• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

ENT Review - New ST Watcher

voxstella

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Red Shirt
In general, I don't like science fiction shows very much---for example, I hated BSG and Firefly. However, something about ENT kept me watching; I binged the entire series over a week. I enjoyed the main three characters and found some of the some of the issues that ENT covered to be fascinating. That said, I thought that ENT had some serious problems. Specifically, ENT had uneven pacing; pointless plots for the sake of fan service; and characters whom acted as if they were incompetent, melodramatic, or thirteen. Despite these problems, I found ENT to be more captivating than TOS (which is the only other ST show I’ve watched).

Characters:

I enjoyed the main three characters, with Archer being my least favorite. Initially, I found Archer to be extremely unprofessional. He let his personal history overshadow his duties as first space captain of Earth (i.e. his condescension and patronizing tone towards T'Pol despite asking her to stay on Enterprise). Let’s not even get started on Archer’s obsession towards Porthos in spite of his responsibilities towards his crew and role as diplomatic envoy of Earth (i.e. A Night in Sick Bay).

Despite Archer’s negative traits, he did grow on me. Archer was a good representation of humanity. He encompassed a desire to explore and help (albeit with the finesse of a bull in a china shop). He cared, even when proper protocol dictated otherwise.

Archer’s willingness to commit unsavory acts in season 3 turned him into something more than a cocky space cowboy. It made him interesting as opposed to the standard American hero. Whereas the previous 2 seasons portrayed Archer’s actions as righteous, season 3 had him being unsure. His uncertainty in his leadership choices and desperation in fulfilling his mission reflected a maturity that was previously missing from his characterization.

Trip was my favorite character in ENT. With the exception of season 3, he was depicted as a sunny person, confident in his role and eager to explore. He was compassionate and artless and brash at times—but always willing to learn. I thought Trip had a lot of chemistry with the other bridge characters.

Like Archer, I thought Trip's depiction matured in season 3. His hatred towards the Xindi was the other side of his emotional nature. His developing relationship with T'Pol was significant from a symbolic perspective. I loved the episode where he confronted Degra and broke down over Lizzie with T'Pol---the first because it reflects his desire to succumb to his darker urges, the second because it reflects his conflict between being a good senior officer (leader of humanity's last hope) and grieving over his personal loss (his close bond with Lizzie).

I thought T’Pol grew the most in ENT. In the beginning, she was a loyal agent, unquestioning of her society's norms and disapproving of those who behaved warmly to humans (i.e. V’Lar). In the end, she broke so many of her society’s unassailable rules, becoming the first to join Starfleet (home to the “young” humans) and bond with a human (and such an emotional one as well). That T'Pol grew as a result of assault and addiction is somewhat problematic because it suggests her people cannot grow bar extreme external forces. On the other hand, her assault by Tolaris and Trellium addiction can be viewed as the result of her curious nature.

I enjoyed how T’Pol was depicted as an extremely competent woman. There were moments where she was reduced to the damsel in distress (i.e. Raijin, Orions). However, there were more moments that utilized her background as an intelligence operative. That she often engaged in verbal sparring with Trip or Archer and won in their power plays is an inversion of traditional gender tropes and is a far departure from Uhura (TOS) or Chapel.

I enjoyed how T’Pol remained the outsider throughout ENT. First, she was the disdained one, suspected of colluding with the High Command at the expense of Enterprise. Then she was the unruly child, daring to walk where no Vulcan had gone before. That she did it unwillingly was part of what made her journey interesting. Her feelings towards Tolaris’s assault reflected humiliation from succumbing to base emotion and self-hatred for undermining what’s “acceptable.” That she moves past it to indulge in Trellium is remarkable, considering the societal indoctrination and trauma. Similarly fascinating is her relationship with Trip, which is an extension of the outsider theme.

