I'm forced to agree about the fanwank in Season Four. As I stated earlier, the episodes seemed like they were structured very well, but the stories themselves just weren't as interesting ... especially compared to the third season.
But yeah, Season 4 was good, too. I was legtinately depressed for a while when the series was cancelled, especially since it'd not been so log since Farscape was cancelled, too. My teenage heart had been stabbed.
As I have written here since season 4 ended, that it was the most consistent season of the show's run because it had the fewest number of clunker episodes.Well ... T'Pol did remind the father in the end that, "Elizabeth was important."TP apparently felt that showing the baby would be pivotal in swaying public opinion to their side and against Starfleet.
This is the reason I stated that the baby's role was a lot more significant than you may have understood it to be.
Let me ask you, gblews: Did you feel that the 4th season of -ENTERPRISE- was "so much better than the rest"? I'm in full agreement with O'Conner, in preferring Season Three. Personally, I just found it to be much more satisfying ... in the final analysis.
That makes a lot of sense. To be honest, I blame Braga for a lot of problems in Star Trek but I've tried to convince myself that I'm being too hard on him. Berman pisses me off too but from what I can tell, he was heavily involved in DS9 and I love it to bits. That just leads me to believe Braga is the main issue but it's hard to tell.
It's too bad it was cancelled. I think it would've been interesting to explore the arc of T'pol being half Romulan, although I really dislike them.
I thought the reason for a 4th season was 'cuz it made for a better syndication packageAlthough the essential change was the creative input and control of Manny Coto in the fourth season, the attitude of the executives at UPN made a profound impact on the show. Viacom restructered UPN, putting it under the control of CBS' Leslie Moonves, who was less attached to Star Trek as the emblem of the network than in the show's profitability. He directed Berman and Braga to change the direction of Enterprise, leading to the Xindi arc. Although season 3 produced modest improvements, the show would have been cancelled had not the television division of UPN agreed to further reforms of the show, which included replacing Berman and Braga as producers.I've seen this sentiment all across the internet, as well as heard it from friends. Did UPN stop trying to throw their two cents in on every story or what? Season 4 seems to be what I had originally thought Enterprise would be. I'm just wondering if Berman and Braga finally got more say or if producers realized they'd pissed off the fans to the point that they had to try to appease them.
IMHO, season three was superior to four. Unpredictable and exciting.
Four is fun, but it's mostly continuity porn aimed at die-hards.
UPN's biggest problem was depending on Star Trek to be its anchor, and not coming up with anything that was long lasting for its other nights. When Trek started getting pre-empted for WWE, the writing was on the wall.
It's Trek, it wouldn't be the same without the fan wank.
It's Trek, it wouldn't be the same without the fan wank. ENT just had to pull it off a bit earlier than the other shows did.
It's Trek, it wouldn't be the same without the fan wank. ENT just had to pull it off a bit earlier than the other shows did.
I don't remember any of the other trek series being "Fan-wanky" though, other than maybe the two episodes celebrating Trek's 30th anniversary (Trials and Tribble-Ations and Flashback)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.