It would seem to me that whether you give the audience what it wants or deliberately never give the audience what it wants, you are still defined by the audience.
Stan Lee was previously held up in support of said filmmakers as a shining example to follow.It would seem to me that whether you give the audience what it wants or deliberately never give the audience what it wants, you are still defined by the audience.
Yeah, if anything like that were actually the filmmakers decision-making process you'd have a point.
A lot of hard core Trek fans don't belong to Star Trek's target audience.![]()
I don't follow. If Star Trek isn't for us geeks, then who the hell is it for??
I don't understand why you would think that Star Trek films should be aimed primarily at an audience that couldn't possibly financially support the franchise. Are they supposed to be hundred-million-dollar charity cases?
Stan Lee was previously held up in support of said filmmakers as a shining example to follow.It would seem to me that whether you give the audience what it wants or deliberately never give the audience what it wants, you are still defined by the audience.
Yeah, if anything like that were actually the filmmakers decision-making process you'd have a point.
I don't follow. If Star Trek isn't for us geeks, then who the hell is it for??
I don't understand why you would think that Star Trek films should be aimed primarily at an audience that couldn't possibly financially support the franchise. Are they supposed to be hundred-million-dollar charity cases?
I don't actually think that at all. I'm confused as yo why you would think that being a geek means you can't afford a moie ticket.
It would seem to me that whether you give the audience what it wants or deliberately never give the audience what it wants, you are still defined by the audience.
If you don't give a fan what the fan wants, then that fan simply does not belong to your target audience.
A lot of hard core Trek fans don't belong to Star Trek's target audience.![]()
I don't follow. If Star Trek isn't for us geeks, then who the hell is it for??
I don't follow. If Star Trek isn't for us geeks, then who the hell is it for??
I don't understand why you would think that Star Trek films should be aimed primarily at an audience that couldn't possibly financially support the franchise. Are they supposed to be hundred-million-dollar charity cases?
I don't actually think that at all. I'm confused as yo why you would think that being a geek means you can't afford a moie ticket.
Wait, wait, is Frankenstein going to be in primeTrek or nuTrek?
Maybe I clicked on the wrong thread.
Wait, wait, is Frankenstein going to be in primeTrek or nuTrek?
Maybe I clicked on the wrong thread.
Well, you can argue that Data is a modern-day riff on Frankenstein.![]()
...with Nerys Myk making the point that Stan Lee's quote is accepted by or should be applied by filmmakers in response to my suggestion that artists could listen to the audience and the fans among them to consider and evaluate what they have to say.That's nice, and it has to do with...what?Stan Lee was previously held up in support of said filmmakers as a shining example to follow.Yeah, if anything like that were actually the filmmakers decision-making process you'd have a point.It would seem to me that whether you give the audience what it wants or deliberately never give the audience what it wants, you are still defined by the audience.
Of course they are free. Expectations by others are irrelevant to free will. But according to Stan Lee, it should never happen at all, regardless of choice or expectation. And therein lies the difference with him.They are free to do so, of course, but they should never be expected to do so. Therein lies the difference.
I don't understand why you would think that Star Trek films should be aimed primarily at an audience that couldn't possibly financially support the franchise. Are they supposed to be hundred-million-dollar charity cases?
I don't actually think that at all. I'm confused as yo why you would think that being a geek means you can't afford a moie ticket.
Of course you can afford a movie ticket. I can afford to buy a movie ticket, too. The question isn't that. It's whether you, or I, can afford to buy $400M+ worth of movie tickets. The way the movie industry works, audiences are intended to be as large as possible. You get that, right?
I have to ask whether you get it, because you jumped to reading my remarks as if they're aimed at you personally, instead of grasping that movies are expensive to make, ergo they need to appeal to many people so they can be produced affordably.
If a movie only appeals to a small audience, it flops. That's from Hollywood 101.
No, I get it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.