Seasons:

I thought the first two seasons were all right. They followed TOS's planet of the week format. I thought they captured ST’s themes of exploration and optimism (i.e. Breaking the Ice). The crew explored the new and bizarre (i.e. slug that trapped Trip and Archer in goo). However, some of the episodes were really pointless. I thought the heist by the Ferengi was a welcome departure from being attacked by local hostiles or having technology fail in the middle of nowhere. What I didn’t appreciate was the fact that episode was literally nothing more than heisting. There was no character development. I didn’t learn anything particularly profound about Ferengi culture except for their fondness of the shiny.

What kept my attention about TOS was the fact that it used the science fiction medium to push societal issues and make me think. What makes someone real? Nature or nurture? What would it have been like had the later Roman empire never fell? What would Nazi Germany be like? Too often in seasons 1 and 2, there were episodes like the heist by the Ferengi or shore leave at Risa instead of episodes like Cogenitor, Similitude, or Demons/Terra Prime.

Cogenitor examined individual autonomy and cultural relativism. Similitude examined sentience and sacrifice (and love). Demons/Terra Prime acknowledged the fact that space exploration is not without fear of the unknown. For all that Earth has become a united government by Archer’s time, it is still a place where people would react defensively towards the “other.” One hundred years later, and humanity is still striving to better its nature. That Elizabeth died is emotional manipulation (such a cute chubby baby!) and very, very sad. However, the last scene encapsulated the spirit of ST. There is always hope—optimism that we can work together for a better future, that there is a brighter possibility waiting out there.

My personal favorite is season 3. I thought that the main characters developed greatly in this season. Archer had to face what it means to be a captain. Trip had to deal with his grief. T’Pol made extremely poor life decisions. Shockingly, the other characters even had meaty parts (Malcolm and his power play with Hayes/MACOs, Hoshi and her torture by the Xindi).

Season 3 also gave me Degra—that alone makes 3 excellent. Here we have the developer of the weapon that totaled Earth yet he is not unrepentantly evil. Rather, Degra is someone who tries to make the right decisions with the facts he has. Degra created the bomb because he wants to protect his world. He wants to ensure that his children have a safe future. When faced with Archer’s evidence, Degra doesn’t stall. He behaves rationally. He recognizes the consequences of his decisions and tries to make for them. When confronted by Trip, he doesn’t react defensively. How he acts conveys who he is. That he dies violently at the hands of someone so despicable re-emphasizes his braveness and sincerity. If only the showrunners could have spent the same time and effort in developing the main cast of ENT…

I thought having an over-arching plot restricted the amount of fluff and improved pacing. I thought season 4 had many problems with pacing. The showrunner tried to cram so many ideas in season 4 that the stories seemed rushed. Certainly, they could have been more developed. I thought having an extra episode in the Demons/Terra Prime arc would have been useful (because Paxton’s organization was defeated in part by Trip being Macgyver…which required some suspension of belief). I thought incorporating hints of xenophobia (blowfish Phlox was a start) throughout the season would made Terra Prime a more insidious force and turned the arc into a battle of wills.

I didn’t really care about the Tellarites or Orions. Later I found out that they were calls to ST canon. However, I thought the gratuitous catering to sex appeal in Bound to be cringe-worthy. That the Orion women turned out to be the ones controlling the slaver would been interesting had there been more buildup to that reveal. The other problem I had with season 4 is execution. I thought the Augments arc examined relevant issues. It looked at nature versus nurture and the viability of genetic engineering on a society. However, the actors whom played the Augments were kind of wooden. Also, Soong oscillated between worried parent and malicious provocateur.

TATV was awful for various reasons. First, I didn’t understand why characters from TNG were on a finale for ENT. Even if this was supposed to be a finale for all of ST, shouldn’t the episode represent the entire body of ST canon? Second, I didn’t understand the point behind Trip’s death. Certainly, I could see him sacrificing himself for the crew---but did he really have to die so close to the de-commissioning at the hands of really amateur bandits? Third, it’s not realistic that the other bridge crew members never received a promotion in ten years. They’re all super competent. They saved Earth. Hoshi was instrumental during the Xindi Mission. Malcolm is a competent super spy. Lastly, why spend all that time building up T’Pol and Trip’s relationship if you’re just going to have them breakup off scene?

