Watched episode 5.
I was surprised to see Lawrence so soon after he was killed. So Maybe the William/El Lazo scenes are taking place in a different (earlier) time than MiB/Lawrence ones, and that is how MiB knew Lawrence so well.
So are different parts of the show definitely taking part at different times, or is that all just part of the theories? Remember, I'm just following the conversation here and reading other news bits on other sites., I haven't been able see the actual show yet, so please no sarcastic comments about whether or not I was paying attention.
The more people spout these theories about the show's timelines being wonky, the more it makes me want to question if they're even bothering to pay attention to what the show is actually depicting, because it really is straightforward and simplistic.
One of the repair techs seems to share your confusion.Last night's episode was really good (if a little confusing in places, as I have no idea what was up with Maeve, Dolores, and Lawrence being in numerous places at once)
Why do you think that?There were other guests present in Pariah besides Logan and William.
Yup, I agree 100% with all of that.The writers couldn't have made it more clear that these "multiple timeline" theories are bunk than if they'd hung up a neon sign saying as much.
First of all, the very fact that we see "current" Dolores, newly "awakened" and still evolving beyond her programming, along on the adventure with William and Logan means that we're not dealing with different time periods.
Second, Ford pulls Dolores from Pariah personally (he's disguised as a Day of the Dead reveler and uses the same command phrase that Elsie does in The Original) and then directly references her current circumstances during their cconversation.
Third, Ford's conversation with Dolores reveals to us as an audience that Arnold died 34 years earlier, which, when coupled with the information that he revealed about Arnold in a conversation with Bernard a few episodes ago, establishes that the park has only been operational for between 30 to 34 years, since Arnold's death happened before the park had opened to the public.
Fourth, it is established through their meeting that both Ford and the Man in Black know each others' history intimately and establishing that the Man in Black's association with the park goes back to at least before Arnold's death, even if he's only been coming to the park as a guest for 30 years.
Fifth, we know that Dolores was part of the "first generation" of Hosts and was in operation before Arnold's death, having conversed with him on the day of his death, and we also know that "Old Bill", the Host that Ford talks to in his first scene in The Original and in the very first scene of this episode, is of the "second generation" of Hosts, establishing that the upgrades in the Hosts' technology and appearance, which the Man in Black reveals were done as a cost-saving measure, didn't begin happening until quite some time after the park went operational, therfore making it impossible for Dolores' adventure with William and Logan to be taking place at a different point in time than what we see with regards to the Man in Black and the activities/events transpiring on the "showrunners level" due to the fact that, as noted earlier, we see Dolores in her "current" build and are witnessing her experience things that she could not possibly have experienced prior to her "awakening" in The Original.
I know what the voice said, but I asked who the voice belonged to (actor wise).^ His voice says "may you rest in a deep and dreamless slumber" when Dolores is following that image of herself.
I forgot to mention this earlier: I was genuinely surprised to see the two actors meet at this point. I fully expected to not see them together until near the end of the season's conclusion. I'm glad I was wrong about that and the scene was great.I also loved the scene with Anthony Hopkins and Ed Harris.. two of my all time favorite actors having a chat ala Heat with Pacino/De Niro revealing the motivation of the MiB but i have a feeling that the centre of the Maze will be quite something different than anyone expected, if it exists at all.
Yeah, this whole episode, especially the orgy scenes, felt like "Oh, that's right, we're on HBO! Let's go all out!"- It's an HBO show for sure.. the were pretty modest in the first 4 episodes and have now filled their quota in a most impressive way
I think there's a simpler explanation, as suggested by the Man in Black: It's a fail safe to specifically protect Robert.- Interesting reaction of Teddy when the MIB threatened another human meaning that was a real knife able to hurt or even kill a human but what happens if there is a big story fuckup and 2 humans meet and each thinks of the other as a host and they fight it out without guns?
I also wondered about that, both when he was getting strangled and during the brawl at the end. Is there a safe word or is there some kind of restraint going on?- This asshole friend getting beat up.. is this the hardcore level and do the guests know this is possible? Would they need to sign a special clause that Westworld is not able to be sued for inflicting physical pain or even injuries when venturing out of Noob First Town territory and into the more wild areas? Asshole friend seemed very surprised when the first host decked him and even more so when he got surrounded and beaten up.
The writers couldn't have made it more clear that these "multiple timeline" theories are bunk than if they'd hung up a neon sign saying as much.
I'm assuming that some scenes are flashbacks. The guest and the employee plots seem to more or less in the same time frame. But,not always simultaneous. The Hosts are dealing with what looks like a lot of "internal" plots. We are seeing stuff that happens in their heads.This is all well and good but lawrence/El lazo kinda puts a monkey wrench in it. In episode 4 El lazo was mentioned and Logan planned to ho see him while Lawrence was still alive and well in company of MiB. Now shortly after lawrence dies we see El lazo. Of course this doesnt mean one story line is taking place 30 years ago, it could be a couple of days ago. But it is not happening at the same time, unless you want to propose the 2 Lawrence robots theory
I also wondered about that, both when he was getting strangled and during the brawl at the end. Is there a safe word or is there some kind of restraint going on?
2 Lawrence robots makes more sense than a convoluted multiple timelines theory.This is all well and good but lawrence/El lazo kinda puts a monkey wrench in it. In episode 4 El lazo was mentioned and Logan planned to go see him while Lawrence was still alive and well in company of MiB. Now shortly after lawrence dies we see El lazo. Of course this doesnt mean one story line is taking place 30 years ago, it could be a couple of days ago. But it is not happening at the same time, unless you want to propose the 2 Lawrence robots theory
I wondered if anyone else had noticed, too. A very quick moment that doesn't draw attention to itself. Very LOST-esque.Yes, it seems like a lot is happening in the heads of the androids. After Dolores saw the maze, William and the boss were gone, when she just stood there.
Yeah, I'm wondering if it's a multiple timeline thing or there are multiple version of the hosts maybe all synced up with each other. It would explain Dolores frequently appearing in the park and in the behind the scenes area.2 Lawrence robots makes more sense than a convoluted multiple timelines theory.
When you get insistent that your way is the only way and everyone else are idiots for not noticing the obvious, I just remember that you were literally the last person on Earth who thought Jon Snow was not going to come back and were equally insistent about being right about that all the way up to the episode airing, after he had been seen on set.The more people spout these theories about the show's timelines being wonky, the more it makes me want to question if they're even bothering to pay attention to what the show is actually depicting, because it really is straightforward and simplistic.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.