To be fair, it's a nice clip of VFX. I forget the name of the guy who did it (that's showbiz, I guess) but I think it looks nice enough.
I think his name is JOHN DOE.
To be fair, it's a nice clip of VFX. I forget the name of the guy who did it (that's showbiz, I guess) but I think it looks nice enough.
Exactly - which is why I wondered why the waves were breaking upon it. Waves usually break upon the shore, sometimes against cliffs. They are not usually known for breaking against the shell of the sky (AKA firmament)Who wrote this? Google "waves firmament". Remember the firmament was above the flat Earth.
Pro-Axanar blog claims CBS/Paramount's answer to counterclaim gives Axanar's legal team an unintended gift. See what you think…
The author asserts that because there is a hobbyists' comprehensive record of other fan films not being shut down, that somehow this creates some space for defeating CBS/P on the grounds that they are somehow unfairly singling out Axanar. As I understand it, the enforcement history might address the damages but has 0% bearing on whether the lawsuit can be pressed and won. And CBS/P based damages on the making of benefits, not necessarily the unquantifiable impact of a fan film on ticket sales or the like.
The author also asserts that the 'gift' is that CBS/P admitted to 4 contacts between them and Alec, and so they will be in some sort of weak position where it was reasonable for Alec to assume he could proceed, and it would only be a 'he said/she said' situation (somehow less effective as a case), unless the studios can prove they had written followup to Alec of any instructions not to proceed.
Firstly, it is just the author's speculation that there is no written followup.
Secondly, the studios could potentially demonstrate by their own recollection/records of the meetings what happened, I wouldn't think these things would be without weight. In fact, they could be pretty damning, and meanwhile the whole defense team has to rely on Alec's representation of what actually happened, until CBS/P presents its records to discovery or at trial... *that* sounds like a nice smooth road.
Thirdly, Alec said things here and there in podcasts and the like, and his emails may be discoverable, all of which could show him at some point having told someone that they were in some sense as he understood it, not just left in the dark, but told no or told in respect to a direct request, "we can't agree to that" (which is no, not "unanswered").
In fact, I thought that's what the recent Trekzone podcast unearthed wrt/ the permission to write novellas, wasn't Alec said to have said "we asked and we couldn't get that permission?". I know that's hearsay, but I wonder how emails might weigh in.
Finally, the "innocently proceeding forward without knowledge of wrongdoing" part has to be weighed, I think, in the context of blatant repeated attempts at unlicensed appropriation of Trek IP for resale on the side. It reflects back on how "innocent" the making of the film should be considered to be.
As for the "fair use" assertion which seems to be the main defense W&S talks about, this author seems to think 'fair use' means give Axanar the same treatment as others. I guess it probably doesn't mean that at all. And the author seems to think that all the profiteering angles are no different than other films and so should be discounted. That seems like a stretch.
The blogger says he's married to a lawyer but she refuses to discuss Axanar with him.Burden of proof in a counterclaim is on the party asserting it.
Defense asserts the counterclaim and they are asserting permission or at least, I suppose, benign neglect. CBS and Paramount don't have to prove anything when it comes to the counterclaim and, yes, the affirmative defense of fair use. It's all on the defense.
The blogger says he's married to a lawyer but she refuses to discuss Axanar with him.
I'm not a bit surprised.![]()
Exactly - which is why I wondered why the waves were breaking upon it. Waves usually break upon the shore, sometimes against cliffs. They are not usually known for breaking against the shell of the sky (AKA firmament)
My musing was really about who wrote the who narration passage (probably AP) since whoever it was probably just picked "firmament" as a fancy sounding word.
The narration struck me as being "writerly." It wasn't a character speaking naturally. It was how a writer imagined literary or elevated speech should sound, except actual literary or elevated speech doesn't sound like that at all. You see it a lot with novice writers.
My musing was really about who wrote the who narration passage (probably AP) since whoever it was probably just picked "firmament" as a fancy sounding word.
Just caught the new 'trailer' for Axanar.
At this point I'm guessing Alec WANTS to be sued into bankruptcy...
Alec wants to be sued six ways to Sunday ?
Well, that can be arranged, let's get DISNEY in on this...
;-)
The Mouse would of handed him his own rear back to him months ago, w/ interest no less.
Namely he would of had to pay Dis to get his own rear back in one piece.
I would not be surprised if all of the big studios in Hollywood are watching this, or are part of this.
IP law is so new, ink is still drying on the paperwork, hell IP law might get a rewrite BECAUSE of this mess.
If AP wants to go down as the one who challenged IP law & lost the shirt on his back, well, that's his own damn fault.
There are some excellent fan films involving Star Wars out there. Mostly they tell other stories, not recreating the principle characters or sets- no one was cast as Han or Luke.The Mouse probably *is* in on it. I would not be surprised if there hasn't been a summit at some resort. Letting arbitrarily high quality productions copy/dilute IP, distribute, divert IP revenue to seeding and operating their continuing business, and letting them tap the fan wallets and resale aftermarket with impunity because they can call themselves "fan films" just cannot be a pure CBS/P matter.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.