• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Warner Brothers Insults LOTR and Hobbit Fans With ME: UCE

I'm where you are, though I haven't seen this fan-edit you speak of. The Hobbit trilogy was a bloated disappointment and I wouldn't spend a cent on it. What gets me is this, however:



What a mug. You're bitching because you've already spent an unnecessary fortune to satisfy some completeness obsession and now you get your knickers in a twist when this company - knowing you lot are out there - try to squeeze an exorbitant amount out of you in a (perhaps) final effort to milk the franchise? Christ, I would.
Which is why we have things like this.
 
It is annoying, but I still wouldn't call it an insult to the fans.
Bill Hunt explains, better than I can, in a long follow-up post today why it is insulting:
Bill Hunt said:
[Bill lists what "serious collectors" probably already bought] That’ll bring you up to about $650 spent to buy these films on disc by diehard fans over the years. Keep in mind, that doesn’t include theatrical tickets, books, toys, swag, collectibles and whatever else you may have purchased.

And now, Warner is asking you to spend another $800 to re-buy most of those exact same discs just to get the nice new packaging and swag, which every diehard fan would certainly love to have.

That’s why this is insulting.

Then:
But you might be asking: “But this release isn’t targeted at the diehard fans! It’s meant for people who haven’t purchased any of the films on disc yet!” First of all, are you nuts? Second of all, who would those people be exactly that are in the market for an $800 Blu-ray set but aren’t diehard fans?

Bill then mentions Elon Musk as a possible customer of the $800 set, and goes on to demonstrate how to get more for less money:
I did a little window-shopping research and ran the numbers last night. For $799.99, I could – right now on Amazon – buy...

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy – Theatrical Edition BD set ($21.75)
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy – Extended Edition BD set ($48.99)
The Hobbit Trilogy – Theatrical Edition Blu-ray 3D Combo set ($97.89)
The Hobbit Trilogy – Extended Edition Blu-ray 3D Combo set ($106.98)

(And if you add up all those movie and extras discs, that comes to 48 discs of content – which is truly complete – as opposed to this set’s 30.) Plus...

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy 3-CD Soundtrack Collection ($30)
The Hobbit Special Edition soundtrack CDs ($20 each x 3 films = $60)
The “Art of The Lord of the Rings” hardcover books for each film ($44 each x 3 = $132)
The “Art & Design of The Hobbit” hardcover books for each film ($30 each x 3 = $90)
If you’re following along at home (or the office) that comes to a subtotal of $587.61.

That leaves me with $212.38...

... which is almost enough to buy a hand-crafted prop replica of The Hat of Gandalf The freaking Grey from the WETA Workshop too (for $219 – see this link, and yes that’s it pictured up above there on the left side of the page. It’s kind of badass).

And I’ll build my own damn shelf to hold it all.

And Mr. Hunt finishes with:
I will say this from a professional perspective: This may very well be the most misguided release decision I’ve seen a major studio home video operation make in the 20 years I’ve been covering this industry as the editor of The Digital Bits. It really couldn’t be more out of touch with consumers, the fans, and especially the studio’s specific target market for this release.

I am kind of shocked by it, actually.

And I’m not going to lie: It’s also a little bit sad and depressing too, that the industry has come to things this.

Now… as to what the Middle Earth fans I’m hearing from today think about this... well, I don’t want to post exact quotes here, because it’s not pretty...
http://www.digitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/081816_1445

Wow.
 
Well, there are no words to express in this matter. It all feels very overblown. I have no doubt that sales will be bad, complaints will be made and WB will deal with it in some way that will be complained about forever.

Well, it's entertaining, I'll say that much.
 
Yeah, I think that this's all over nothing. So it's an overpriced gift set. They've made them before, they'll be making them again. It's the way things go. Besides, don't most people probably already have these movies, anyways?
 
I agree that it's overpriced but I see no reason to be "insulted" by it. I haven't bought special sets of films or TV shows that I like because box sets are often prohibitively expensive, at least for my budget.

Also, I already have these films.
 
Right. Why bother. What we don't have is everything the "ultimate" collection should have been.

Look, I think "ultimate" is just a sell word to make it sound great. And if you wanted it and its out of your price range, sorry to hear that. Besides, there will never be an "ultimate" version. Years from now, they'll be still releasing new editions, with different bells and whistles.

More to my point is, who was the target audience for this release? Probably the hardcore collectors, not the general fans. I just don't get what the big deal is. It's just the latest frakking movie release that happens to have a lot of physical extras. There are plenty of previous releases that have a lot of additional materials, if that's what you want.
 
Your entire last paragraph says you either haven't read the thread or understand the information if you have.
 
Are you just mad because a couple of people online are mad? These aren't the be all end all of LOTR movies. We're going to see anniversary editions and 4K and whatever else.
 
Mad? Disappointed. I think it's questionable now that any future editions of significance with the promised newly produced content will be released.

To be honest, I think Peter Jackson did a very disappointing job with The Hobbit and that might actually have something to do with the lack of studio enthusiasm. That's not something I've heard anywhere else - just a perception. Or it could instead be endemic to a lack of Warner Brothers studio integrity itself which caused the problems with The Hobbit, and this matter is just more of the same. New Line treated The Lord of the Rings far better.
 
Last edited:
Your entire last paragraph says you either haven't read the thread or understand the information if you have.

Hey, man. I did read the thread and sorry if I misunderstood the point you're making, but I don't think the release you wanted even exists. And if you're point is that the director wanted to make one with more bonus features and that didn't happen, that's the industry. Peter Jackson isn't in charge of those decisions. (And, for what it's worth, while I wouldn't buy this set myself, it is a nice collection.)

