• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Star Trek Encyclopedia getting first update since 1999!

Re: UPDATED Star Trek Encyclopedia - fall 2016!

This is cool. I lost my ST Encyclopedia (along with a bunch of other Trek books) when I moved a few years ago so it'll be nice to replace it with this.
 
Re: UPDATED Star Trek Encyclopedia - fall 2016!

It looks to be a two-volume set (with slipcase), for $99.99 SRP:

http://www.trektoday.com/content/2015/08/star-trek-encyclopedia-update/

LOL, bet James Dixon's gonna hate this... :lol: :guffaw:

Hate to ask, but offhand I can only remember James Dixon as the maker of a detailed Star Trek timeline I've seen online. What would his beef with this book be?

That it isn't his timeline.

Well, there was more to Dixon than that...

Leto, you can get a bit of an overview about Dixon here:

http://www.wrstone.com/wrstone/jackelope/hoff/fiawol/james_dixon

including links to some of his stuff.

Long story short, he had some extreme ideas about "canon", even by most canon-istas' standards. Unless it was Shane Johnson...or Okuda. Then it appeared to just be spite.

By the same token, he caught onto the "groupthink" tendencies that were just starting to sprout up in Trek fandom back in the mid-late 90s that still make life difficult for the "unmutual" today.
 
Last edited:
Re: UPDATED Star Trek Encyclopedia - fall 2016!

Hate to ask, but offhand I can only remember James Dixon as the maker of a detailed Star Trek timeline I've seen online. What would his beef with this book be?

That it isn't his timeline.

Well, there was more to Dixon than that...

Leto, you can get a bit of an overview about Dixon here:

http://www.wrstone.com/wrstone/jackelope/hoff/fiawol/james_dixon

including links to some of his stuff.

Long story short, he had some extreme ideas about "canon", even by most canon-istas' standards. Unless it was Shane Johnson...or Okuda. Then it appeared to just be spite.

I've dealt with Dixon here... it wasn't a pleasant experience.
 
Re: UPDATED Star Trek Encyclopedia - fall 2016!

That it isn't his timeline.

Well, there was more to Dixon than that...

Leto, you can get a bit of an overview about Dixon here:

http://www.wrstone.com/wrstone/jackelope/hoff/fiawol/james_dixon

including links to some of his stuff.

Long story short, he had some extreme ideas about "canon", even by most canon-istas' standards. Unless it was Shane Johnson...or Okuda. Then it appeared to just be spite.

I've dealt with Dixon here... it wasn't a pleasant experience.

Have any links handy? I'd love to read up about him...
 
I loved the Star Trek Encyclopedia.

Picked up the first version by chance and I must have read it cover to cover, spent hours going back and forth, looking up facts, cross-referencing. Generally boring anybody around me with everything I was reading. The good old days. :)

Looking forward to this new version, hoping it's worth the price tag.
 
Re: UPDATED Star Trek Encyclopedia - fall 2016!

Well, there was more to Dixon than that...

Leto, you can get a bit of an overview about Dixon here:

http://www.wrstone.com/wrstone/jackelope/hoff/fiawol/james_dixon

including links to some of his stuff.

Long story short, he had some extreme ideas about "canon", even by most canon-istas' standards. Unless it was Shane Johnson...or Okuda. Then it appeared to just be spite.

I've dealt with Dixon here... it wasn't a pleasant experience.

Have any links handy? I'd love to read up about him...

THIS was his last TrekBBS persona.

Back on topic, I just LOVE that it's the command insignia from the reboot movies on the cover :D
 
Wow. I was aware of his huge timeline, but never knew all those crazy details. Very interesting bit of fandom history there.
 
I did not know that he was still around that recently. I thought he basically vanished into the ether back in the late 90s-early 00s.

He could go from making a good point to ranting almost fanatically in the space of the same post some times...

Then there's stuff like this (from his critique of the first TNG Tech Manual):

This is hardly worth mentioning, but it is a conflict. On Emergency Landing Of The Saucer Module, the book states that preferable landing sites include beach sand, deep water, smooth ice, and grassy plains on Class M worlds. In Generations, they crash the ship into a forest--with nasty effects upon the hull! This whole portion of the movie is bizarre in itself: first the secondary hull is destroyed and then a planet comes up on the saucer section apparently out of nowhere (at least this is how its presented to the audience) and they seem to have no alternative but to ground the saucer section. No attempt to lock into a stable orbit Or scan for a landing site.

If he were here, I'd ask him if he'd even seen the film, or if he was working off of a bad description of it, because everything he challenges is made pretty clear in the scene: They never made it out of orbit before the 2ndary exploded. The shockwave from that knocked them into the upper atmosphere and damaged the primary helm controls. By the time Deanna was able to get at least some helm function restored they were committed to the descent and all they could do was keep the saucer straight and level and hope for the best.
 
I was a lurker when Lenny was around. It was a bit of a case of 'speak of the devil and he appears'. Is Dixon still claiming to be dead?

As for the Encyclopedia, I'm just hoping I don't have a 3 year wait for a local release. Large books like that cost too much to import.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top