misread "removing" instead of "replacing", was amused
Back in the day, I regularly watched Fat Albert.
I guess the way I look at it is this:
What we enjoy that has someone playing a role is almost like a different universe. We don't have to mix that together with whatever they do in the prime universe of real life. If we choose, we can look at it as two different people. Or even a split, like Kirk in 'The Enemy Within'.
As for the smoking thing, I'm conflicted. On the one hand, I dislike seeing people smoke; I find it kind of disgusting. But it's actually kind of interesting sociologically to watch old shows and movies where people smoked constantly and it was so integrated into the culture in some ways, like how a woman could invite a conversation by holding an unlit cigarette and waiting for a man to come and light it for her. Or how a character could pass another character a message written inside a matchbook.
The lessons that Cosby taught in that show are still valid. The fact that he was hypocritical with his own behavior does nothing to undo the lesson.As a rule, I can accept that. But as I explained, the Cosby/Fat Albert matter is different for me. There, he wasn't just participating as an actor, but specifically as an educator. He was speaking directly to us, as Bill Cosby, and presenting himself as a guide on ethical behavior and respect for other people. He was narrating supposedly autobiographical stories based on his own childhood and framing them as his own hard-earned life lessons. So I grew up respecting Cosby for his values and moral example, not just for his talent as a performer playing unrelated characters. So that makes it a rather different situation than, say, watching a Victoria Vetri movie or a Woody Allen movie. They never claimed to be role models.
As a rule, I can accept that. But as I explained, the Cosby/Fat Albert matter is different for me. There, he wasn't just participating as an actor, but specifically as an educator. He was speaking directly to us, as Bill Cosby, and presenting himself as a guide on ethical behavior and respect for other people. He was narrating supposedly autobiographical stories based on his own childhood and framing them as his own hard-earned life lessons. So I grew up respecting Cosby for his values and moral example, not just for his talent as a performer playing unrelated characters. So that makes it a rather different situation than, say, watching a Victoria Vetri movie or a Woody Allen movie. They never claimed to be role models.
...
As for TMP . . . bottom line: the character in the movie isn't Stephen Collins, it's "Will Decker."
Spock said that, not Kirk.It's tough, I know. Even though I haven't watched Fat Albert in almost 40 years, I can still remember the expression on his face when there was unfairness/injustice.
In some cases, I look at it like the scene in 'I, Mudd' where Kirk says "I love you. But I hate you." Taking two sides of the same person and seeing it in different ways. Putting a comic spin on something that is otherwise deeply troubling.
Humor is salve for the heart and soul.
Spock said that, not Kirk.
Kor
With that in mind, some have suggested to completely replace Stephen Collins in TMP just as soon as it is possible to do so.
Forget CGI, if this was the direction you wanted to go, then recording a new actor in costume against a blue/green screen and edit them over Collins. That tech is here (or will be soon).
I'd rather have Walter Koenig erased from every Star Trek production and replaced with someone who can act![]()
Stephen Collins as Decker is fine. However, I would like Grace Lee Whitney edited into seasons 2 and 3 of TOS please.There is the suggestion that at some point in the future, CGI and audio capabilities will reach a level at which artificial will be very difficult to be distinguished from real. New movies featuring the images and voices of stars long since deceased, etc.
With that in mind, some have suggested to completely replace Stephen Collins in TMP just as soon as it is possible to do so.
Should things be left alone and off-screen lives be completely ignored no matter the content?
Two versions of TMP for people to choose from?
Opinions / ideas ?
And just who are these people that are suggesting this? People who have nothing better to do with their time than sit in front of their computers and come up with asinine ideas that will go nowhere?
They will never spend the money to do this, now should they, they will start pretending in a few years that the older movies don't even exist.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.