If you dont know whether it's you or a copy then it's a difference that makes no difference.
The distant future is all of 30 years from now.
RAMA
It is unfortunate that you betray a lack of comprehension
Don't worry, I'm done engaging you on this.
There can't be any "former" about it.You said, "(A)nd an AI is a kind of computer program, by definition."
I am not sure I agree with that. Isn't an AI a former collection of programs and hardware that has become self-aware ; in effect, conscious?
If it's ever exactly a "collection of programs and hardware," then that's all it will ever be.
Describing it as a "collection of programs and hardware" means that its behavior could be represented with perfect fidelity by a single monolithic program. If the system lacks this property, then it is not a digital computer system. Theoretically, the only program you ever really need is a universal machine (in the software sense). The operation of a universal machine is to emulate other programs, though, where the emulated programs and their data are represented as data, so it still makes sense to speak of a multitude of possible programs, but that's just a point of view.
Thank you, and I understand your answer well. Wow, it sure is something to get ones mind around (no pun intended). I can see us getting to the computing power and speed needed, in the distant future, but I still wonder about the "intangible"?!
The distant future is all of 30 years from now.
RAMA