Condemning the entire project?!? where do you see that?. Condemning the entire project without at least attempting find out why the discrepancy exists is just useless nitpicking.
Condemning the entire project?!? where do you see that?. Condemning the entire project without at least attempting find out why the discrepancy exists is just useless nitpicking.
^^^And I'm all for discussion of the qualities and merits of the films. Sure, critique the acting, the visuals, especially the stories. That's all quite interesting and very worthwhile. What I don't think is though, is the endless nitpicking that if it's not a complete, static copy of the show or isn't how some view a mythical 1970 season in their heads, it's either not Star Trek, or it's a betrayal of Star Trek, two opinions I've seen voiced in this thread more then once.
Great point about McKennah.. I thought that her recovery had to do with her being a shrink and she was more aware of mental processes, but she definitely lost control outside of Usdi's influence when she started hammering on people.
Did anyone notice the restyled phasers pistols they were using instead of the original design? You mign't notice the difference unless you look closely.
And exactly who has condemned the entire project for these discrepencies?Fine. Calling them out on a discrepancy between stated intent and actual deed is fair. Condemning the entire project without at least attempting find out why the discrepancy exists is just useless nitpicking.
And exactly who has condemned the entire project for these discrepencies?
No one.
Then he's not faithfully interpreting the original Star Trek series, and another reason why "Starship Exeter" gets the gold star in fanfilms. There's no need to make a fan series claiming it's being accurate but is failing on the writing process by not embracing what was done. Too many times these fan-projects, even Hollywood themselves, feel the need to correct what never had to be corrected. It's make believe, there's no need to sh*t on what was done just to make their accomplishments appear better.
There's not much to be disappointed about STC because there's nothing there to begin with. Starting from the 1st 2 episodes they failed their mission statement, and then drifted with a redundant Mirror episode, and then made 2 remaining eps which were lost in translation narratives.
Starship Exeter nailed the tone and feel of Star Trek, if they decided to come back? There would be an expectation where they couldn't possibly fulfill because by their second episode it was done right. I can't speak the same way for STC because the production, including the performances, draws attention to itself... all the time, and I've decided to look at that production for what it is.
STC is a glorified pastiche of fanwankery.
Again, there's nothing wrong with a bunch of fans making a glitzy production, but when the lead person promotes the project as something which it's truly not is when I feel it falls into parody. Like a lot of artists; they can't seem to be critical of their own work. Or the promotions are just a silly ploy to raise money. Again, nothing wrong with that but it's not and will never be considered an extension or a proper continuation to Star Trek.
Certainly no one throughout the entire discussion in this thread or other discussions on this board regarding STC.
No one.
See above for just a quick sample.
This board exist to express and exchange opinions. Not all opinions expressed will be positive and popular. If all one wants to see is glowing praise then it would be best to seek out forums where that is all you will see.
Condescension might be your default position, but you're in polite company so cut it out.
And enough with the telling people where to post. Everyone here is posting exactly what and where they want to, your helpful directions notwithstanding.
^^ They were blunt, but I don't take what they said as outright condemnation.
You, on the other hand, I've had enough of. You evidently need to have things sugar coated and gentile or else you get upset. You are going to see blunt and to-the-point opinions around here. If that upsets you then it is your issue and not those expressing their view in their own way.
In the interests of remaining civil on this board I'll refrain from expressing the words you richly deserve. Particularly since you enjoy making so many assumptions about someone you know nothing about.Awww...am I hurting you, Lambchop?
Like most with obnoxious behavior you have a mighty thin skin. Yup, mighty thin.
As for what goes on around here, heh, I've been here since Christian owned the board. Now while that's worth as much as your post count, it does mean I've seen more then few of your type scuttling across the board looking for threads to bellow your nerd rage into over the past 17-18 years.
I'll be sure to be on the lookout for your next hot pocket fueled burst of outrage, just for the laugh you understand, but I might not reply. Don't take it personally though.![]()
Yep. What was the other term he used? Cosmotoa or something?"Nomadic Extremophile" - I think Mr. Spock and Fox Mulder would get along pretty well.
Cosmozoa.Yep. What was the other term he used? Cosmotoa or something?
Yes, I thought it was very nicely done. I liked a lot of the episode, the pacing was good, the principle photography was just beautiful with pop and great saturation. Most of the actors seem to be improving in their characterizations. The alien was a nice little throwback to The Savage Curtain. I felt that the story could have been tighter, and the Gigi Edgely character could have been a bit less emotional though she was good.Music. I thought the music was good, and accurately supported the tone of this fanfilm. It hit the beats and tempo, any thoughts?
Although it's never explained in the episodes I'm assuming Chapel has transferred offship and went to complete becoming a full-fledged doctor. Of course, couldn't she have been studying while aboard ship as well?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.