I suggest you look up the meaning of the word, "tart" when used to describe a woman, bro.I'm talking about T'pol's using cosmetics like a hotty would. I'm talking about wigs that look realistic and styled ... possibly even tinted. I'm talking about Season 4 finally realising that it's OK for Jolene Blalock to look great on STAR TREK television ... if somewhat belatedly.Season 4 they tarted her up, appropriately ...I have no idea of what you're talking about here.
That whole Terra Prime thing was very well written. I understand the stated reason for the T'Pol/Trip hybrid, but if it were taken out of the story, would it really change things that much? It seemed a little forced to me, like what terrorist would really need that, when the scars from the Xindi attack were still fresh?
The baby actually played a pretty important role; she was presented by Terra Prime to all of Earth as evidence that human/alien (in this case Vulcan) interbreeding could yield offspring. This allowed Terra Prime to stoke fears that the human race could (or would) be bred out of existence.That whole Terra Prime thing was very well written. I understand the stated reason for the T'Pol/Trip hybrid, but if it were taken out of the story, would it really change things that much? It seemed a little forced to me, like what terrorist would really need that, when the scars from the Xindi attack were still fresh?
I agree about that. I think it was just inserted by B/B to justify Trip and T'Pol being split up in TATV.
I thought that was a parallel with the hypocrisy of the Nazis, i.e. none of the big leaders resembled a blond Aryan superman. Goering was obese; Goebbels had a club foot. Maybe the point is that, with this kind of extremist position, some sort of illicit compromise is inevitable.it did feel kind of manipulative. And that's always bugged me, because it seemed like it was there, mostly to motivate the audience into siding with The Good Guys. Same as giving Peter Weller's character a disease that only alien medicine could cure, to make him come off as a hypocrite. Is it not enough that he's prepared to blow up the earth to keep aliens off it?
But if you watch Peter Weller's speech, the baby is basically mentioned as a throw-away line. Also (as I said elsewhere) a cute lil' baby is more likely to make people go goo-goo than scream in outrage. It would have made more sense to crossbreed with something repulsive to humans, e.g. a Tellarite.The baby actually played a pretty important role; she was presented by Terra Prime to all of Earth as evidence that human/alien (in this case Vulcan) interbreeding could yield offspring. This allowed Terra Prime to stoke fears that the human race could (or would) be bred out of existence.
Agreed. Peter's character does excuse his own hypocracy with the dismissive observation that he's "not the first visionary who didn't live up to his own ideals."I thought that was a parallel with the hypocrisy of the Nazis, i.e. none of the big leaders resembled a blond Aryan superman. Goering was obese; Goebbels had a club foot. Maybe the point is that, with this kind of extremist position, some sort of illicit compromise is inevitable.
I wish they would've done it like that - brilliant! And you were right that Berman seems to have never wanted Trip & T'Pol to be anything but Friends with Bennies. Yet, if it was going to be about Trip & T'pol, then she should've gotten pregnant, "recently." This would get leaked to Terra Prime's operative, somehow - even ahead of Trip's knowing. Then kidnap T'Pol to make an example out of her and other mothers who are in a Human/alien relationship. Paxton (?) and his followers can then show that this is becoming much more common. And naturally, yes, the more alien/creature-like looking kid(s) will be marched up to the camera with Peter Weller narrating about the horror of it all.But if you watch Peter Weller's speech, the baby is basically mentioned as a throw-away line. Also (as I said elsewhere) a cute lil' baby is more likely to make people go goo-goo than scream in outrage. It would have made more sense to crossbreed with something repulsive to humans, e.g. a Tellarite.
I think this would have been a much more believable way of handling it, and would have given the characters more of an emotional stake than a surprise clone baby (though the actors did well with the situation). And the crew making a multi-species raid to rescue T'Pol could have helped to show the world who the good guys are.if it was going to be about Trip & T'pol, then she should've gotten pregnant, "recently." This would get leaked to Terra Prime's operative, somehow - even ahead of Trip's knowing.
Season 4 often feels confined by its budget, but Terra Prime does feel especially claustrophobic. Couldn't they even budget for some wider lenses to make stuff look bigger?The actual episode obviously tries hard to stay in controlled situations, to $ave money, and give the existing cast something to do. Unfortunately, the story suffers for it, a little bit.
But if you watch Peter Weller's speech, the baby is basically mentioned as a throw-away line. Also (as I said elsewhere) a cute lil' baby is more likely to make people go goo-goo than scream in outrage. It would have made more sense to crossbreed with something repulsive to humans, e.g. a Tellarite.
Interesting that you should mention the semantics of the speech. I've read, and I've heard Connor Trineer say , that Weller spent a lot of time "in his trailer rewriting his lines". And apparently because of his star power, they allowed him to do that...I wonder if this speech was something that he fiddled with, and perhaps the original speech had the baby mentioned in some other context ?But if you watch Peter Weller's speech, the baby is basically mentioned as a throw-away line. Also (as I said elsewhere) a cute lil' baby is more likely to make people go goo-goo than scream in outrage. It would have made more sense to crossbreed with something repulsive to humans, e.g. a Tellarite.
But if you watch Peter Weller's speech, the baby is basically mentioned as a throw-away line. Also (as I said elsewhere) a cute lil' baby is more likely to make people go goo-goo than scream in outrage. It would have made more sense to crossbreed with something repulsive to humans, e.g. a Tellarite.
However, Vulcans are the ones that have a century-long relationship as overlords --- benevolent, but still overlords --- who could be portrayed as colonizing Earth to the benefit of Vulcan. Tellarites might be uglier, but they haven't got associations like that.
Nick Meyer and other directors have said, before, that actors are great at pointing out that a scene's flawed and not working. BUT ... their solutions are seldom, if ever, actually very useful, at all. I'm convinced of that ...I've read, and I've heard Connor Trineer say , that Weller spent a lot of time "in his trailer rewriting his lines". And apparently because of his star power, they allowed him to do that...I wonder if this speech was something that he fiddled with, and perhaps the original speech had the baby mentioned in some other context ?
Just a thought.![]()
Regardless of your perception of what the reaction to the baby was, my point had to do with the baby's role in TP's little mini revolution.But if you watch Peter Weller's speech, the baby is basically mentioned as a throw-away line. Also (as I said elsewhere) a cute lil' baby is more likely to make people go goo-goo than scream in outrage. It would have made more sense to crossbreed with something repulsive to humans, e.g. a Tellarite.The baby actually played a pretty important role; she was presented by Terra Prime to all of Earth as evidence that human/alien (in this case Vulcan) interbreeding could yield offspring. This allowed Terra Prime to stoke fears that the human race could (or would) be bred out of existence.
Well ... T'Pol did remind the father in the end that, "Elizabeth was important."TP apparently felt that showing the baby would be pivotal in swaying public opinion to their side and against Starfleet.
This is the reason I stated that the baby's role was a lot more significant than you may have understood it to be.
Not really. I really like the second season of TNG (superior cinematography, music and sense of wonder) and I think it's almost universally agreed that the third season is when the series got great (through Michael Piller's writing and creative leadership).It's a Trek show. Everyone knows the odd/even-numbered rule for movies, but we tend to ignore the other rule: Trek shows start with season 4. Season 1-3? Ignore them (for the most part). Works for all the modern-era Treks.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.