• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
I haven't seen what comments Peters made exactly, but I do have how all of this might have played out if he had been more cooperative. Obviously CBS is fine with fan films in general, so it would seem to me that Peters himself is the cause of all of the drama, and if he had behaved differently this might not have ended up turning into such a fiasco. The fact that he keeps making posts about continuing production alone could be a bad idea. If somebody is threatening to shut you down, it could be seen as taunting them when you keep talking about how excited you are about the business.
 
I expected delay after delay, while other projects took priority, because, and the true believers would keep contributing, and nothing would ever get done except for more fundraisers and more salaries and more sushi.

That would be the Moller Skycar formula.

I think the difference is the actors. You can't keep actors on board indefinitely, and once the actors drop off, investors (er, donors) would be pissed off, as that was a big factor in them donating. Sure, Alec would remain as Garth, but nobody cares about that.
 
Even worse than those two (IMHO) is David Gerrold, who should know better, even if this is a benign comment. Here's what he had to say about this incident:

David Gerrold's statement about the Axanar lawsuit

Apologies if this has already been posted.

Beat ya to it a few posts ago. ;) See: http://www.trekbbs.com/showpost.php?p=11410977&postcount=1665

But I agree with you on Gerrold. He's become one of these Trek pundit's who makes his contribution to the franchise much more than it really is. And continues to speak as if he's the end all authority on STAR TREK.

Hey guys,

Working on a new blog now. I found the smoking gun.

w00t!
I used to respect Gerrold a lot more than I do now. Not as much these days; mainly cause of the attitude that you mentioned, I find a lot of his opinionated stuff short sighted or needlessly antagonistic.

I meet Gerrold a few years ago at WonderCon. He was nice enough and we had a long chat about his writing, journalism and other things. But he's trying to out Ellison Harlan Ellison nowadays.

And to be honest, his work has never resonated with me. I've read the STAR WOLF books and they're entertaining, but hardly memorable. I will say, however, Blood and Fire is the best of them. Too bad the NEW VOYAGES version wasn't as good.
 
You don't out-Ellison Harlan Ellison. I admire that man for attaining the levels of "blunt curmudgeon" he has reached. :lol:
 
Beat ya to it a few posts ago. ;) See: http://www.trekbbs.com/showpost.php?p=11410977&postcount=1665

But I agree with you on Gerrold. He's become one of these Trek pundit's who makes his contribution to the franchise much more than it really is. And continues to speak as if he's the end all authority on STAR TREK.



w00t!
I used to respect Gerrold a lot more than I do now. Not as much these days; mainly cause of the attitude that you mentioned, I find a lot of his opinionated stuff short sighted or needlessly antagonistic.

I meet Gerrold a few years ago at WonderCon. He was nice enough and we had a long chat about his writing, journalism and other things. But he's trying to out Ellison Harlan Ellison nowadays.

And to be honest, his work has never resonated with me. I've read the STAR WOLF books and they're entertaining, but hardly memorable. I will say, however, Blood and Fire is the best of them. Too bad the NEW VOYAGES version wasn't as good.

I also found the Star Wolf ultimately forgettable. And Blood and Fire, while a interesting concept, I think its production was hampered by ego. Gerrold wanted it made as a Trek script and by god he was going to get it made as a Trek script. And honestly, interesting is not the same as entertaining; and what was revolutionary or groundbreaking 3 or 4 decades ago is not so much these days.
 
I haven't seen what comments Peters made exactly, but I do have how all of this might have played out if he had been more cooperative. Obviously CBS is fine with fan films in general, so it would seem to me that Peters himself is the cause of all of the drama, and if he had behaved differently this might not have ended up turning into such a fiasco. The fact that he keeps making posts about continuing production alone could be a bad idea. If somebody is threatening to shut you down, it could be seen as taunting them when you keep talking about how excited you are about the business.
More importantly, faced with the threat of a full trial his conduct is totally contrary to his supposed desire to work with the studio, especially with an application for injunctive relief pending.

I don't know what the court's view or powers are on costs in California, but over here in the UK a court has the discretion to penalise a party on costs over where conduct is concerned (be it a reduction on costs claim if the party with poor conduct is successful, or unassessed indemnity costs in other situations). It would have been sensible for Peters to halt production pending the outcome of the, at the very least, the application for an injunction, if not the trial itself. By pressing ahead he's potentially making things even more difficult for himself and sending out a message of non-cooperation to the studio and the court. Still, it would certainly be consistent with his widely reported narcissism and hubris.
 
I meet Gerrold a few years ago at WonderCon. He was nice enough and we had a long chat about his writing, journalism and other things. But he's trying to out Ellison Harlan Ellison nowadays.

Careful; if he gets wind of that, Ellison will sue Gerrold for trying to out-Ellison him, and we don't want another lawsuit on our hands! :eek:
 
You don't out-Ellison Harlan Ellison. I admire that man for attaining the levels of "blunt curmudgeon" he has reached. :lol:

Hey, I like DG. I aspire one day to be as surly. :)
I'm a writer myself, and if I could be as abrasive as Harlan Ellison, I'd consider myself as having finally made it! :lol:

Joking aside, I like David Gerrold, too. I still have my copy of The Trouble with Tribbles, where he described the process behind the episode. I like his sense of humor. I do think he's wrong here, though, and that he most assuredly has a dog in the fight.
 
I meet Gerrold a few years ago at WonderCon. He was nice enough and we had a long chat about his writing, journalism and other things. But he's trying to out Ellison Harlan Ellison nowadays.

Careful; if he gets wind of that, Ellison will sue Gerrold for trying to out-Ellison him, and we don't want another lawsuit on our hands! :eek:

Luckily for Gerrold, him and Ellison are friends. ;)
 
I meet Gerrold a few years ago at WonderCon. He was nice enough and we had a long chat about his writing, journalism and other things. But he's trying to out Ellison Harlan Ellison nowadays.

Careful; if he gets wind of that, Ellison will sue Gerrold for trying to out-Ellison him, and we don't want another lawsuit on our hands! :eek:

Luckily for Gerrold, him and Ellison are friends. ;)

It's Ellison, that wouldn't stop him! :p
 
Didn't Gerrold appear as an Enterprise crewman in Trials and Tribbleations?

Yep as a redshirt.

gerrold.jpg


EDIT: Joel Kirk and I jinxed each other. :)
 
I thought so - I remember him mentioning that he'd brought his son along that day and he asked, word for word, the exact same question he had asked decades before when they filmed Trouble With Tribbles
 
I thought so - I remember him mentioning that he'd brought his son along that day and he asked, word for word, the exact same question he had asked decades before when they filmed Trouble With Tribbles

Wonder what the question was...

He was also a crewman in TMP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top