Guys, let's not speculate about Dianna. The picture that Tom saw could means anything. I just saw it. Looks like a selfie between friends. She's basically a fan-film maker much like Alec Peters is with his Star Trek fan-film until the lawsuit. 

Depends. I'm taking a case to the (English) Court of Appeal at the moment pro bono. I think that while it has merit it's going to be very difficult to win due to the current approach of the courts on the issues it involves. I'm doing it mainly to give my client a fighting chance and get my firm's name in the law reports, and that's always beneficial for getting new work.Well, I imagine they wouldn't have taken this case pro bono if they didn't feel they could win, AND felt that they could burnish the firm's image in the process.
I still think they are delusional, but what do I know?
Depends how you look at it. If they choose to stay in spite of the litigation and Axanar is found to be infringing the IP, then the crew are helping to further that. That is surely their personal choice and not that of Peters?Who is to say. In any case, a few times in this thread I have called for much of crew to get out of Axanar, in fear they may incriminate themselves if they are listed as one of the 20 Does. Not sure if this is related to Dianna, but I would hope she (and others) remove themselves from this toxic situation. Alec is the captain of the ship, and he should be the only one that has to go down with it not any of the crew.
Depends how you look at it. If they choose to stay in spite of the litigation and Axanar is found to be infringing the IP, then the crew are helping to further that. That is surely their personal choice and not that of Peters?
Same, but I liked Star Trek 2009 because it was a fun action movie, I couldn't really see it as being Star Trek.I liked it too, to be honest, it was fun to watch, but I liked the 09 reboot too ( but not into darkness)
Same, but I liked Star Trek 2009 because it was a fun action movie, I couldn't reater it lly see it as being Star Trek.
Was just on FB, looks like Alec has a new girlfriend, wonder what happened with Dianna? He likes blondes, that's for sure. (not that there is anything wrong with that)
Screen cap and where, please?
Personally, I'd be surprised if it did. The copyright for all of Trek is jointly own by the two studios. I think even a layman can see that the likelihood is that the IP will be found to be theirs.Re the lawsuit, I wonder whether the argument that the studio prove their copyright ownership in detail will survive. Clearly it is a straw bale in the jet engine tactic, and down the road allows the defense to undermine the case by attacking the trail of ownership itself if ownership is allowed to be examined and questioned. It seems to me every copyright defendant would try the same tactic if they could. There must be precedent to keep this manageable.
Chuckle. "Control the narrative." I imagine that the 500 people who actually care about this whole thing aren't going to be swayed by press releases, and if AP and Co. is hoping for a jury trial, they are truly delusional.
A question comes to mind based on what was mentioned in that FOX report.
When their motion was filed on Monday, was anyone from their defense team actually in a courtroom filing their motion, or is that done electronically, with a preliminary hearing date to be set?
Not speculating, FB says Alec Peters in now in a relationship with ______ (not posting her name on public forum). If you go to either of their pages it says there in a relationship with each other. Not a big deal, just curious if Dianna still is working for Axanar Productions if her and Alec broke up.
FYI ... Erin Ranahan, the lawyer representing Axanar, has talked to Fox News about the case, and said that Axanar has the best fans ...
Well, more or less.
http://1701news.com/node/1045/axanar-attorney-says-studios-have-targeted-biggest-fans.html
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.