YOU'RE HERE!!!! I'm so happy to see your avatar again!!!So does the "no alcohol" rule also apply to synthehol? Asking for a Ferengi friend...
YOU'RE HERE!!!! I'm so happy to see your avatar again!!!So does the "no alcohol" rule also apply to synthehol? Asking for a Ferengi friend...
![]()
He literally just gave me a fucking medal. I don't even know anymore.
I know, he's loving this little argument.
Yes he was pushing for a set of guidelines, and yes he did say 'something like Star Wars'!Gerrold.........He was ASKING FOR THE RULES. He even said, SOMETHING LIKE STAR WARS.
OMG. OMFG. OFMOG!why I suspect he hates the rules, no one who as worked on Official Star Trek can do a fan film. Which is all he does now.
His dog in the fight must've eaten the post.
The interesting thing is: Alec peters and Axanar were touting the fact that Disney had rules for Star Wars Fan Films; and urging CBS and Paramount to adopt similar rules. The interesting thing to note is that as strict as these new Star Trek Fan Film Guidelines are, they are actually LESS draconian the Disney 'Star Wars' fan film guidelines.While these rules seem slightly over the top, you can't blame Paramount and CBS for it.
GOOD JOB ALEX! Way to ruin it for everyone.
^^^CBS and Paramount Pictures are big believers in reasonable fan fiction and fan creativity, and, in particular, want amateur fan filmmakers to showcase their passion for Star Trek. Therefore, CBS and Paramount Pictures will not object to, or take legal action against, Star Trek fan productions that are non-professional and amateur and meet the following guidelines.
I think the real target of these "guidelines" are the crowdfunding platforms that allowed fan-film groups to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars in the first place. It would not surprise me if these are not eventually adopted by other studios with respect to their own IP. And if I'm Indiegogo or Kickstarter, there's no way I'm allowing any fan film to raise money through my site unless they comply with these rules (and maybe even if they do).The situation remains that CBS and or Paramount are free to selectively go after anyone who doesn't obtain an IP License from them to produce something Star Trek related; but does decide to produce something Star Trek related.
^^^^They aren't going to be admitted as evidence; I don't see them as being proof of anything. Essentially, per the law, they would be hearsay and it's hearsay that likely does not fit under any exception.
Plus I am quite sure these aren't/cannot effectively be retroactive. This is (I am quite sure) the rule going forward.
The interesting thing is: Alec peters and Axanar were touting the fact that Disney had rules for Star Wars Fan Films; and urging CBS and Paramount to adopt similar rules. The interesting thing to note is that as strict as these new Star Trek Fan Film Guidelines are, they are actually LESS draconian the Disney 'Star Wars' fan film guidelines.
Also, the opening statement at:
http://www.startrek.com/fan-films
^^^
Doesn't explicitly state that they WILL ALWAYS take action if the above is violated - just that they MAY raise an objection or MAY take legal action.
IMO - It probably means that the Star Trek Continues group as well as the Renagades might be allowed to continue and complete what they already announced they'll be doing; but any group starting up a new Fan Film project going forward now, runs a grater risk if the Guidelines are not followed. But again, that's conjecture on my part.
The situation remains that CBS and or Paramount are free to selectively go after anyone who doesn't obtain an IP License from them to produce something Star Trek related; but does decide to produce something Star Trek related.
As for Axanar in particular - "It's dead Jim." - 100%. CBS and Paramount have already raised the ultimate objection to Axanar by filing and pursuing the lawsuit; and further since Axanar Productions and Alec Peters have claimed IN COURT FILINGS that:
"No finalized/locked Axanar script exists."
I'm pretty sure ANY settlement with regard to the continuation of Axanar production will include a provision to the effect of: "Yes, you can, but ONLY if you completely follow the new Star Trek Fan Film guidelines that CBS and Paramount have set forth."
Hilariously (but sadly for many Star Trek fan film fans and groups), in the end, with regard to Star Trek Fan Film Guidelines, Alec Peters, Robert Meyer Burnett and hell, David Gerrold got EXACTLY what they were asking for from CBS and Paramount in their Tweets/Facebook Posts/Blogs. <--- So again, the old saying applies: "Be careful what you wish for.."
I don't know. I'm in waiting mode on this. I suspect that between the defendant & Mr. Bawden (& possibly Ms. Ranahan too) there is possibly enough talent there to put just such a spin on it. Very talented in this area, them. And all three of them can be quoted multiple times for their want and 'the' need for guidelines. With Star Wars being held as example multiple times.There's no way Alec and Axanar get to spin this positively.
Believe me, I've already seen it from some friends. It's not Alec's fault, nuh uh, nope, and if you believe it is you're a corporate shill.I don't know. I'm in waiting mode on this. I suspect that between the defendant & Mr. Bawden (& possibly Ms. Ranahan too) there is a possibility enough talent there to put just such a spin on it. Very talented in this area, them. And all three of them can be quoted multiple times for their want and 'the' need for guidelines. With Star Wars being held as example multiple times.
However, now that these guideline have arrived - in a much more generous set than SW is boxed into - these new guidelines directly addresses multiple things the production and defendant in this litigation have used for their cornerstone....... sooooo
I see the possibility of a heavy 'victim' spin too.
And I have no doubt that however it is spun, either or both will fly and be embraced without hesitation by the Followers of this production and producer.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.