• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Supergirl - Season 2

When I think of Supergirl and romance, I think of some goofy Silver Age stories about her horse (which was in love with her) and Superman himself (Supergirl used a computer to discover that she was Superman's perfect mate). I can't think of anything more recent.

The Matrix Supergirl, of course, was in a relationship with Lex Luthor's Australian clone.
If I recall correctly, Jimmy Olsen used an alien super-computer to create a "perfect mate" for Superman--before the "cousin from Argo City" version had ever appeared. But the horse thing was rather "goofy".
 
By the way, apparently I'm not the only one who thinks Cat secretly knows Kara is Supergirl, and Andrew Kreisberg hints that it could be the case:

http://www.cbr.com/supergirl-ep-on-whether-cat-grant-knows-karas-secret-identity/

Or not, depending on which way they feel the story should go.

The article also clarifies why they pulled back on Kara/James, and it points out something that hadn't occurred to me: This version of Snapper Carr is basically Lou Grant to Kara's Mary Richards. Except he doesn't yet think she has "spunk."

Oh, gosh, now I'm hoping somebody does a Supergirl/Mary Tyler Moore Show mashup video...

Joan Jett did a nice rocking version of the MTM theme that would fit Supergirl IMO.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
"I'm not telling you my real name."
Oh come now. We can't keep thinking of Cat as a brilliant investigative reporter if she can't tell this is Kara in a blue suit.

On another note, it's nice to hear Cat call Kara Kara instead of Kira. It shows a growth of respect.
 
"I'm not telling you my real name."
Oh come now. We can't keep thinking of Cat as a brilliant investigative reporter if she can't tell this is Kara in a blue suit.

Historically, Commissioner Gordon could not tell Dick Grayson is Robin with just a mark across his eyes, but Gordon is allegedly a great lawman with an incisive mind; almost everyone in Metropolis cannot see Clark's face in Superman's....
 
The show actually addressed that last year in episode 2. James said that Kara didn't have to worry about being recognized as Supergirl for the same reason Clark didn't get recognized as Superman -- because people just don't expect to see the extraordinary in their midst.

In real life, it can be hard to recognize someone out of the context you're used to seeing them in. If you found someone familiar and asked if they were person X and they said no, you'd probably be more likely to go "Oh, sorry, I guess you just look similar" than to go "Aha, you're lying, you're actually X in disguise!" Because how often do we encounter people impersonating other people? It's not really something we expect in everyday life.
 
No, it's actually nothing more than a ridiculous and naive conceit invented by a couple of youngsters selling a cartoon story aimed at young children over seventy-five years ago. God bless its durability. :lol:
 
I've never met Brad Pitt in real life, but I am pretty confident that if he walked up to me with a pair of glasses on I'd recognize him.

Pretty much this.

Perhaps more to the point, if he introduced himself to you and then an hour later walked back into the room wearing glasses and a different outfit you'd probably have no trouble recognizing him.

It's a story, and not one that was designed originally for a sophisticated audience. It's enough to enjoy it for its virtues, and to allow the storytellers the occasional Reeves-ian wink at the audience regarding the silliness...such as last week, when Clark gave voice to the oft-made fan observation that criminals in Superman stories behave in ridiculous ways. "If the bullets don't work, why the punching?" :lol:
 
Pretty much this.

Perhaps more to the point, if he introduced himself to you and then an hour later walked back into the room wearing glasses and a different outfit you'd probably have no trouble recognizing him.

It's a story, and not one that was designed originally for a sophisticated audience. It's enough to enjoy it for its virtues, and to allow the storytellers the occasional Reeves-ian wink at the audience regarding the silliness...such as last week, when Clark gave voice to the oft-made fan observation that criminals in Superman stories behave in ridiculous ways. "If the bullets don't work, why the punching?" :lol:
IDK - I would have LOVED if one of the guys threw their guns, and either Superman or Supergirl ducked out of its path. ;)
 
IDK - I would have LOVED if one of the guys threw their guns, and either Superman or Supergirl ducked out of its path. ;)

That's one of those things that really only happened maybe once in the actual text (i.e. the George Reeves show) but got blown out of proportion by fandom. At least, when I rewatched the show fairly recently, I only noticed it once.
 
You can always just chalk it up to reflexes. Even if you're invulnerable it must take a bit of mental discipline not to flinch when something solid comes flying at your face.
 
Last edited:
But Legends of Tomorrow has a lesbian female lead in Sara Lance, and I don't hear any outcry over that. (We've already heard that Sara's going to be attracted to Supergirl in the big crossover next month.) Not to mention gay supporting characters like Curtis on Arrow and Captain Singh on The Flash. And plenty of other CW shows have had lesbian or bisexual female characters, including The 100, The Vampire Diaries, Jane the Virgin, and Supernatural, although several have been criticized for a tendency to kill off such characters.

So including lesbian/bi characters on yet another CW show would hardly require courage; if anything, it's practically routine by this point, and it's not something the CW's target audience would be likely to have a problem with.

Indeed, next week's Supergirl episode will feature the debut of Maggie Sawyer (Floriana Lima), who's one of DC's most prominent lesbian characters. It's not yet established whether her sexuality will be addressed in the show, but given prior precedent, I expect it'll be acknowledged as casually as it was with characters like Curtis and Singh.

I think most fans believe there will be a relationship between Alex and Maggie. I am thinking that too until we learn anything different. We know those two interact with each other. Plus Alex mentioned not having a date in a long time. I think Kara and Mon-El is more likely.
The Maggie/Alex possibility first came my mind the other day when I saw the first promo picture of them together. The fact that they were drawing so much attention to her lack of a love life in the last episode only makes me more suspicious.
Historically, Commissioner Gordon could not tell Dick Grayson is Robin with just a mark across his eyes, but Gordon is allegedly a great lawman with an incisive mind; almost everyone in Metropolis cannot see Clark's face in Superman's....
I like the idea from Dark Knight Rises that Gordon knew that Batman was Bruce Wayne the whole time, but just didn't say anything until he was about to "die". Or one of the later Arrow episodes where Lance didn't want to know so he could have plausable deniability. I think either one of those options would be preferable to people like Gordon or Lance not being able to figure out who the superhero is.
 
Last edited:
That's because 1.) it's NYC and NYC don't give a fuck 'bout nobody, and 2.) no one is actively trying to uncover who he is.

In the comics it's even a bit more ridiculous now (or at least it was back in the 70s I think; I haven't kept up in years and years) that Clark is a television anchor for the evening news. At least once or twice there had to be a close-up pic of Superman on screen right next to him. And when you're dating/working alongside an investigative reporter who regularly interacts with both Superman and Clark Kent on an intimate one-on-one level, it's even more silly when you can't put two and two together.

That said, I find it a charming conceit of the mythos. You quite literally have to ignore the absurdity and and just accept it for what it is. And I'm totally fine with doing that. Yes, it completely breaks one's suspension of disbelief, but it also leads to some fantastic moments like this one.
 
In the comics it's even a bit more ridiculous now (or at least it was back in the 70s I think; I haven't kept up in years and years) that Clark is a television anchor for the evening news. At least once or twice there had to be a close-up pic of Superman on screen right next to him.
But it was in the '70s comics, while he was a news anchor, that they came up with the passive Super-Hypnosis gimmick. People were literally seeing an altered version of Clark Kent--thinner, receding hairline, etc.
 
For context, this is the version of Superman who could fly interstellar distances at unimaginable speeds, time travel under his own power, and stand on his hands and push the planet.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top