
It's nice to see expanded design families for the Oberth and Excelsior aspects, and I'm inclined to think (per my own headcanon anyway) that many of the V3 ships were entering service around the turn of the 24th century and perhaps at least the first decade or so, when the Excelsior would have proven itself a good workhorse.I just tried Googling it and don't see it. Was it in a book?I don't really mind the military aspects, though I do agree there's a heavy emphasis on those. I think it's logical for Starfleet to build a small number of dedicated tactical vessels like dreadnoughts, and that a dreadnought could easily fill the role of several cruisers or destroyers in a more volatile area of space. I've always rather liked the Huntington class fuel carriers.
Huntingon Class Unlike many of his designs, there doesn't seem to be a separate set of ship sheets for it.Erik has a Facebook page devoted to all sci fi blueprints, so the fun continues.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1407313536255114/
There are garage kits available of some of his designs. I've built a few:
http://www.inpayne.com/models/trek/starcrafts_asmodeus.html
http://www.inpayne.com/models/trek/uss-mchale1.html
http://www.inpayne.com/models/trek/loki1.html
and even kitbashed one of his:
http://www.inpayne.com/models/trek/uss-montefusco.html
A lot of his designs have been inspirations for my own kitbashes.

. And the Kirov sort of takes elements from several of his Excelsior-based dreadnoughts.
The M'Benga could have been cool with more conservative nacelle pylons.
.Come to think of it, I named one of my bashes Kirov, just because it's a cool-sounding name, despite him being a commie politician from a state that no longer exists.
My only criticism for Jackill would be that he seems to put an arboretum into every single ship. Seems to me that it's not something that every ship would have room for or need for.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.