Trip and T’Pol:

I liked Trip and T’Pol’s relationship. Here we have two individuals from polar worlds who developed a friendship. They were sassy and super competent as a team. During the lowest point of their lives, they managed to find one another.

I thought their entire relationship regressed in season 4. So many of their problems in season 4 could have been resolved had they actually communicated with one another instead of running away, whether emotionally or physically. I thought the showrunner could have done a better job with T’Pol’s behavior in Daedulus. Considering the bond, I’d assume her coldness was due to fear as a result of her upbringing. The thing is, anything like that didn’t come across the scene very well (and there needs to something like that to make their overarching narrative in season 4 coherent). I also thought it was silly how every time Trip and T’Pol might have gotten their relationship figured out some obstacle popped up (i.e. Koss, T’Les dying, Terra Prime). I wouldn’t have cared about their breakup in TATV had it not been Demons/Terra Prime and the fact that the show spent a significant time in framing this fated narrative for them.

Theme Song:

It wasn’t that awful. Honestly. I thought the lyrics worked thematically.
 
I really like your analysis, even if I don't entirely agree with it. The one missing element for me is Shran. Jeffrey Combs brought the blue guy to life so well that he became a favorite of many fans. What's your impression?
 
I thought that Shran had personality in a show where that wasn't necessarily guaranteed. I thought that Shran was depicted as someone who was extremely competent and presented a nice contrast to Archer. I enjoyed how Archer and Shran played off one another. Archer's very much a traditional maverick, and it was nice having someone go head-to-head with him (i.e. the episode where Shran popped in during the Expanse). In a very distant way, Archer and Shran's relationship reminded me of Malcom and Trip's friendship. I thought Shran's transformation from enemy to reluctant ally to friend was well-done. It was a nice microcosm of the trajectory towards the foundation of the Federation.
 
Nice analysis. Love the fact that you are new to the show but willing to take the time to break it down.

But that theme song needs to go!

Red
 
Faith of the Heart - Best theme ever!

And no, I'm not joking. When my wife and I recently went through the full four years or ENT, we let the theme play through every time and she sang along in her stunningly original harmonies. I played it as the final moment of celebration at our 25th anniversary party because it nailed that journey "It's been a long road, getting from there to here." and our hope for the future (37 years now). I know it is an unusual opinion but there it is.
 
Jeffrey Combs is a very talented actor. As far as I know he played Characters, on DS9, Voyager and lastly on ENT, each time he made them great. It's not the Characters, it's him. I don't believe he played anything on TNG unless he wore so much make up that he'd be unrecognizable.
 
Welcome to the forum, voxstella!

It's very interesting to read the thoughts of a relative Trek outsider, as opposed to someone who has been tangled up in the issues for years. I think overall I agree with your judgements, but I'll just mention a few thoughts:

CHARACTERS:

Although I guess it's not wrong to talk about "three main characters", for me one of the good things about ENT is that unlike TOS it's not Kirk, then Spock, then Bones (sometimes), and then the others in the distance, it's an ensemble of interesting characters. I guess for me it's more of a "main five", as I consider Malcolm and Phlox to be main characters too.

Archer's personality problems... For me there are two Archers: Archer-I-like and Archer-the-writers-screwed-up. The times when he acts like an asshat (insulting the Vulcans in the pilot; taking his dog to the Plant of the Easily Offended) aren't his fault!

I like T'Pol, but I have a bit of an issue with the way Trek writers have made Vulcans so angsty and screwed up (in ENT and DS9).

I like Shran, but didn't like the way he became kind-of servile and needy towards the end. The character was much better when he was defiant and wilful, someone Archer couldn't control.


EPISODES:

With some of the episodes you criticise, I think the problem was really the execution rather than the basic premise. The Ferenghi episode was very character-based, but the directing didn't have the zing needed to keep it interesting. The shore-leave episode in theory should have been great, but the script was boring.

OTOH, I am not a fan of the episode Cogenitor. I just find it painful to watch Trip set up by the writers like that.

I agree about Breaking The Ice - low key but so well done.

