• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Ptrope gets his feet wet - AquaShuttle 2.5

Ptrope

Agitator
Admiral
"2.5" because I already started on a "2.0" version several years ago, but I've since revisited it and decided to make it even more aquatic - the idea was to look to small launches and luxury yachts for detailing. Despite all that, it still looks like this ;) :

WIP001:
aquashuttle_2_5___wip001_by_ptrope-d8u1oub.jpg



WIP002:
aquashuttle_2_5___wip003_by_ptrope-d8ugjcy.jpg



WIP003:
aquashuttle_2_5___wip004_by_ptrope-d8uhmvd.jpg

(This was before I upscaled the entire thing to 140%)


WIP004 (starting on the interior):
aquashuttle_2_5___wip006_by_ptrope-d8uwtyo.jpg



WIP005 (detailing the berths in the bow):
aquashuttle_2_5___wip007_by_ptrope-d8v8bjn.jpg



WIP006 (more interior detail, and the 'airlock forcefield' set up on the main doorway - thanks to Madison Bruffy for the idea!):
aquashuttle_2_5___wip009_by_ptrope-d8vu8ri.jpg



WIP007 (focus on rebuilding the dashboard and controls):
aquashuttle_2_5___wip010_by_ptrope-d8wbbm6.jpg
 
Does it really need a scantily clad caricature of a woman?
 
Yes.

She's not really a caricature - I was trying to establish some scale, and she happened to be a figure I had already created and saved who was wearing a swimsuit. So "scantily clad" is, I think, overstating things - she's wearing a swimsuit on a boat, which is pretty much normal where I come from ;).
 
If you say so. Just keep kidding yourself on those points.
 
Hey, not my problem. I think I know my work better than anyone, and my motivations. You don't agree - that's your right, but don't tell me what I think.
 
I'm not sold on the brown color, but I like the "planks" comprising the main deck up top. I've been considering them from the point of view of drainage and safety. From my (admittedly very limited) knowledge, it seems like all the channels between the "planks" running fore to aft would help keep water from pooling on deck, at least provided the overall drainage plan makes sense.

Speaking of safety, the existence of the hand grips around the bow berths and elsewhere implies that the craft is designed to run on the water with inertial dampeners not in use.

That said, it seems that there are both a lot of steps in the interior and especially steps without hand grips, both of which and especially the latter of which seem to be contrary to safety considerations.

And, yes, as MadMan1701A points out, the larger it gets, the less likely it will fit on the Enterprise. Even if it does fit on the hangar deck to land, it still has to get stowed somewhere (presumably).

Nevertheless, loving it.
 
I for one am disappointed any time I see a picture that does not include a girl in a bikini. Well done, sir.

--Alex
 
I'm not sold on the brown color, but I like the "planks" comprising the main deck up top. I've been considering them from the point of view of drainage and safety. From my (admittedly very limited) knowledge, it seems like all the channels between the "planks" running fore to aft would help keep water from pooling on deck, at least provided the overall drainage plan makes sense.

I was trying to provide an actual wood deck there, or whatever synthetic equivalent they could devise in the 23rd century that would have the look and feel of a quality teak deck (hence the color) but still survive the rigors of both space and high-speed submarine operations. It really is all about getting as much of a 'boat-like' feel as possible ;)

Speaking of safety, the existence of the hand grips around the bow berths and elsewhere implies that the craft is designed to run on the water with inertial dampeners not in use.

That said, it seems that there are both a lot of steps in the interior and especially steps without hand grips, both of which and especially the latter of which seem to be contrary to safety considerations.

Eh, only 2 steps up to the flight deck, 2 down again to the berths and the forward hatch, and the ones in the main doorway. The interior is still very much unfinished, so I will definitely be adding some more railings where I can, without being too intrusive. Being a 4-person shuttle, I don't know how much inertial dampening it even really would have. The grips along the berths were actually intended more for locomotion in a cramped space than for safety ;).

And, yes, as MadMan1701A points out, the larger it gets, the less likely it will fit on the Enterprise. Even if it does fit on the hangar deck to land, it still has to get stowed somewhere (presumably).

Nevertheless, loving it.

