• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Will it cost less than their extremely cheap shows Big Bang Theory, and 2 Broke Girls, Mike and Molly ect? For being the biggest comedy on TV Big Bang does very little that's not on their standing sets or with out side cast. Will it bring in more than thier hour long Dramas?

With $1,000,000 per episode for each of their three main cast members, an Episode of BBT costs as much as a Star Trek episode to produce....
 
I find it interesting how many folks seem to immediately see this as a black and white issue.

FWIW, the argument of "I created this concept so I should be able to control it completely" carries about as much weight with me in this context as a celebrity saying "I don't want to be photographed." If it offends you to see others create new things by modifying or building on your work, then keep it out of the public eye. That's my opinion on the topic in most areas of intellectual property, as unpopular as that may be.

Not true. The IP right has both the legal AND moral right to determine how their property is used. And according to the law, it is absolute. And if it is the law, how is it morally correct to use their property without their ok?

You also mention compromise. I believe the STAR TREK owners have compromised by letting fan films be made at all. Again they hold the legal rights to the company, and like it or not it is their sandbox.

It sounds as if you have a problem with the law as it stands. I can understand that.
Maybe it's unfair, but it is what it is, And that's what we have to work with.

What I don't hear being talked about is the fiduciary responsability that TPTB have to their stockholders. If they see Axanar as a threat (not just financially, but going ahead after being told publicly not to), they have the legal responsability to go after them.
 
You've ignored the far more interesting part of her update:

"Meanwhile, the Donor Store has been bustling, with many new and/or back-in-stock, super-popular items… which often wind up selling through within a couple days’ time! Be sure you check the store regularly, as well as the Facebook Donors Group (where store news is always posted, first), so you don’t miss out on something you’ve been wanting."

Neil

They have a "donor store"? Is the stuff on there separate from the donor perks?
 
^Don't know about that but I'll say this much... No way I'd spend $60 on a Blu-Ray of a 20 minute video. (Granted, it does seem to come with a few other things, BUT still!)
 
New Captain's Log at Axanar.
"we will have everything ready to roll cameras when the suit is settled."

Not that I think this is a surprise to anyone and perhaps "settled" is a poor choice of words on Peters' part.
I guess it could be, though my mere 'speculations' lead me (at this time anyway) to strongly believe this will settle out of court.

I 'speculate' the lawsuit was to establish an opening position for negotiations to begin. I speculate the equitable relief requests are also negotiation points.

I further 'speculate' Ranahan & Jick will get concessions, as will Loeb & Loeb. I have been examining enough (internet found) Copyright cases to make my eyes start crossing and finding enough similarities with this case and each other where Copyright and the courts are moving and bending, with words dilution of IP showing up here and there, with judgments denying as well as granting.

I speculate this case will be a sealed judgment, which will allow Defendants (as well as Plaintiffs if they so choose) to do at least a 'nudge nudge wink wink' inference of victory. I speculate the fan crowdfunded creation of the movie production company, store, and digital streaming service will remain pretty much as it now stands and stay in the hand of current holder.

Though I'm still not yet confident enough to even merely speculate about the continuance of the production as it stands. Nor any mere speculations about blowback for the beloved Trek fan production community at large.

However, as of yesterday my opinions about the players in this litigation are unexpectedly solidifying, with me now having clearer and growing stronger personal preferences for how this turns out.
 
Last edited:
They have a "donor store"? Is the stuff on there separate from the donor perks?
I think it's essentially the same (price points and merchandise) as the regular donor "perks", they just don't have to pay the KS/IGG middlemen.
 
I have been examining enough (internet found) Copyright cases similar enough to make my eyes start crossing and finding where Copyright and the courts are moving and bending, with words dilution of IP showing up here and there, conceding and granting.

Link to a relevant example?
 
I know that it's always been about $$$$ but it's also how they respect our feelings about the show
Whose feelings? Yours or mine? I'm perfectly happy with how CBS and Paramount are handling the franchise.

