Sigh. Note that this article is just citing the original article. It's not confirming anything.
This is how these "rumors" snowball . . ..
If true, then that's really disappointing. I don't have a problem with the Klingons, but I don't want them to be the villains.I could not get second sourced at this time, so consider this a wild rumor: while the Khitomer Conference will have paved the way for Klingons and humans to find peace, Fuller has a plan as to how he can still feature villainous Klingons, something we haven't seen in decades!
I think the constraints set by the timeframe might be a good thing. It limits creating silly new technology and seven different races of superaliens. Sometimes limited palette is good, especially if you have talented artists, and I think they have a pretty solid team.
@Greg Cox No, that was Jordan Hoffman. Faraci just wrote an article about it.
Yes, I can't believe I forgot that one! It's actually a particularly appropriate example since the seasons all take place in the same fictional universe and even feature some of the same characters in different time periods.Not to mention Fargo, one of the best shows on TV today.
If the Klingons are a major player, it reeks of a lack of creativity. Out of seven hundred episodes, roughly 500of them have featured Klingons in some form.
Honestly, I tired of them a long time ago.
I'm not sure why people think that because it's set during a certain period of time relative to the original universe (or whatever people insist on calling it) that it's actually set in the original universe.
I love Klingons! Never enough Klingons!
I just read about the rumor in this article: http://www.treknews.net/2016/04/13/new-star-trek-series-before-tng-prime-universe/
If it is true, it would be good to fill up some of the gaps between 2293 and 2364.
Thanks for clearly identifying this as a "Rumor" in the thread title. Drives me crazy when rumors and speculation get reported as "news."
I love ironic posts, so I'm going to like this one but not for any reason you'd probably enjoy.He can be confident in it all he wants. That doesn't make it true.
I suggested the same in the articles comments (their title is BREAKING, no mention of rumor except in the article) and just got downvoted :/
Careful. You're debating within the confines and suppositions of the rumor you reject. Wasted time?I really don't need for them to be constrained. I want them to be creative with the premise and not locked in by minutiae. Though I hope if they want to create a wild new technology or superbeing, they won't let canon stand in the way.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.