• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Has a continuity error ever been corrected by, or inspired Trek Lit?

Peter David loves correcting his own and canonical glitches in later installments of "New Frontier". At one point, he has male and female captain siblings of a starship (ie. handing it over) to satisfy a gender specification in the aired canon. Also reference to a canonical use of a "different Shelby".

"The Road to Edos" by Kevin Dilmore explains how Arex the Triexian is often mistaken for an Edoan/Edosian.
 
But the thing with "Balance of Terror" wasn't even that Romulans specifically didn't have cloaking devices, it's that cloaking devices were an amazing new technology in TOS' world. ENT had already given the Suliban and Xyrillians cloaking technology, and gone as far as to leave the Enterprise with a Suliban pod on board, which they used (cloaked!) in a rescue mission. Plus, there was an entire cloaked Romulan minefield in "Minefield" which worked just fine.

That just my opinion though. If it worked for you, that's great. I'd have preferred they just let the initial retcon (that cloaking devices were a thing in 2151, Spock and Kirk's convo in "Balance of Terror" is ignored) be and build on the ENT world as intended.
Always sounded to me like the idea was known and even tried.
SPOCK: Invisibility is theoretically possible, Captain, with selective bending of light. But the power cost is enormous. They may have solved that problem.
 
Let's not forget all the other cloaking inconsistencies. Cloaks could be detected by motion sensors in "Balance of Terror" but not later in "The Enterprise Incident." Klingon cloaks had visible distortion in ST III but not in ST VI. Spock found a way to pierce cloaks in ST VI, but it was not used in the TNG era. The Mirror Universe Klingons had cloaks in "Crossover" but none in "The Emperor's New Cloak."

The only logical explanation is that there's a constant race between stealth and detection, and that every time a given cloaking tech is penetrated, it's rendered useless and abandoned until a new form of cloak is later invented. Not only does that resolve all the seeming contradictions, but it just stands to reason that it would happen that way.
 
Let's not forget all the other cloaking inconsistencies. Cloaks could be detected by motion sensors in "Balance of Terror" but not later in "The Enterprise Incident."
That's not an inconsistency, that's a plot point: "I believe the Romulans have developed a cloaking device which renders our tracking sensors useless."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
^Still, it helps support the overall idea that cloaking technology is a succession of progressively improving systems rather than a single unchanging technology.
 
DTI - Watching the Clock justified why canonically the Devidians never showed up again and/or were not considered some major threat to look out for.

STO on the other hand (and for that matter also one DC comic) took the Devidians in a completely different direction.
 
Last edited:
I'm still unsure about the name of Will Riker's mother. Annie? Betty?

And B'Elanna's mother used to be called Prabsa, before they changed it into Miral during the show and stuck with that.
 
Probably every franchise that's gotten beyond one or two installments (books, short stories, movies, TV series episodes) is going to have continuity problems. Star Trek is perhaps notable for being relatively free from them (at least considering the hundreds of episodes and novels involved), and for coming up with explanations to successfully retcon them away when they do happen.

Consider other franchises. Like the Humanx Commonwealth. To date, Alan Dean Foster has been the sole author in that franchise, and yet in one book, we have the insectoid Thranx taking up body-surfing, and even teaming up with a Human friend and serving as a living surfboard, and yet in a later book, ADF establishes that the Thranx, with their relatively vulnerable breathing spicules, are racially terrified of immersion in water.

Or Oz: yes, that's been a multi-author franchise since Baum died in 1919, but even during his lifetime, there were continuity glitches, with perhaps the biggest one being that in The Marvelous Land of Oz, Oz (i.e., the humbug Wizard, Oscar Zoroaster Phadrig Isaac Norman Henkle Emmannuel Ambroise Diggs) is established as having been at least tacitly complicit, and possibly one of the conspirators, in the captivity of Ozma, the rightful ruler, and yet when he returns, permanently, in Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz, he's completely forgiven, and the whole matter of his complicity in Ozma's captivity is quietly dropped. (Decades later, in the short story, "Oz and the Three Witches," Hugh Pendexter III managed to retcon away that glitch, and I think he did so quite successfully).

And personally, regarding the SW "parsec question," I'm with the EU authors on this one, assuming that the trick of the Kessel Run is to avoid the obstacle(s) in the shortest possible distance traveled.
 
Probably every franchise that's gotten beyond one or two installments (books, short stories, movies, TV series episodes) is going to have continuity problems.

Sometimes even two installments will do it. Like when, in my second Hub story for Analog, I got the name of an alien species wrong, even though it was my own creation. I got it mixed up with a species name I'd used in passing in a Trek story. (I fixed it in the collection, though.)
 
Sometimes even two installments will do it. Like when, in my second Hub story for Analog, I got the name of an alien species wrong, even though it was my own creation. I got it mixed up with a species name I'd used in passing in a Trek story. (I fixed it in the collection, though.)

On a similar note, I remember Asimov once mentioning in one of his anthologies that when he was picking the Foundation series back up after its hiatus, he had to reread all its previous installments because he couldn't remember a thing about what happened in them.
 
And I didn't mean it as defensiveness -- I was just pointing out that even re-reading isn't a guarantee against error. Heck, I recently figured out that when I collected the Hub stories and added a bit of new material to them, I inadvertently introduced another continuity mistake -- and one involving the same character whose species name I got wrong before. In this case, I forgot what job I'd originally assigned him and put in a line implying it was more narrowly focused than I'd originally intended. Fortunately it's ambiguously enough phrased that it can be papered over in the next story.

But that's how tricky continuity can be. You can even create continuity problems by trying to fix continuity problems.
 
Peter David loves correcting his own and canonical glitches in later installments of "New Frontier". At one point, he has male and female captain siblings of a starship (ie. handing it over) to satisfy a gender specification in the aired canon.

That was the two Taggerts on the Repulse, wasn't it? I think PAD actually might have described them as father and daughter, though, IIRC.
 
Warpath had two errors that were corrected later -

Ensign Merimark already had her first name given as Kaitlin but was given as Stefka in Warpath - this was explained as something only Vaughn called her. The other was Etana being a nurse in Warpath when previously she was on Odo's security team.
 
Warpath had two errors that were corrected later -

Ensign Merimark already had her first name given as Kaitlin but was given as Stefka in Warpath - this was explained as something only Vaughn called her. The other was Etana being a nurse in Warpath when previously she was on Odo's security team.

Didn't Etana cross-train?
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top