• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Glen Larson's BSG novels from the 80s

Heck, I bought these books when they first came out! I was obsessed with Starbuck--the original character played Dirk Benedict--when I was a little girl. When first one came out--79 or 80--I was about 10 or 11. I think the last one came out after I graduated high school. I don't recall them being terribly well-written but they were better written than the series, for what it's worth. But it filled my school-age self with joy just to have them.

Here's a pic of the ones I've held onto for all these years. Sorry about the crappy picture quality; not the best camera ever.

I'm amazed you kept them in that quality all those years. I don't think I own anything from that age that is in any kind of condition.
 
Heh. My mom once worked as a librarian. I was well-trained to value books and keep them in fairly good condition. Hell, I still have my Man From UNCLE paperbacks that I bought from a garage sale in high school; they were published three years before I was born. I still have them; they're a bit fragile and pretty yellowed, but I have them.
 
There are some hardcore old school TOSser's for Galactica that hated the new series....many of them saying that they could watch the original series with their kids, and that they could not watch the new series with them....for some reasons including stronger language.

.

I'm sure it had nothing to do with the over-the-top Baltar masturbation scene.

Honestly, I'm not sure that should be sole determinant of quality. The world is full of great shows that are not suitable for children. ("But I can't watch DEXTER or THE AMERICANS with my kids!")

Nobody ever said every sci-fi show has to be family-friendly.

Me, I'll take the reboot over the original BSG any day.
 
Here's a pic of the ones I've held onto for all these years.

I haven't kept any of mine, but I remember having at least the pilot novelization, War of the Gods, and Galactica Discovers Earth (probably the first thing I ever read by Michael Resnick, whom I'm actually acquainted with now -- small world).


To be fair, sorta, the tendency to use terms like "universe" and "galaxy" and "system" interchangeably was pretty widespread in TV series at the time. I remember it used to drive me nuts that mysterious alien visitors were almost always from "another galaxy," even though our own galaxy was more than big enough to provide enough aliens to populate plenty of UFO story lines. I guess "from a distant solar system" just didn't sound impressive enough.

What bugs the heck out of me is the pervasive use of "intergalactic" to mean anything space-related at all. I once saw a TV listing describe Total Recall as a tale of "intergalactic intrigue" or something like that. Earth to Mars. Intergalactic. That's like walking one block and calling it interplanetary travel.

A lot of people simply don't understand what a galaxy is, or have any understanding of the scale of things in space. I once read this art book, a set of various pieces of space art accompanied by a crude epistolary narrative the artist had contrived to link them loosely together. At one point, the narrator character was en route to Earth, and the narration said something like, "We're about two light-years from Earth now. Only a few more galaxies to go."
 
I dunno that I'd go as far as some here in pillorying Larson's writing overall without first looking at a broarder swath of his work than the shows he produced. He wrote a bunch of McCloud's, for instance. Maybe they suck, but I won't presume they do on the basis of Manimal. ;)
 
Last edited:
I guess the beef over GALACTICA was that it was (allegedly) a STAR WARS knock-off
But wasn't the network basically looking for a Star Wars knock off? As I understand it, the initial interest behind the Star Trek Phase II TV series was the success of Star Wars.
 
I guess the beef over GALACTICA was that it was (allegedly) a STAR WARS knock-off
But wasn't the network basically looking for a Star Wars knock off? As I understand it, the initial interest behind the Star Trek Phase II TV series was the success of Star Wars.

But that doesn't mean it was conceived as a Star Wars knockoff. Larson had been developing the premise in one form or another since the 1960s (originally under the name Adam's Ark). The success of SW was what convinced a network to buy it at last, because they were looking for SW-like properties and that one was already out there.

Also, BSG had some creative talent in common with Star Wars, like John Dykstra and his visual effects team, and Ralph McQuarrie as a concept artist. As a result, they had similar looks, and people who didn't read the credits mistook that continuity of design for imitation.
 
One concept I remember from the novels which unfortunately was beyond the scope of then current SFX to show us on screen-
When the Cylon Raiders were in combat they used a tactic called a 'Pinwheel Attack' where three Raiders would swirl around a Viper, trapping it inside until they destroyed it. The closest we ever saw of this was seeing the Raiders travelling in groups of three and the shot of the Raiders whirling down to a planet from orbit during an attack...

There was one novel I read involving Cain- I do not know if it was one Larson 'wrote'. Cain had established a base and was constructing a new Battlestar. He had a trick where two modified Vipers would leave the launch tube connected and fight joined together for a while with each covering the others blindspot in the firing arcs. Does anybody remember this book and what the title was?
 
