Ladies fingers....It's going to be a LOOOOOOOOONG weekend.
I've never tried Okra, what's it like ?
Ladies fingers....It's going to be a LOOOOOOOOONG weekend.
I've never tried Okra, what's it like ?
There's three types of people.
Type one are criminals by choice. They'll break the law without much thought. Bad people.
Type two generally view rules and the law as boundaries and observe them, either because it's the right thing to do, or because of the consequences. Good (or frightened) people.
Type three do pretty much what they like until they're stopped. They view being stopped as something to challenge - they tend not to let things stop them. They'll be bankrupt and set up again, they'll be sued and carry on doing whatever it was anyway. They'll continually butt up against disgruntled people and companies, lawsuits, whatever.
Where most people would be mortified, it's like water off a ducks back with them. They'll push it to the limits and move on. Morals and 'right' don't come into it and the law is determined by whether you win or lose the case. These people are over represented in government, big business, senior management. And fan-films...
I would have thought so, wouldn't you?There's three types of people.
Type one are criminals by choice. They'll break the law without much thought. Bad people.
Type two generally view rules and the law as boundaries and observe them, either because it's the right thing to do, or because of the consequences. Good (or frightened) people.
Type three do pretty much what they like until they're stopped. They view being stopped as something to challenge - they tend not to let things stop them. They'll be bankrupt and set up again, they'll be sued and carry on doing whatever it was anyway. They'll continually butt up against disgruntled people and companies, lawsuits, whatever.
Where most people would be mortified, it's like water off a ducks back with them. They'll push it to the limits and move on. Morals and 'right' don't come into it and the law is determined by whether you win or lose the case. These people are over represented in government, big business, senior management. And fan-films...
So going by that Alac Peters is a type three personality ?
There's three types of people.
Type one are criminals by choice. They'll break the law without much thought. Bad people.
Type two generally view rules and the law as boundaries and observe them, either because it's the right thing to do, or because of the consequences. Good (or frightened) people.
Type three do pretty much what they like until they're stopped. They view being stopped as something to challenge - they tend not to let things stop them. They'll be bankrupt and set up again, they'll be sued and carry on doing whatever it was anyway. They'll continually butt up against disgruntled people and companies, lawsuits, whatever.
Where most people would be mortified, it's like water off a ducks back with them. They'll push it to the limits and move on. Morals and 'right' don't come into it and the law is determined by whether you win or lose the case. These people are over represented in government, big business, senior management. And fan-films...
So going by that Alac Peters is a type three personality ?
You may very well believe that. I, of course, could not possibly coment...
I suspect the studio waited until it was clearly a back door profit making exercise.Hi everyone,
It's been many years since I've come to the Trek BBS, but the recent Axanar litigation peaked my interest. I am not an attorney, but I have written and reported on legal matters for over 15 years and I've already posted my first impressions of the CBS/Paramount complaint on my personal website.
The item that stood out to me in the complaint was the citation of four specific characters used by Axanar from the "copyrighted works": Sarek, Richard Robau, Soval, and Robert April. As I noted in my blog, the use of Gary Graham as Soval in "Prelude to Axanar" may be enough to sink Peters & Axanar Productions on a summary judgment motion (meaning this case will never even get to a jury).
Robau is also notable because he is a character exclusively from JJ-trek. As others have commented here, while CBS has generally taken a permissive stance towards fan films, Paramount has not, and I tend to agree with those who have argued Axanar's incorporation of JJ-trek elements (which I believe all the other fan films avoid) may have been a key factor prompting this lawsuit.
(On a side note, I laughed when the complaint cited April, a character who only appeared in TAS; I guess the Animated Series is back in the canon now. Hooray!)
The big question I have is why CBS and Paramount waited this long to put a stop to Axanar. I understand corporate legal departments can be slow to respond, but Peters has been operating out in the open for more than two years now. Once "Prelude" was released, CBS and Paramount had all the reason they needed to pounce. I respect their right to enforce their IP, but I wish they had done so before thousands of donors gave money to a legally doomed project.
Correction: Star Trek fan film groups would be able to do as they like. Other studios would immediately start cracking down on fan films of their properties (Batman, Star Wars, etc) in an effort to prevent what happed to CBS from happening to them.(In the event CBS/Paramount somehow fails to prevail; and loses the ability to enforce/license a portion or all of the Star Trek trademarks, etc. - Fan Film groups will be able to do pretty much as they like going forward.)
Con: If 100% of their fans boycott Beyond we'll lose 780,000.
They can easily pick that up by winning the lawsuit. Plus, most will end up watching Beyond anyway.
So Mr. Peters might think he has leverage to make them want to avoid actually going before a Judge; and thus will somehow get CBS/Paramount to settle out of court (which is what happens in 90%+ of civil cases); and get a settlement that allows his group to complete Axanar in some fashion.
I suspect the studio waited until it was clearly a back door profit making exercise.
I reas your erudite blog piece with interest and generally agree with it's conclusions,
Con: If 100% of their fans boycott Beyond we'll lose 780,000.
They can easily pick that up by winning the lawsuit. Plus, most will end up watching Beyond anyway.
Well, yeah. And that $780,000 loss isn't even a drop in the bucket compared to what Beyond is likely to generate.
Also, since the Axanards are posting random things...feel free to use this as counter:
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.