• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Zora

No, it didn't. Your were comparing a historical movie with a science fiction prequel movie. Which is too stupid to go into all the details about how that doesn't work, because, like,... come on...

I am very aware that historical movies are often as make believe as science fiction prequel movies are. In Hollywood, they don't care about the difference between the two you claim is all important, and never have.
 
I am very aware that historical movies are often as make believe as science fiction prequel movies are. In Hollywood, they don't care about the difference between the two you claim is all important, and never have.

If you want that type of Robin Hood movies:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

...prepare for that type of unmidgated audience and box office disasters:
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=robinhood2018.htm

Personally, I really would hate if all future Star Trek incarnations would be boxed in to never do something else but shitty, unfaithful prequels to the 33rd century continuity. But hey... you do love what you do.
 
If you want that type of Robin Hood movies:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

...prepare for that type of unmidgated audience and box office disasters:
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=robinhood2018.htm

Personally, I really would hate if all future Star Trek incarnations would be boxed in to never do something else but shitty, unfaithful prequels to the 33rd century continuity. But hey... you do love what you do.

Wow. People have such short memories. There have literally been dozens of Robin Hood series and movies and historical accuracy hasn't been what made the best the best. Star Trek has already had eps which have been to the future. That means, in continuity, everything is already a prequel to those futures which may or may not even still exist in continuity.

I think its weird that some people feel the inclination to pre-hate future Star Trek incarnations that don't even exist yet based on a pre-hate of a 33rd century that none of us know is going to look like. I think its more in the positive vein that Star Trek is supposed to create in us to give them a chance to prove themselves.
 
Last edited:
The sets of both VOY and ENT got major do-overs in the middle of the run. Adjusted lightning, new console arrangements, screens, on ENT all the doors got new paint... The usual set redresses.
If such changes happened, they must have been damn subtle.
 
The Voyager bridge was damaged by a fire, but I think all they did was change the colour of the carpet.

Or I could be wrong and nothing changed because of the fire, I'm not seeing anything on google, yet.
 
The most notable change was in lightning. If you look at episodes from season 1&2, it has almost the same full, flat studio lightning that TNG had. They later changed that too a more "natural" lighting, where they enhanced the (already existing) lights built in the set itself to light the actors and scenes, makes a rib if difference in the "look" of the set. Apart from that only minor changes.
 
Lighting is just lighting. I don't think the ship is personalized enough that it would change from season-to-season unless I've missed something. And given the way the episodes keep picking up where the previous one left off, there's no real time to change up the ship.

In other words: I don't think the look of Discovery, inside or not, would change between S3 and "Calypso". I'm also convinced that "Calypso" somehow takes place during Season 3.

So "We'll know how the ship looks and they can't change it!" looks like a concern over nothing. It's presuming a change that we have no evidence of actually happening.
 
So this isn’t about the new Corvette? :shifty:
Zora was all retro. A mid-engined vette? No way. She'd be all about a 63 split-window with white wall tires and a taco replicator in the glove box for her main man Craft.
 
For design changes and even the 1,000-year abandonment, they could choose to resolve it in 1 episode or all season. The ship was pretty trashed from the final battle, so they could choose to modify it as they repair it. In the TNG episode "Timescape," time bubbles meant that Picard experienced weeks when the others only experienced moments when he touched that lil bowl of fruit, so it's really up to the writers how much time they want to give to either issue. Within 1 episode, the crew could ditch the ship and come back to it after a day, and have a pleasantly evolved A.I. to add to the family. Such is time in Trek.
 
Craft has gotten a lot of the attention from that episode, but he'll probably only be a side character at best, but we can probably safely assume Zora will be around to stay.
 
My theory?

Since they also have to bring Georgiou back to Discovery's original timeframe in time for her Section 31 show, somehow Georgiou is thrown back into the past on the ship, leaving the crew stranded without a ship in the future. She contacts Tyler (or maybe the Enterprise) to find a solution without alerting Starfleet in general or any remnants of Control in particular that the ship is back, and to find a way to get back to the future to help the crew. But there is none, at least not as directly as with the suit.

So they finally come up with the plan to park the ship in a nebula close to the last position Georgiou knew the crew to be, outfit it with an AI that will maintain the ship and its position, and if necessary actively avoid detection, as a type of time capsule for the crew to find. Or maybe Zora has orders to start flying towards the crew's position once the "time has come". But in these almost 1000 years Zora becomes sentient and independent enough to be able to fudge orders to pull Craft on board because she's lonely.

So, Georgiou is back in the past, Zora exists in the 32nd century, and if she reunites with the crew and they meet Craft later he can express how happy he is for her to have found her crew after all this time.

Correct me if I am wrong, but, without modification this scenario would imply that Georgiou was captain. I am pretty sure Zora said that the captain ordered her to stay there.

Obiously modifications of this scenario could accomplish the same. Zora is acquired as an upgrade in the future. She is then ordered to go back to the past, drop off Georgiou and any others that want to and then park in a nebula for 10 or so centuries. But basically, yes that is one way to make it fit within the story and relatively likely given what we know or think we know about S31 and Discovery.
 
My secret hope is that Discovery jumps back in time to the late 23rd century, but after the TOS movies - as that is a pretty unexplored era of Trek history.

The S31 show could take place then and neither show will step on established canon much and make people crazy.
 
Obiously modifications of this scenario could accomplish the same. Zora is acquired as an upgrade in the future. She is then ordered to go back to the past, drop off Georgiou and any others that want to and then park in a nebula for 10 or so centuries. But basically, yes that is one way to make it fit within the story and relatively likely given what we know or think we know about S31 and Discovery.
That's a pretty good theory.
 
Basically, then, we cater for two obvious plots:

1) "We only have enough time crystal power left for one jump. Shall we save X from a horrid end or send Captain Georgiou here back home for some R&R?" "Sir, there can only be one answer to that question."

2) "So the ship went to the past and then, from our point of view, should immediately appear where the autopilot will park, uh, has parked her for the millennium? That is, right here?" "Yes, Sir." "So where the hell is she?"

Timo Saloniemi
 
Basically, then, we cater for two obvious plots:

1) "We only have enough time crystal power left for one jump. Shall we save X from a horrid end or send Captain Georgiou here back home for some R&R?" "Sir, there can only be one answer to that question."

2) "So the ship went to the past and then, from our point of view, should immediately appear where the autopilot will park, uh, has parked her for the millennium? That is, right here?" "Yes, Sir." "So where the hell is she?"

Timo Saloniemi
Not sure why "R&R" would be a reason to send someone back. Trek has come up with countless reasons to send someone back, especially if they discover the future needs fixing. And if temporal tech isn't readily available at every kiosk & street vendor in the future, they could probably head to future Boreth and just grab another crystal.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top