They won't, regeneration episodes are media events and ratings-builders. BBC knows this.It's part of the excitement and history of the series to see how each one is done. I hope they don't go that route.
They won't, regeneration episodes are media events and ratings-builders. BBC knows this.It's part of the excitement and history of the series to see how each one is done. I hope they don't go that route.
How many Christmas regnerations have we had any way?
"The Time of the Doctor" is the only one that springs to mind
Well, "The Christmas Invasion" happened immediately after a regeneration.
From a story point of view yes, but the regeneration was months previous to that.
Am I right in thinking the only classic Docs who arrived before the end of a season were Two and Six?
But, I do highly dislike the idea of an unseen regeneration. They should be shown. It's part of the excitement and history of the series to see how each one is done. I hope they don't go that route.
New show runner, new Doctor, new companion, new writers, new directors, new format please.
Yeah, new format. No more 45 minute single episodes or 75 minute 'specials'. Something...else !
Given that will be Chibnall's first episode as showrunner, it seems unfair to saddle him with writing out the previous Doctor right out of the gate.I wonder how feasible it'd be to have the regeneration in the first episode of Series 11?
The General was laying down when he regenerated in Hell Bent last year.Personally, what I'd like to see the end of are the "standup" regenerations of the modern era. Those never made sense to me. Time Lords regenerate when they're dying, when their bodies are failing and on the brink of death and the only way to survive is a complete reboot. So a Time Lord on the brink of regeneration should not be physically capable of standing upright. It just makes no sense.
Absolutely. It made some sense with The Ninth Doctor, but after that it was ridiculous, especially The Master's regeneration.Personally, what I'd like to see the end of are the "standup" regenerations of the modern era. Those never made sense to me. Time Lords regenerate when they're dying, when their bodies are failing and on the brink of death and the only way to survive is a complete reboot. So a Time Lord on the brink of regeneration should not be physically capable of standing upright. It just makes no sense.
As much as I would like a change in format (I really do miss the serial format), I also don't see it happening. Television viewers and even fans are much more accustomed to the 45-minute format now.I think we'll have the 45 minute format for the foreseeable future. While I think a Dickensian format (20 half hour episodes) would be fascinating structurally and harken back to the series' roots, I'm skeptical the viewing audience would really support it.New show runner, new Doctor, new companion, new writers, new directors, new format please.
Yeah, new format. No more 45 minute single episodes or 75 minute 'specials'. Something...else !
Which was refreshing, but only one case. Hopefully it's a sign of returning to the old way but somehow I doubt it.Given that will be Chibnall's first episode as showrunner, it seems unfair to saddle him with writing out the previous Doctor right out of the gate.
The General was laying down when he regenerated in Hell Bent last year.
Given that will be Chibnall's first episode as showrunner, it seems unfair to saddle him with writing out the previous Doctor right out of the gate.
Personally, what I'd like to see the end of are the "standup" regenerations of the modern era. Those never made sense to me. Time Lords regenerate when they're dying, when their bodies are failing and on the brink of death and the only way to survive is a complete reboot. So a Time Lord on the brink of regeneration should not be physically capable of standing upright. It just makes no sense.
Yes, I'm not liking the 25 minutes a week dribble we're getting for the Power of the Daleks on BBCA!I think we'll have the 45 minute format for the foreseeable future. While I think a Dickensian format (20 half hour episodes) would be fascinating structurally and harken back to the series' roots, I'm skeptical the viewing audience would really support it.
I think the stories with the 9th Doctor were my favorite, and Tenant was my favorite Doctor (of nuWho. Only watched a couple of classics).I just want the show to....change. Really change.
RTD's era was full of groanable stupidity (mostly written by him) and Moffat has improved things somewhat. Not as much as I'd have liked, but somewhat.
However, much as I like Capaldi, the preview of what looks like another awful Christmas episode has brought home to me just how little I care for Who these days. I really couldn't give a stuff.
New show runner, new Doctor, new companion, new writers, new directors, new format please.
Yeah, new format. No more 45 minute single episodes or 75 minute 'specials'. Something...else !
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.