I agree about the problems of season 4.


THEME SONG:

I'm not a fan. It's just too "stadium rock". I agree that the lyrics are appropriate, and the visuals are great. You might be interested to see something very similar that was used in the Japanese anime show Planetes:

[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ-OyT4ivkM[/yt]
 
CHARACTERS:

I agree with you that ENT is more of an ensemble cast than TOS. I liked how they had episode-specific characters outside the main 3 (Travis, Hoshi). You don't see TOS dedicating an episode about Chekov or Uhura. i feel like the other characters didn't really stand out to me. They totally blew the execution of episodes that focused on bridge members outside the three senior officers (again see Travis, Hoshi).

I think Malcolm and Phlox were very interesting characters. Phlox's conversation with his people's sworn enemy really stood out to me. Whereas his wife's escapades were played for comedic relief, the sickbay scene revealed that Phlox is more than his cheerful veneer. I wished they had set an episode on Denobula.

With Malcolm, making him an ex-intelligent agent was such a neat idea! Unfortunately, they introduced that idea half-way through season 4. I thought the back-alley interaction with his superior (Harris?) in Demons made Malcolm seem more interesting. It showed that he was willing to get dirty. For the longest time, Malcolm's played as maladjusted rule-follower. Knowing that Malcolm had this secret past from the very beginning would make his character more sympathetic. In addition, it would have made a nice juxtaposition with T'Pol during season 1 (when she was consistently thought of as a spy for the High Command).

I think T'Pol could be interpreted as angsty and screwed up. Certainly, taking Trellium is not the life decision, especially during a do or die mission. I think she comes off more of a screw up because she's presented initially as this very accomplished woman. Her interaction with Tolaris is interesting because he sets her up very deliberately. I'm surprised she let her curiosity overcome her intelligence background.

I don't think it's out of bounds to portray Vulcans as being screwed up. Vulcans' natures create conflict. Like using logic to compensate for your emotions is a form of self-denial. Pushing your emotions away isn't going to stop you from having them, especially considering mate or die. Furthermore, Vulcans indulge in ceremonies and tradition. What logic is there in doing the same thing millennium after millennium? I think ceremonies and traditions can be interpreted as extremely sentimental. Wouldn't it be more effective to automate everything? :) Anyways, the point I'm trying to make is that Vulcan nature is inherently a contradiction. Dealing with that contradiction is bound to create screwups.

EPISODES:

I liked Cogenitor more than I thought I would. It was obvious that they were engaging in emotional manipulation and Trip was set up as the patsy; but the fact that they ended the episode the way they did really make the entire episode unique.

THEME SONG:

I'm taking a wild guess, but I think one of the reasons the theme song is violently disliked is that it's not very sci-fi. It's something I would imagine on a network channel. I think people have a very specific idea towards what sci-fi should look and sound. Soft rock ballads aren't it.
 
I thought the theme song was a bit too mawkish and self-righteous not to mention cliché for my taste. I wouldn't have liked this song under any set of circumstances.
 
That the song is extremely mawkish is an entirely reasonable position to take. I'm just slightly baffled by people attributing the theme song as one of the reasons why the viewership for Enterprise was so low. Maybe I'm underestimating people's tolerance for ballards? I did fast forward the theme song for the first few seasons. It wasn't until the fourth season that the song finally grew on me.
 
Last edited:
Welcome, voxstella, and thank you for starting this great thread! I love reading discussions and analyses like these.

I'm so sad that I missed the commentary from the initial viewing. I would to get more thoughts about ENT at certain points in its narrative and character development.
 
That the song is extremely mawkish is an entirely reasonable position to take. I'm just slightly baffled by people attributing the theme song as one of the reasons why the viewership for Enterprise was so low. Maybe I'm underestimating people's tolerance for ballards? I did fast forward the theme song for the first few seasons. It wasn't until the fourth season that the song finally grew on me.

Maybe not, but it still could be a contributing factor. When there is one thing about a show that you don't like after a while it tends to reflect badly on the whole show.
 
