something fun I thru together.
http://fav.me/dabd91g
Disturbing-er and disturbing-er. More and more. Layer after layer. Year after year.Alec keeps letting people give him stuff in exchange for a chance to attach their own agendas to Star Trek via the Axanar hook. The attorneys want *something*, the libertarians want another context for their ideology, Newsweek wants to sell magazines, some of the Axanar donors want to own a Trek sandbox of their own, some want to dump on the JJVerse, Alec wants a studio, on and on. Everything except just making a fan film and finishing.
Having covered a lot of litigation, I have seen many cases where a party in a legally hopeless position continue to fight for the sake of fighting. It stops being about the money or the substantive issue. It's about avoiding the admission of error or responsibility, no mater what the cost.This I think is the threat the Axanar side wants to play -- the clean simplicity of your studio property has value, and we will just keep making a bigger rolling boulder of $%^& for you to clean up if you drag us into court. Axanar just might be able to get the studios to settle for an undisclosed monetary judgment and a stipulation to GTFO of Trek forever. And claim to donors that the arguments were a valiant attempt to achieve fan ownership, not just to save the studio asset from scorched earth repossession.
Guess it depends whether the studios want to set a precedent that building a competing business off of their IP is guaranteed to be flattened.
Blog post is up (YouTube to follow):
http://www.gandtshow.com/g-t-show-247-star-trek-beyond/
Yes, we mention the SDCC BSG debacle. Egad, can't a completely unrelated panel with them on it go without a mention of this mishigas?
Alec doesn't need to produce much of anything, he has gotten what he wanted over the last 5 years.Disturbing-er and disturbing-er. More and more. Layer after layer. Year after year.
As you say, 'Everything except just making a fan film and finishing.' Since 2012, everything except just making the film. Always a reason, always a rationalization, always an excuse. Never a film.
At this point I don't know if I like it or not. From this teaser it feels undone and I guess it is still a design in progress. THe design that it is based off of is not one of my favorites, but neither was Ent-D when I first saw it as a kid.Sorry for offtopic, but briefly, as a designer, what feelings do you have about the ship? I kind of like that they are referencing an old design, but I just can't help seeing an IDIC. Not that that's bad.
I always enjoy reading your blog.Blog post is up (YouTube to follow):
http://www.gandtshow.com/g-t-show-247-star-trek-beyond/
Yes, we mention the SDCC BSG debacle. Egad, can't a completely unrelated panel with them on it go without a mention of this mishigas?
Quite likely and I'm sure Alec Peters will be one of the first to start banging that particular drum. And some people on the other side of the argument may get quite upset about it because actually there may be a grain of truth in it now but.....If that's the case, I fully expect them to double down on the "CBS killed Axanar because they saw it as competition" line.
something fun I thru together.
http://fav.me/dabd91g
Very nearly the same thing happened at WonderCon. A BSG panel with Hatch and Alec Peters. I didn't go, so I don't know if it turned into an Axanar discussion, but whereever Hatch goes these days, just like the shit-stained toilet paper he is, Alec Peters some how managed to cling-on (see what I did there?) and follow Hatch everywhere.
Great, now his greed is gonna spoil it for artists too. Its quite common for artists at cons to do one-offs of owned characters for money and I think the publishers look the other way, I don't think it has fair use defense, I think its just overlooked. Get a major studio pissed off and enforcing copyright and that all will get shut down out of artists' fear.
Exactly. 'Scorched Earth' in action.......(if he can't play in the sandbox, nobody can)
In securities regulation there is something called "affinity fraud." It refers to a scammer exploiting the cultural identity of a group as a mask for their fraud. The most common example of affinity fraud is someone using their membership in a church or religious group to solicit "investors" into a scheme. Usually a figure within the group, such as a pastor, will attest to the scammer's good character and encourage his flock to support the scheme.In some ways its fandom's own fault - our need to have those collectibles or to purchase that swag. He's merely capitalizing on it in any way he can. For every one of us willing to look at the big picture and actually see what Peters has been doing, there seem to be a dozen blind nerds who just want more Trek the way they think it should be, or people like @Warped9, who have very specific ideas about what Trek should be and be about, and will only support those notions (vis a vis Cash Markman's shitty These Are The Voyages Books.) To some, it just doesn't matter what the source of the content is - fraudulent or not - just that there's content that meets their discerning, if fickle, pleasure.
Not being down and widdit I have no idea who Jaylah is and I'm too lazy to Google it (other search engines are available) but that aside this has to be the most tenuous Star Trek related cash-grab I've seen Team Axanar associate themselves with yet. Correct me if I'm wrong but that's just a cartoon dude listening to, er, something?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.