• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Moffat talks Bollocks

Wow, I'm really disappointed Moffat thinks that way. I completely disagree and I would argue Ian, Jamie, Turlough, and Rory are some of the best companions, as well as the Brigadier and Mike Yates (companion status disputed).
 
Wow, I'm really disappointed Moffat thinks that way. I completely disagree and I would argue Ian, Jamie, Turlough, and Rory are some of the best companions, as well as the Brigadier and Mike Yates (companion status disputed).
I agree - and Roryr is one of his very own creations, too!
 
The more Moffat does/says things, the more I want a new showrunner. I mean, I liked Series 9 fairly well, and I'm going into Series 10 with an open mind, but Chibnall can't take over soon enough for me.
 
Although I agree that as long as the Doctor is male the primary companion should be female, that doesn't mean there's no room for male companions. Moffat's really bungled this one up. Certainly, the companion Troughton is most often associated with is Jamie, and him being a guy hasn't damaged the Doctor Who franchise at all, so that statement is already shot down. And what's this nonsense about "Male Sci-fi" is about guys in uniform marching and talking about rules? What's he trying to say, that women can't or shouldn't be in the military? That's sexist and offensive.
 
I'd want to read Moffat's full comments in DWM before castigating him based on a few cherry-picked quotes.

I can sort of see what he's saying, that Doctor Who is the anti-Star Trek, anti-Battlestar, anti-Babylon 5. Hell, even anti-SeaQuest and anti-Avengers. But! Science fiction is a heck of a lot more than pseudo-militaristic space opera, and Doctor Who, by virtue of its format can be lots of things, on a story-by-story basis, including pseudo-militarisitic space opera.

I don't see the chain of logic that leads us from "Doctor Who is the anti-Star Trek" to "The Doctor's best friend has to be a woman." It's clear there's a connection in Moffat's mind, based on those quotes and how they're presented, but that connection isn't clear to me at all.
 
Let's be honest here, how many times would you say the Doctor's main companion has been male? I think there's an argument for that just being Jamie. There's Ian yes but it’s hard to disentangle him from Barbara, and there’s a similar issue with Rory (more so given Ian and Barbara were equal companions from the start whereas Rory came and went.) Harry? Well he came in with Sarah Jane already in place so he was an additional companion, and Sarah Jane was still there when he went.

I guess you could say Adric might fit the bill, but even so he was superseded by Nyssa and especially by Tegan once they came into play. There’s Turlough of course, but again Tegan and Nyssa were already in place when he arrived, and though he outlasted them he only outstayed Tegan by a single episode, and even then there was the female presence of Peri knocking around.

I’m not nearly au fait enough with Hartnell to know how Steven and Ben fit into things, so Steven certainly might count alongside Jamie, though surely Ben came as a pair with Polly, much like Ian/Barbara.

Obviously there are male characters who’ve filled a companion role on occasion; The Brig, Mike Yates, Mickey, Jack, Wilf but none of these were the Doctor’s companion in the same way Jo, Leela, Romana, Tegan, Ace, Rose etc. were and from a public perspective the Doctor is a man who travels primarily with a female companion.

Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see another Rory, and certainly another Jamie, but given how strongly people feel about gender balance within tv and films these days and things like the Bechdel test can you imagine how a male Doctor with a single male companion would go down? Of course the easy solution would be a female Doctor with a male companion ;) (Actually how about a female Doctor with a female companion?!)

As for his comments about women, he’s hardly saying anything that different to what you might hear being expressed by people who want to see more women in positions of authority within politics and business precisely because they are perceived to think differently and bring something different to the table.
 
Steven Moffat always strikes me as someone who cannot decide whether he is a traditionalist or a revolutionary feminist. The result is that he fails horribly at being either.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top