I think most people find it easier to complain about specific things like theme song and characters than more difficult-to-define things like tone and consistency.
 
I think most people find it easier to complain about specific things like theme song and characters than more difficult-to-define things like tone and consistency.
Archer, withholding the cure for a deadly disease to millions of people because he didn't want to upset his doctor, seems idiotic enough to me.
 
Individual Episodes (Or the Episodes I Actually Remember After a Month)

Unexpected -

The first few episodes of a new show is supposed to grab an audience’s attention. It’s supposed to make the audience fall in love with the characters and world-building. I don’t think Unexpected accomplished either objective.

There wasn’t much besides Trip gets accidentally knocked up because of the shiny. The crew didn’t visit the Xyrillian homeworld. They didn’t explore shield or holographic technology, even though allusions could be made for both (Romulan shields and Starfleet holodecks). I didn’t discover anything new about the characters, even though they could have used Trip’s situation to explore character dynamics (BFF Archer and Trip, frenemies Trip and T’Pol, male bonding moment between reluctant co-workers Malcolm and Trip, gender reversal discussion with Hoshi and Trip, substitute paternal comfort with Phlox and Trip).

I would have been interested to see how Trip reacted to his pregnancy beyond the obvious physical effects. How does he react to his loss in agency and perceived emasculation? What’s the back-up plan if the crew never find the Xyrillians? How does the crew or the engineering team react to their superior’s situation?

Terra Nova -

They could have conveyed the same theme without being heavy-handed. Of course, a Novan was going to get injured and that’s how Enterprise will convince the locals to relocate. It’s not like we can actually rely on Archer’s skills of persuasion to effectuate a positive outcome. The last scene, starting with Travis’s rendition of every single person who vanished (why not throw in the Bermuda Triangle?), was pointless. I understand it was a self-congratulatory moment, but it added no impact. They should have ended with the Novans consenting or the two groups surviving a traumatic event and then shoot to the re-location and a silent gesture of thanks.

Throughout the episode, there’s a theme of ‘us versus them.’ Archer wants to save the Novans because they’re humans like him. Bernadette’s son distrusts Archer because he’s a human. He’s Dracula—he’s seduced Bernadette with pictures of the past. He’s the ‘other’ with powers that will destroy the Novan identity. While the rescue did much to resolve Novan fears regarding humanity, I wasn’t entirely convinced by the about face. Was one rescue going to overcome two to three generations of fear?

I didn’t like the paternalistic tone in most of the episode. Novans used simplistic language and basically amounted to tree people. They were blue and leafy. Their elders were children who survived the poison rain. When Archer was talking about rescuing the Novans and taking them back to Earth, T’Pol mentioned slavery and alienation of local culture. I was reminded of forceful relocations of Aborigines and Native Americans.

I thought it was interesting that T’Pol wondered why the humans didn’t ask for the Vulcans’ help once Terra Nova disappeared, and Trip said that the Vulcans always demanded too high a price for their aid. When Archer played Terra Nova’s last transmission, Mitchell implored Earth to send the Vulcans to rescue the children. I wished they played with this more—Archer’s resentment towards the Vulcans against his empathic nature (he was so very desperate to rescue the Novans) and feeling of responsibility as captain.

Likewise, I wished they had gone more in-depth about the tension between the initial settlers and the second wave. The transmission suggested that tensions were high between the two factions but it wasn’t outright war—despite Archer mentioning how the Novans would shoot on sight the first Terran spaceship that appeared above their world. Were the two sides posturing? What is the truth? I thought it was note-worthy that Terra Nova’s past was such a mess. It was almost interesting as why the colony vanished in the first place.

Breaking the Ice -

This was my favorite episode from season 1. It was understated but well-balanced in terms of plot, pacing, and character development. I enjoyed how the episode offered an angle rarely examined in Star Trek: what do the people back home, especially small children who draw Vulcans as your friendly local Martian, think about space exploration? Making the crew contemplate bizarre questions emphasized the newness of Enterprise’s mission and the fascination Earth has with its first space crew. If only they could have done an episode regarding media fascination with the Enterprise crew following the Xindi Mission.