I do not advocate carte blanche appropriation. In point of fact, it's my opinion that, assuming you leave aside the various other surrounding shenanigans out of Camp Axanar (and there are so many!), ST:C and the like are actually much more egregious violators than Axanar, and on pure copyright grounds those are the ones I'm more likely to say should be stopped. They're a much more direct copy of "Star Trek".

Here what I think is happening in the legal offices...

They will allow you to compete with them by making non-Star Trek sci-fi, because they have to.
They will allow you to produce Star Trek that doesn't compete with current productions. TOS-wank doesn't compete with nuTrek, nor does an art school project with student actors. No one is going to confuse that fan-fiction with legitimate Trek.

What they WON'T allow is competing with them while making modern Trek. Tone, style, delivery, quality of production, actual characters played by their actual original actors - all that from Axanar is a direct competition to the movies and new series currently in production.
 
I speculate this case will be a sealed judgment, which will allow Defendants (as well as Plaintiffs if they so choose) to do at least a 'nudge nudge wink wink' inference of victory.

I wonder if Alec knows HOW to nudge nudge wink wink. :rommie:

Seriously, I'm speculating they don't settle. CBS has all the cards.

Re Winston and Strawn, they have already reaped a whirlwind of publicity referring to them as top IP attorneys. They don't need to win to profit from the decision to represent Axanar. When I worked at Skadden Arps, the IP cases were often defending losing cases. The worse your case, the better the attorney needed. There are lots of ways to spin BS with no actual legs to stand on. I once had a partner very happy that his argument fooled me into thinking they had a chance. (I was a proofreader and my degree is in art. I have no legal training.)
 
Last edited:
I don't think CBS really understands how to treat Trekkies. I know that it's always been about $$$$ but it's also how they respect our feelings about the show. These characters are more than just images on a screen (small and big) for us. For me it's more personal. The show has meant so much to me. It's expanded so far beyond through books and fan's creating their own shows. and of course FANZINES.

I would hope that CBS would wise up. I hope that I can see the new series without paying for their access service. I am still not happy the show is leaving Amazon

Our, us - why don't you stick to speaking for yourself - you don't speak for me as a trek fan (and I don't speak for you).
 
Link to a relevant example?
I know. And I do wish to provide such a link, but truly, honestly, and without hedging on your request I have been through so many now, so so many, that to go back through them again to find the one or a couple that exemplified what brought me to my current speculations would possibly not be as informative on how I arrived at my mere speculations as I would wish. Will you mind terribly if I just leave my post as an opinion piece?
 
Last edited:
I don't think CBS really understands how to treat Trekkies. I know that it's always been about $$$$ but it's also how they respect our feelings about the show. These characters are more than just images on a screen (small and big) for us. For me it's more personal. The show has meant so much to me. It's expanded so far beyond through books and fan's creating their own shows. and of course FANZINES.

I would hope that CBS would wise up. I hope that I can see the new series without paying for their access service. I am still not happy the show is leaving Amazon

CBS isn't a charity.
 
I don't think CBS really understands how to treat Trekkies. I know that it's always been about $$$$ but it's also how they respect our feelings about the show. These characters are more than just images on a screen (small and big) for us. For me it's more personal. The show has meant so much to me. It's expanded so far beyond through books and fan's creating their own shows. and of course FANZINES.

I would hope that CBS would wise up. I hope that I can see the new series without paying for their access service. I am still not happy the show is leaving Amazon
The Star Trek owners are a business and have no obligation to the fans. It IS a business, not a charity. They have a history of turning a blind eye to fan productions, but, if you've been following this thread, this is specifically about Axanar and how they've overstepped the bounderies.
Yes, the fans have kept the franchises alive, but Star Trek is not owned by us. Therefore, we don't set the rules. It's nice that they let many people play in their sandbox, but they truly don't have to.
I think that CBS/Paramount should be thanked for letting fan films go on as long as they have
 
It cost $1M/per episode when TNG was produced. Costs have gone up considerably since the '80's & 90's
You mis understand, Each of the three principles in BBT make 1 Million EACH, PER Episode, so your talking $3,000,000.00, and that doesn't count the other three leads, or the cost to Warner to actually MAKE the show.. (Production staff and whatnot.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top