• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Did Kylo Ren ... ? (spoilers)

WarpFactorZ

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
I've seen this theory floating around the net, and found it interesting (albeit predictable). Did Kylo Ren really kill Han Solo? He needed to do it to complete his journey to the Dark Side. But in his moment of indecision, he cries that he's not sure he has the strength to do it, and Han takes the lightsaber. There is little struggle before the saber ignites and impales Han. Kylo seems a bit startled afterward. Han caresses his cheek as he falls.

So, the working theory is that Han "shot first" -- that is, sacrificed himself -- so that Kylo/Ben didn't get to kill him. In this way, he can be redeemed in a future movie, and Han will stay true to his promise that he would bring their son home.

Thoughts!
 
My memory isn't really clear, but I don't remember there being any question in my mind that Kylo clearly killed him.
 
No.

Also: massive thread title spoilers.
First: the movie's been out for two months. The spoiler statute of limitations only goes so long.

Second: a mod was the first person to respond to the thread. If it was an infraction, it would have been noted.
 
Kylo killed Han, there is no question of it. And Han is not a Jedi, so he will not be a Force ghost.
 
First: the movie's been out for two months. The spoiler statute of limitations only goes so long.

Second: a mod was the first person to respond to the thread. If it was an infraction, it would have been noted.
It's still in theaters. As a courtesy, you could most certainly spoiler the title. I had yet to see the film, and was looking forward to it.
 
I'm not being rude or snarky, I'm just curious, why haven't you seen the movie yet?
I'm a 24/7/365 caregiver for a family member. I have to plan things months in advance, or I don't get to do them. The new Star Trek movie has been planned out since the release date was revealed last year. Even then, there's still a good chance I won't get to see it opening night, or even in the first week.

In the case of the Star Wars film, my plans fell through, so I had to try and reschedule. I was hoping to see it before it left theaters, but regardless I was still hoping to see it (probably on the DVD release date) before someone revealed a massive spoiler, because for me "Han Solo was killed..." doesn't matter by whom, it's the same as "Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker's father!"

I mean, Han's my favorite Star Wars character (aside from Darth Vader), so learning this just really sucks. I still plan on seeing the movie, but this really punches a hole in my enthusiasm.
 
It's still in theaters. As a courtesy, you could most certainly spoiler the title. I had yet to see the film, and was looking forward to it.
If you wanted to see the movie unspoiled you had more than enough time, you have only yourself to blame because it is unreasonable to expect to not run into spoilers about the most successful movie of the year after seven weeks.
Being spoiled becomes inevitable at some point, if it hadn't happened here you could have overheard people talking about it at the table next to yours in a restaurant for example, it happens.
 
Not to be That Guy, but...sure, what the hell, I'll be That Guy....

http://www.trekbbs.com/threads/spoiler-rules-are-updated-please-read-them.31005/

- First off, there should never be spoilers in thread titles. That's a no-no. Verboten.
- Second, if your thread contains or is likely to contain spoilers, please indicate that in the title, so folks looking to avoid spoilers can, well, avoid them.
- Fourthly, if you bring spoiler discussion into a regular thread, please use the spoiler code. Otherwise, Spiff cries, and every time Spiff cries, he gets really blubbery. We're talking newborn baby here. Dude makes Niagara Falls look like the desert, you get what we're saying? So you don't want to make Spiff cry.
- Finally, the statute of limitations on whether to consider an episode/film free of spoilers is one year from the time when it first airs, wherever it first airs. If a new episode of a series or film airs on June 1st in England then on Aug 1st in the US, the clock starts ticking on June 1st.
(Emphasis mine.)
 
If you wanted to see the movie unspoiled you had more than enough time, you have only yourself to blame because it is unreasonable to expect to not run into spoilers about the most successful movie of the year after seven weeks.
Being spoiled becomes inevitable at some point, if it hadn't happened here you could have overheard people talking about it at the table next to yours in a restaurant for example, it happens.
Two months. It's not like it's been a year, and the movie's on DVD/blu-ray, digital streaming, and everything else. Plus, spoilers aren't allowed in the title. So please, cut me some slack for not being that guy who can just drop everything to see a film right away, but who expects a modicum of self-control when posting spoilers where everyone can see them even though the film is still in theaters.
 
Two months. It's not like it's been a year, and the movie's on DVD/blu-ray, digital streaming, and everything else. Plus, spoilers aren't allowed in the title. So please, cut me some slack for not being that guy who can just drop everything to see a film right away, but who expects a modicum of self-control when posting spoilers where everyone can see them even though the film is still in theaters.

Well, I tried to edit the title to "Han Solo and Kylo Ren", but I can't figure out how to do it. But would that have prevented you from clicking on it? Or mousing over it, which brings up a window showing the post? There comes (as someone upthread mentioned) where YOU have to take responsibility for what spoils you and what doesn't.

I'm sorry for spoiling it for you, but quite honestly, I don't see why anyone is reading this board if they HAVEN'T seen the movie at this point. What are you hoping to gain? EVERY thread is full of spoilers. The movie's been out two months, running 24-7.
 
Well, I tried to edit the title to "Han Solo and Kylo Ren", but I can't figure out how to do it. But would that have prevented you from clicking on it? Or mousing over it, which brings up a window showing the post? There comes (as someone upthread mentioned) where YOU have to take responsibility for what spoils you and what doesn't.

I'm sorry for spoiling it for you, but quite honestly, I don't see why anyone is reading this board if they HAVEN'T seen the movie at this point. What are you hoping to gain? EVERY thread is full of spoilers. The movie's been out two months, running 24-7.
It was in the new posts sidebar. I wasn't even in the Star Wars forum.
 
Kylo was bullshitting Han the whole time. Kylo's full intent was to kill Han and he knew it all along. Anything he might have said to the contrary was just an example of Dark Side lies.

But I thought the point of the scene (established in lots of previous dialog) was that Kylo was still fighting "the light" within him. Face to face with his father, he became vulnerable. Han saw his chance to "grab" him (he was first going to take the saber), but saw it slip away as the sunlight faded and Ren's expression changed. That's when he did what he had to do as a final redemption.

I don't necessarily buy it, but I'm quite surprised that everyone is throwing it out as quickly as they are. Clearly Kylo Ren will follow the Vader path and will come back at the end. They're not going to rock the boat that much.
 
It was in the new posts sidebar. I wasn't even in the Star Wars forum.

But the thread title isn't really a spoiler. I could have posted "Does Kylo Ren Kill Chewbacca?", which is a valid question. It doesn't tell you whether one or the other happens. The only way you know is if you click on it... which, if you don't want to be spoiled, you don't.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top