I enjoyed Malcolm and Travis’s snowman on the asteroid. It adds levity and re-emphasizes the idea that the Enterprise crew are children. They’re new at space exploration. Everything they see is from the perspective of a child. Their wonderment is contrasted sharply with the Vulcans. I thought Archer’s dinner with Vanik was funny in the ‘can’t help but watch a train wreck from happening’ way. While Archer’s outburst is characteristic of his personality, it is disappointing that he let his temper get the better of him. Archer needs to be better considering his age and position as de facto goodwill ambassador. Props to him that he swallowed his pride and asked Vanik for help—but I wished he could have reached that realization without T’Pol prompting him.

I thought the mess regarding T’Pol’s engagement worked on many levels. First, it emphasized residual distrust regarding T’Pol. Archer may have warmed up to their Vulcan representative, but he and Trip can’t forget that she’s Vulcan and they resent all Vulcans. Never mind that T’Pol’s in a difficult position. As first officer, she has an obligation to uphold the crew’s welfare. As a diplomatic attache and former security officer, she feels a loyalty to Vulcan the same way Archer feels towards Starfleet.

Second, the letter incident broke the ice between T’Pol and Trip. I thought Trip’s guilt towards spying on T’Pol emphasizes his sense of loyalty. Trip might antagonize and distrust T’Pol but he respects her capabilities as first officer and it would be egregious to not confess. T’Pol was rightfully appalled by her invasion of privacy. Her seeking Trip’s advice is an acknowledgment that he wasn’t malicious in reading Koss’s parents’ letter.

Third, the discussion regarding T’Pol’s marriage is an examination of polar cultures. Their interactions can be contrasted with Vanik and Archer’s misconceptions at dinner. Unlike Vanik and Archer, Trip and T’Pol see each other as individuals (albeit maddeningly, frustrating examples but, hey, progress is progress when it’s human-Vulcan interactions). T’Pol and Trip’s entire conversation was, after all, about individual agency versus the expectations of an entire species.

That T’Pol decided to stay on Enterprise suggests it wasn’t a pointless conversation. It implies that the chasm between Vulcan and human mores isn’t as over-whelming as people might believe. It implies that each side has something worth-while to contribute. The sharing of pie at the end of the episode, along with Trip’s earlier comment about how pecan pie is good for the soul, suggests that progress is about individual members of a species willing to bend and share parts of themselves. It foreshadows a future where it won’t always be Vanik’s rigid pre-conceptions regarding human emotionality or Archer’s frustration over Vulcan logic and prudence.
 
The pie scene at the end of BTI was absolutely brilliant in how much it said with absolutely zero exposition. I remember actually exclaiming out loud on first viewing.
 
I think I've only watched Terra Nova once. It's the kind of "classic" TOS/TNG episode which I find tiresome.

I quite like Unexpected. It sets up early in the show that meeting new species is an unfamiliar and fiddly thing for them to do. Trip having to become acclimated to the alien ship was a neat idea. Maybe it was a bit of an obvious nod to previous series, but I liked Trip's "Wow" reaction to the alien holosuite.

The biology of alien pregnancy was interesting and gave Phlox something to do. I'm glad that Trip's pregnancy didn't lead to all the awful old sexist jokes about how he's turning into a woman and isn't a real man anymore - they are at least more advanced than that (more advanced than Picard calling Riker "Mr. Troi"). I'm of two minds about T'Pol scolding Trip for getting pregnant - it's a bit obvious, but OTOH it's funny!

Also interesting the subtle portrayal of the nature of these aliens. The way they leach off the Enterprise and then the Klingon ship, disrupting their systems, as well as impregnating Trip, shows that they are a rather selfish, inconsiderate people. It's not made a big deal of, but it's the obvious conclusion to draw.
 
I thought the scene was very subtle. It was quiet and an excellent example of showing instead of telling. I thought the scene demonstrated that the writing team could do a better job at presenting an episode---they just failed to for most of ENT. The writing team's preference for in-your-face presentation was somewhat frustrating.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top