Thanks! I'm still wondering about all that, myself ;). The aquashuttle in "The Ambergris Element" seemed to be pretty good-sized, and I don't know how much thought was ever given to stowage. Since we saw it only once, it's possible it was only brought aboard for specialized missions and was kept in the bay itself, only as long as it took to get to the mission destination. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it! ;)

Well, I think the model is cool. :)

Is it too wide for the Enterprise's shuttlebay, though?

-Ricky

And thanks, again! I'll have to do a comparison render - just another good excuse for an exterior shot! ;).
 
Being a 4-person shuttle, I don't know how much inertial dampening it even really would have.

[Hocus TrekTech]

It wouldn't be about the number of people aboard but how many gees it could pull while sublight and whether it's warp-capable. It's pretty much a given that all Star Trek vessels that are warp-capable have inertial dampeners to keep the crew from being straight-up killed while using the warp drive. I see a couple of warp nacelles there, and if it can get into orbit in a matter of seconds from class M planets, then it has to have inertial dampeners for that reason too.

But since they'd pretty much have to be there anyway, I was just pointing out that having them on either while the craft is on rough waters or while it's (aggressively) maneuvering on the surface would solve a lot of problems, including allowing the crew to move around inside without having to worry about, frankly, getting injured. But that's no reason not to think about how to move around, avoid falling, etc. when they're not on.

[/Hocus TrekTech]
 
Well, one could always reason that the inertial dampers are only used when at warp or impulse speeds, and not while moving at the relatively slow speeds used while in 'aquatic' mode ;).
 
You need to bring back the buxom yeoman. Y'know...to continue to establish the scale of the shuttle. :shifty:

In all seriousness, though, this is REALLY nice work. Hope to see some orthos when she's done... The shuttle, I mean... :cool:
 
Well, the buxom yeoman IS 140% larger than Verena, in the first shot, so not much would change ;).

Thanks! As close as I've come to an ortho so far is a pseudo-artsy low-light side view - it really shows more of the shuttle than I wanted, but I didn't want to paint over it ;).

aquashuttle_2_5___wip008_by_ptrope-d8v9ohm.jpg
 
Nice looking design. The profile just looks so much like the Calypso.

Being a 4-person shuttle, I don't know how much inertial dampening it even really would have.

[Hocus TrekTech]

It wouldn't be about the number of people aboard but how many gees it could pull while sublight and whether it's warp-capable. It's pretty much a given that all Star Trek vessels that are warp-capable have inertial dampeners to keep the crew from being straight-up killed while using the warp drive. I see a couple of warp nacelles there, and if it can get into orbit in a matter of seconds from class M planets, then it has to have inertial dampeners for that reason too.

But since they'd pretty much have to be there anyway, I was just pointing out that having them on either while the craft is on rough waters or while it's (aggressively) maneuvering on the surface would solve a lot of problems, including allowing the crew to move around inside without having to worry about, frankly, getting injured. But that's no reason not to think about how to move around, avoid falling, etc. when they're not on.

[/Hocus TrekTech]

Actually, I'm not sure that going to warp produces that many gees, if any at all. Otherwise, that'd mean that the Phoenix must've had them, otherwise Cochrane and whoever else was flying with him in any timeline would've been turned to mush as soon as the Phoenix went to warp.

This means that either the inertial dampener was likely invented before WW-III, or going to warp produces negligible to no gees.

I think it is the impulse drives that causes the dangerous accelerations to the point that g-forces become deadly.

And if it is capable as maneuvering as well as a race boat, it'd need more than hand holds for the safety of the crew. Either inertial dampeners, or safety harnesses to keep the crew strapped in.

Well, one could always reason that the inertial dampers are only used when at warp or impulse speeds, and not while moving at the relatively slow speeds used while in 'aquatic' mode ;).

I actually kind of like the idea of it being able to travel at supersonic speeds, even underwater.

Why?

Well, this comes from reports of UFOs/USOs being able to travel at high speed, even at supersonic speeds, even submerged, in real life.

I'm thinking that maybe at this point, Federation technology is advanced enough that this sort of feat is trivial, especially for a specialized flying submersible. I'm guess it would use some sort of specialized forcefield that would minimize the displacement of water, and so prevent underwater shockwaves.
Actually, this is probably how all ships prevent themselves from creating a sonic boom at supersonic speeds, because lets face it, their air frames are clearly not made to prevent or reduce sonic booms.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top