It's been 6+ years. Now that everybody has had the chance to cool off, what do you really think about it?
Is it 2019?It's been 6+ years. Now that everybody has had the chance to cool off, what do you really think about it?
The only thing that bothered me about it was it was so random. The Uhuru underwear scene (and Kirk's) made sense within the context of the storyline. He's in her room, she doesn't know he's there, she changes clothes. This shot was just so...random. Maybe if it had a better context there wouldn't become such a 'thing.'
My issue isn't with whether or not it's explicit. My problem is the nature of that treatment of women -- as eye candy or things for the men (boys?) in the audience to gawk at. I'm a big defender of the Kelvin Timeline, but I could definitely do without that backwards approach to female characters. In fact, we did do without it in Beyond.I've seen racier Kmart ads.
The way women are treated as consumable objects and eye candy in ST09 and STID is probably my least favorite thing about those movies. There's hardly a single major female character who we don't see in their underwear (I honestly don't remember one). It's unnecessarily trying to convince the audience that Star Trek is cool by ramping up its sexiness, but they did it in a vapid, sexist way. It just makes me roll my eyes. Marcus is a brilliant science officer and we do get to see some of that -- but not before we see her boobs. Star Trek ought to know better.
EDIT: And one of the many, many things I loved about Beyond is how it didn't fall into that treating women as eye candy trap.
Right?on Alice Eve's underwear shot, now that the controversy has died down
[let's see if it can be stirred up again]
I agree with you about Beyond. My husband joked that it 'wasn't real Star Trek. Kirk didn't flirt with the alien woman!'
My issue isn't with whether or not it's explicit. My problem is the nature of that treatment of women -- as eye candy or things for the men (boys?) in the audience to gawk at. I'm a big defender of the Kelvin Timeline, but I could definitely do without that backwards approach to female characters. In fact, we did do without it in Beyond.
I don't think any of that "hey, remember Kirk being a ladies man?" stuff is necessary. Quite frankly it's not even all that accurate to TOS -- it's just how people remember TOS. Pretty much every woman that Kirk had a relationship with in TOS, no matter how brief, was someone he genuinely cared about. I mean, he didn't even fool around with any "green women" as the old joke goes. There was an Orion dancer in "Wolf in the Fold" who he just observed, and then Marta in "Whom Gods Destroy" that Kirk didn't show any interest in. I really don't think Kirk deserves that reputation. Now, Riker on the other hand...I guess the plot didn't even allow for him tapping off with her. It was just a nod to say 'yeah folks I'm still a womaniser'
But then again there was the implied threesome scene, so it wasn't that necessary I suppose.
We didn't see her boobs. We saw her abs, for about 2 seconds.but not before we see her boobs.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.