Mad? Disappointed. I think it's questionable now that any future editions of significance with the promised newly produced content will be released.

Seriously? These movies are insanely popular. LOTR, at least, is considered a modern classic. This is not the end of new editions of the movie. They will make more.

To be honest, I think Peter Jackson did a very disappointing job with The Hobbit and that might actually have something to do with the lack of studio enthusiasm.

Okay, to be honest, I think that Jackson did a darn good job with the Hobbit movies, esp. considering that the success of the first movie raised unfair expectations for it. But that's all subjective.

That's not something I've heard anywhere else - just a perception. Or it could instead be endemic to a lack of Warner Brothers studio integrity itself which caused the problems with The Hobbit, and this matter is just more of the same. New Line treated The Lord of the Rings far better.

So, Warner Bros. is morally in the wrong for releasing the edition they did rather than another one? That doesn't make any sense.
 
LOTR fans aren't the only ones feeling salty.
http://kotaku.com/the-270-ultimate-version-of-final-fantasy-xv-doesnt-co-1785475246
Maybe this will be a new trend lol
OK this one actually does kind of piss me off. Pretty much every other collector's/ultimate edition of a game like I've seen has included a Season Pass. To expect people to pay $270s for the collector's edition, and then $25 dollars on top of that for the SP is ridiculous. Oh, and before someone tries to say this is a similar situation, no it's not, if that were the case WB would be expecting people to pay again for the new extras.
Bill Hunt explains, better than I can, in a long follow-up post today why it is insulting:


Then:


Bill then mentions Elon Musk as a possible customer of the $800 set, and goes on to demonstrate how to get more for less money:


And Mr. Hunt finishes with:

http://www.digitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/081816_1445

Wow.
I still don't see what's so bad about this, it's not like people are being forced to buy this. If you are such a hardcore fan you must have every version of the movies released, then that's your problem, not Warner's.
 
Mad? Disappointed. I think it's questionable now that any future editions of significance with the promised newly produced content will be released.

To be honest, I think Peter Jackson did a very disappointing job with The Hobbit and that might actually have something to do with the lack of studio enthusiasm. That's not something I've heard anywhere else - just a perception. Or it could instead be endemic to a lack of Warner Brothers studio integrity itself which caused the problems with The Hobbit, and this matter is just more of the same. New Line treated The Lord of the Rings far better.
I'll agree with the point that WB seems utterly uninterested in marketing the Hobbit beyond the bare minimum. My wife is part of theonering.net and the general discussion points of WB mishandling the marketing of the Hobbit films is one that I tend to agree with and might match your perception of studio being disappointed.

I think that the Hobbit was overstretched (nod to Bilbo on that one) in terms of story. It should have been two films and been done with it. Or never made at all.
 
@WebLurker: Again, your points fail to comprehend the issues raised.

I don't think the release you wanted even exists.
Duh...

Peter Jackson isn't in charge of those decisions..
Duh...

These movies are insanely popular.
No kidding.

This is not the end of new editions of the movie. They will make more.
No shit. Repackaging for over-priced swag is the problem.

I think that Jackson did a darn good job with the Hobbit movies
Okay. We disagree. Along with a lot of people who didn't like the video game CGI, lack of physics, juvenile humor, and speculation about what's down dwarf pants. But the topic is not the movies. It's the cynical WB money grab with nothing new.

So, Warner Bros. is morally in the wrong for releasing the edition they did rather than another one? That doesn't make any sense.
Not to you.
 
Last edited:
...it's not like people are being forced to buy this.
True. But they are given no option to obtain the content that was promised. They are instead offered an $800 re-buy of what they already have and some swag.
If you are such a hardcore fan you must have every version of the movies released, then that's your problem, not Warner's.
The point is the collectors do have every version. This is a collector's edition. So who is WB trying to sell this to at $800 with no new content when there is tons of unreleased content that Peter Jackson is interested in producing? And is the casual fan who doesn't have everything yet going to spend $800 to get it with a bookshelf? And even then no 3D, no 4K, no HDR, no theatrical? And when anyone can build their own ultimate collection separately on Amazon for $200 less?
 
Last edited:
People with money who only have the DVDs and want to upgrade, or people who haven't bought them at all, but for some reason have now decided to since they can get all six EEs at one time.
I don't deny it's a could be argued that it's a stupid decision on Warner's part, but I still don't see where it's so horrible or an insult to fans. It's just another overpriced collector's edition.
I'm not the kind of person who has to have every version of a movie released, so I don't really feel a lot of sympathy for people who do. Like I said before, the only way I would buy something I already own is if it's a format upgrade of has some kind of extra I'm absolutely dying for, but if it doesn't have one or both of them I'm not going to spend money on something I already own.
 
My wife is part of theonering.net and the general discussion points of WB mishandling the marketing of the Hobbit films is one that I tend to agree with and might match your perception of studio being disappointed.
An aside: TheOneRing.net is a mutual admiration forum that makes dissenting opinions most unwelcome. Love it or leave it (please!), basically. But it's good to hear they have acknowledged the WB situation to some extent.
 
The running gag of LOTR dvd's having special edition 24 hours of content releases always gets me.

Seriously. What is on the DVD's beside the movie?

-6 hour vlog of one of the hobbit actors sitting in a chair getting makeup applied?

-Peter Jackson's entire flight to New Zealand? Bonus material when he gets something from duty free selection.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top