Next topic: Presidential Elections on Earth during the Dark Times (c. 1800-2150, PFC; Pre-First Contact)
The 19th to 22nd century was a transitory period in human history. Several developments were taking place, democratization, and multiplication of information supply being the most predominant of these within the context of this subject.
The process of democratization didn't go as smoothly as its propagandists of the day pictured it. In fact, there was not much of what actually would be called a 'democracy' in modern Federation parlance. It was mainly the popular perception of who
should hold power that shifted during this time; from a general approval of autocracy or aristocracy to what they termed "democracy".
The popular media espoused the image that the people could elect their leaders, who would then act as representatives for them, and act in their general best interests. However,
de facto most decisions were either made or heavily influenced by the groups that wielded major economic power in each state. What human societies actually achieved during this period therefore was not the transfer of power to a truly democratic government, but hiding better who ultimately held said power, and presenting the results of any actual decisions taken in such a way that popular opinion would perceive the decision to be taken according to the principles of their aforementioned "democracy".
Take for example presidential elections as held in different nation-states on earth during this period. Alledgedly, anyone could become a candidate. In practice, however, those candidates almost invariable came from an elitary background, with families, social circles and education that had thoroughly prepared them for just such a function. And even if not, they had to work their way up, first. Of course, said background was duly suppressed during the "campaigns" which tended to stress the everyman, congenial character of the candidate, notwithstanding the fact that one usually had to have considerable monetary means at his disposal (either private or funded) to succesfully wage said 'campaign'.
This also led to attempts to curry favour by brandishing void political statements, and, in general, to confuse form with content. Whenever such a person became president, he (or she) usually had to renege on "campaign promises".
Of course today the entire societal structure would be considered hypocritical, yet contemporary historians still view this phase as an indispensible stepping stone toward true democracy, as people at least got used to thinking about 'democratic' principles, and, precisely because it was mislabeled 'democracy', gradually gained insight in the deficiencies of their political system.
Next topic: Explain the fun of the game "explain it to Data", to Data.