What about Jake Sisko?
Spoilers STAR TREK BEYOND
- Thread starter Khan 2.0
- Start date
What about Jake Sisko?
Lots of potential reviewers don't know about the embargo change yet:
HeyUGuys Movie News @HeyUGuys 2h2 hours ago
So while our review of Star Trek Beyond is embargoed, we can confirm that it's a truly wondrous, purely fun slice of contemporary sci-fi.
HeyUGuys Movie News @HeyUGuys 2h2 hours ago
So while our review of Star Trek Beyond is embargoed, we can confirm that it's a truly wondrous, purely fun slice of contemporary sci-fi.
Didn't Wesley and Icheb do something like this?
this sounds like a mixed review but by the end it sounded positive.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/star-trek-beyond-half-a-good-star-trek-movie-is-better-1783712148
http://io9.gizmodo.com/star-trek-beyond-half-a-good-star-trek-movie-is-better-1783712148
401 / Can't access post 1783712148: You need to be a member of the blog
yes they did which just supports my point that it would be very easy to explain her presence on the Enterprise in the next movie if the writers wanted to include her. There is no need for the next movie to skip 4-5 years so that Jaylah can graduate from Starfleet.
Damn, that review is pretty disheartening.
I think writing off any bad review as "just another JJ hater!", is ignorant and unfair. I'm going to wait to see the film myself and I'm still excited, but his complaints are perfectly feasible. I'm just hoping he's wrong, because after all the fun action set pieces and witty one-liners, there needs to be a story that stands up to rewatches and layers that can be stripped off with each viewing. I like some of the Fast & Furious films because they're well-made all-out action and lots of fun, but I wouldn't watch them more than once or twice. Star Trek is a very different franchise when it comes to that for me at least.
Most of the reviews are very positive though, which is the strangest thing. I guess we'll find out more later today.
As I pointed out in the Collider thread, 100% of the reviews will not be positive. Why are you putting so much emphasis on this one when it's vastly outnumbered so far?
The reviewer was a very young girl. I find it interesting that women reviewers tend to bring up completely different points than many male reviewers. Just an observation.
I've rewatched STID 14 times so far. I find it extremely rewatchable.
As usual of course, reviews have no affect on my decision to see a movie. I just find them to be one facet of the overall reaction to a movie.
RAMA
The reviewer was a very young girl. I find it interesting that women reviewers tend to bring up completely different points than many male reviewers. Just an observation.
I've rewatched STID 14 times so far. I find it extremely rewatchable.
As usual of course, reviews have no affect on my decision to see a movie. I just find them to be one facet of the overall reaction to a movie.
RAMA
That's a grown man, not a young girl
Like I said, it's only somewhat disheartening. The reason I'm putting more emphasis on that review is because it's the only one that's gone in-depth, every other review has been a tweet raving about how great it is but they don't explain why. This is the only review out where the reviewer has talked about why they didn't like it. Like I said, we won't know anything really until tonight when official reviews are out, but for now, this is the only one we have.
It's nice that you find STID very rewatchable though, I'm not a big fan of that film myself, but to each his own.
Cool clip. Feels very TOS to me.
I made a decision after my experience with STID to have my own review embargo. Reading the reviews left me so disheartened that I didn't see the film for two weeks after release, which I immediately regretted.
I don't trust reviewers any more, and, if a film appeals to me, then I'll go see it. Pure and simple.
I don't trust reviewers any more, and, if a film appeals to me, then I'll go see it. Pure and simple.
Not to mention T'pol.
I've no particular affection for Rand, but as demonstrated by Uhura and Chekov, the TOS characters can be reinvented and updated for modern times.
If this was REAL Star Trek, this scene would be at least 30 seconds longer. #NotMyTrek
I'm not sure if this is a funny post or a serious one! If serious, would those extra 30 seconds consist of a briefing room segment to discuss what they should do while the ship is being ripped to shreds?
Also, this is a Paramount made movie, so it IS real Star Trek. Get over it!
Similar threads