There was one novel I read involving Cain- I do not know if it was one Larson 'wrote'. Cain had established a base and was constructing a new Battlestar. He had a trick where two modified Vipers would leave the launch tube connected and fight joined together for a while with each covering the others blindspot in the firing arcs. Does anybody remember this book and what the title was?

Sounds like Warhawk
 
I guess the beef over GALACTICA was that it was (allegedly) a STAR WARS knock-off
But wasn't the network basically looking for a Star Wars knock off? As I understand it, the initial interest behind the Star Trek Phase II TV series was the success of Star Wars.

Not really. In the mid 1970ies Paramount was looking to start it's own TV network (like FOX eventually did decades later) and 'Star Trek Phase II' (Star Trek's popularity was confirmed by the response the the animated series).

While Phase II was still in pre-production (and some film tests of new sets and costumes had been done); "Star Wars" and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" came out, did very well in theatres. Paramount had originally planned to do ST Phase II on a budget similar to the original series. After they saw the level of special effects in Star Wars and Close Encounters, they know that what they were planning for TV wouldn't fly for even a TV audience; so they scrapped the idea of a 'new network' and started retooling 'Star trek Phase II' into a feature film (with high quality visual effects as well) to capitalize on the 'Star Wars phenomenon. They still felt they got a late start in that arena, and that's why many aspects of the production were rushed because they were worried by the time they got it out - the current 'fad' would have faded and affected BO returns.
 
There are some hardcore old school TOSser's for Galactica that hated the new series....many of them saying that they could watch the original series with their kids, and that they could not watch the new series with them....for some reasons including stronger language.

.

I'm sure it had nothing to do with the over-the-top Baltar masturbation scene.

Honestly, I'm not sure that should be sole determinant of quality. The world is full of great shows that are not suitable for children. ("But I can't watch DEXTER or THE AMERICANS with my kids!")

Nobody ever said every sci-fi show has to be family-friendly.

Me, I'll take the reboot over the original BSG any day.

Oh I love the show. I would never dream about showing kids the show though. It's great because of the sex and violence!
 
My son and I are watching the premier episode of TOS-BSG while model building together. I am putting together the new Moebius kit of the Galactica and he is building the USS Arizona. After this show we are watching 'Tora, Tora, Tora' (he is eleven and not quite ready for the unedited Pearl Harbor film yet).
 
There are some hardcore old school TOSser's for Galactica that hated the new series....many of them saying that they could watch the original series with their kids, and that they could not watch the new series with them....for some reasons including stronger language.

.

I'm sure it had nothing to do with the over-the-top Baltar masturbation scene.

Honestly, I'm not sure that should be sole determinant of quality. The world is full of great shows that are not suitable for children. ("But I can't watch DEXTER or THE AMERICANS with my kids!")

Nobody ever said every sci-fi show has to be family-friendly.

Me, I'll take the reboot over the original BSG any day.
I like both shows a lot. I've only seen a couple episodes of the original, and they were fun in a goofy, cheesy kind of way. The Moore series on the other hand, was a great serious modern drama series.
I'm also a huge fan of True Blood, Game of Thrones, and Banshee, so a show being family friendly doesn't really matter to me. I like plenty of family friendly shows too though.
 
Just tonight, I discovered that the original BATTLESTAR GALACTICA series creator, Glen Larson, wrote a series of novels based on the original series, which were published throughout the 1980s. I stumbled upon these books on the Amazon site. I also discovered that Richard Hatch (Captain Apollo in the original BSG; Tom Zarek in the 2004 BSG remake) wrote some of his own BSG original series-derived novels.

Has anyone here ever read any of these novels?
I have all of the Larson novels and one of the Hatch novels. Haven't read the Hatch one yet.

Most of them are still in brand-new condition. You can't tell them from right off the shelf.

A lot of people simply don't understand what a galaxy is, or have any understanding of the scale of things in space. I once read this art book, a set of various pieces of space art accompanied by a crude epistolary narrative the artist had contrived to link them loosely together. At one point, the narrator character was en route to Earth, and the narration said something like, "We're about two light-years from Earth now. Only a few more galaxies to go."
Sounds like the pack of idiots currently attempting to write astronomy articles for the CBC.ca website (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation). The latest goof was an article yesterday about one of the exoplanets, which "at 21 light-years away is the closest rocky planet to Earth."

Apparently Mercury, Venus, Mars, Ceres, and Pluto (yes, I know the last two are officially dwarf planets) are made of marshmallows, or something...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top