Notice in TOS the klingons look human like, yet in the movies they do not? Can anyone explain why? I prefer the TOS Klingons anyway to that of the movies and other Star Trek series.
I also prefer the TOS Klingons, since their society became a stereotype later in Star Trek.
The official explaination is they contracted a genetic virus making them look like the TOS era Klingons, the unofficial one is that they wanted to make the Klingons look more alien and high budget for the movies.
Then throw Enterprise into the mix and try working it out.![]()
Third time's the charm?Enterprise had a two parter which went into this by stating that the turtle headed Klingons were the originals and they were affected by a augmented human virus from some of the eugenic supermen from Kahn's time! This lost them their head ridges and made them more violent and aggressive! The reason for them returning to their 'original' state in TMP and after has not been explained!
JB
Notice in TOS the klingons look human like, yet in the movies they do not? Can anyone explain why? I prefer the TOS Klingons anyway to that of the movies and other Star Trek series.
I had a brief obsession with the Klingons a few decades ago and that was my take. I drew map of the Klingon Homeworld and every makeup variation was assigned a region of origin. Back then there weren't that many. I think STIV was the most recent film and TNG had just started.I've always preferred the simple view: just as there are different races of humans there could be different races of Klingons. I imagined the TOS might not be quite a human looking as we saw them while still not as elaborate as the TMP/TNG style Klingons.
Imagine if Neanderthals had survived as a race alongside contemporary humans.
I've always preferred the simple view: just as there are different races of humans there could be different races of Klingons. I imagined the TOS might not be quite a human looking as we saw them while still not as elaborate as the TMP/TNG style Klingons.
Imagine if Neanderthals had survived as a race alongside contemporary humans.
Yeah, that was a truly stupid thing to do. They should have left things well enough alone or dialed it back. DS9 followed the TMP idea that the Klingons always looked along the lines of the TMP/TNG style only TOS couldn't afford to show that. But then revisting the TOS era created a problem because now you had the DS9 crew interacting with the TOS crew and the drastic difference between Worf and the TOS era Klingons. Also no one comments on why Koloth looks one way in TOS after how we had seen him appear in DS9.The idea that Klingons were of different species was a clever one, especially when you remember that Kras and koloth's crew were lighter skinned Klingons than Kor, Krell and Kang's boys! But that all folded when Kor, Kang and Koloth turned up on DS9 in 94, and all three had turtle heads and straggly hair without any explanation!
JB
I always took issue with that. I preferred the John M. Ford view that Klingons actually had a shorter lifespan than humans partly due to a higher metabolic rate and more highly aggressive natures.By including Kang, Kor and Koloth, "Blood Oath" also introduced, out of the blue, the notion that Klingons have centuries-long lifespans.
Kor
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.