fist to the face. ...Okay.
So not only does stormtrooper armor do nothing against blaster bolts, their helmets don't protect against a fist to the face. ...Okay.
These TIE Interceptors are going to be in Rogue One and will have shields, and this episode is a tie-in to the movie.
The new TIE Defender, in the old TIE Fighter game from LucasArts back in the 1990s
Also confirmed that the TIE Fighter series don't have shields.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.